Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Could someone please revert the color changes I made on March 18, 2022, at ] per ]? All colors should be reverted to their pre-March 18 values per the SNOW support at that discussion. Please be careful to not remove any other additions to this module since then. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Could someone please revert the color changes I made on March 18, 2022, at ] per ]? All colors should be reverted to their pre-March 18 values per the SNOW support at that discussion. Please be careful to not remove any other additions to this module since then. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ETp --> I think I found the right changes to make, but it is always a <em>lot</em> easier if you make the proposed changes in a sandbox and show it working on a testcases page. Please ping me if I made any unwanted changes. – ] (]) 18:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ETp --> I think I found the right changes to make, but it is always a <em>lot</em> easier if you make the proposed changes in a sandbox and show it working on a testcases page. Please ping me if I made any unwanted changes. – ] (]) 18:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
::Hi, @]! You accidentally reverted a few additions made earlier this year. ] on the sandbox page has the corrected module code. Previews are on ]. Please make the edit when you find the time. Thanks! {{smiley}} <span style="background:#ffff55">''''']'''''</span> <small style="font-size:calc(1em - 2pt)">(])</small> 03:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
This module is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Misplaced Pages. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Given the concerns regarding the changed colors and their relation to the ongoing ArbCom case against WPTC regarding stealth canvassing (which the process was heavily tainted by) – brought up here, here and here (the last one brought up by me specifically to get more input from members) – I propose that until the ArbCom case is finalized on May 4 (under a month from now) the legacy colors be temporarily restored until a decision on what to do regarding the RfC’s outcomes is made. The reasoning behind this is mostly to fix the discrepancy between the infoboxes/timelines and the track maps themselves, given that the project was in the middle of re-discussing a new scheme after the previous consensus and had not updated the maps. Even now, currently active systems are still using the old color scale for the track maps so I think it is better that at least for the next month we follow that so as to not give confusion to new readers. This is a genuine concern and not a case of WP:IDLI as I am considering the ramifications the currently convoluted situation has right now on our new readers. MarioProtIV (/contribs) 15:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Not done. We are not doing this. The proper process for an RfC is consensus first, then implementation of said consensus. In the meantime, the status quo should be upheld. It is far, far more disruptive to revert back and forth than it is to keep the current changes in place. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022
Done I think I found the right changes to make, but it is always a lot easier if you make the proposed changes in a sandbox and show it working on a testcases page. Please ping me if I made any unwanted changes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)