Misplaced Pages

User talk:Selket/Archive/6: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Selket Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:45, 17 December 2004 editGeni (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators37,898 edits →PETA← Previous edit Revision as of 11:33, 25 January 2005 edit undoAndrew Gray (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,906 edits Timeline of inventionsNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


:So we link page to a page that has a link (almost certainly not delibrately) to a porn site with extreamy clear warning. I don't feel that this can be described as linking to a porn site. I also do not feel it is a reason to remove the link (wikipedia links to far far worse).] 22:45, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC) :So we link page to a page that has a link (almost certainly not delibrately) to a porn site with extreamy clear warning. I don't feel that this can be described as linking to a porn site. I also do not feel it is a reason to remove the link (wikipedia links to far far worse).] 22:45, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

== Timeline of inventions ==

Hi,

On ], the two deleted were factually inaccurate -
* ] was explicitly at odds with the article on the subject, which cited an earlier case. However, that article ''doesn't'' give a source for the invention - the patent mentions "''...in a more easy and effectual manner than any hitherto discovered...''", wording which clearly indicates that artificial teeth were in use, and the patent was for a better ''form''.
* ] I left out simply because of the ambiguity of when it was invented - you could probably argue for half-a-dozen dates over forty years - but I was fairly confident that one wasn't it. (In all honesty, I also meant to go back and research it, but the rest of that week grew rather busy and I forgot).
In both cases, I felt it better to have no mention than verifiably incorrect information; Scramjet as is now looks fine, but Artificial teeth still looks wrong. ] 11:33, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:33, 25 January 2005

Greetings! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you have questions or doubts of any sort, do not hesitate to post them on the Village Pump, somebody will respond ASAP. Other helpful pages include:

Have fun! --Jiang 04:39 18 Jul 2003 (UTC)


PETA

Please do not delete external links with inacruate edit comments.Geni 21:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

So we link page to a page that has a link (almost certainly not delibrately) to a porn site with extreamy clear warning. I don't feel that this can be described as linking to a porn site. I also do not feel it is a reason to remove the link (wikipedia links to far far worse).Geni 22:45, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Timeline of inventions

Hi,

On Timeline of inventions, the two deleted were factually inaccurate -

  • Artificial teeth was explicitly at odds with the article on the subject, which cited an earlier case. However, that article doesn't give a source for the invention - the patent mentions "...in a more easy and effectual manner than any hitherto discovered...", wording which clearly indicates that artificial teeth were in use, and the patent was for a better form.
  • Scramjet I left out simply because of the ambiguity of when it was invented - you could probably argue for half-a-dozen dates over forty years - but I was fairly confident that one wasn't it. (In all honesty, I also meant to go back and research it, but the rest of that week grew rather busy and I forgot).

In both cases, I felt it better to have no mention than verifiably incorrect information; Scramjet as is now looks fine, but Artificial teeth still looks wrong. Shimgray 11:33, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)