Revision as of 08:17, 17 October 2022 edit41.13.164.128 (talk) →Jp Smith: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:17, 17 October 2022 edit undoTropicalkitty (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,387 editsm Undid edits by 41.13.164.128 (talk) to last revision by Rjensen: using talk page as forumTags: Undo SWViewer [1.4]Next edit → | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
Shouldn't there be info on the legality, laws or treaties regarding assassinations by governments? ] (]) 12:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC) | Shouldn't there be info on the legality, laws or treaties regarding assassinations by governments? ] (]) 12:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Jp Smith == | |||
abuses woman ] (]) 08:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:17, 17 October 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Assassination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Assassination is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 25, 2004. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Text and/or other creative content from Assassination was copied or moved into Targeted killing with . The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Category | The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
|
This article was selected as the article for improvement on 28 January 2019 for a period of one week. |
Definition
How can assassination be described as "people calling it an extra-judicial killing that lacks due process". Assassination is by any definition illegal, it isn't exactly an extreme interpretation to describe it as "extra-judiacial", in fact that is a euphemism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk • contribs) 07:01, 12 June 2012
"or military motives"
"or military motives": This should be removed, because it is not correct as it is against international law (perfidy):
“treacherous attempts upon the life of an enemy; as for example by keeping assassins in pay”
Treacherous attempt upon the life of an enemy The Lieber Code provides that “the common law of war allows even capital punishment for clandestine or treacherous attempts to injure an enemy, because they are so dangerous, and it is difficult to guard against them”. The Brussels Declaration prohibits “murder by treachery of individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army” and the Oxford Manual prohibits the making of “treacherous attempts upon the life of an enemy; as for example by keeping assassins in pay”. Under the Hague Regulations, it is prohibited “to kill or wound treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army”. The use of the term “individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army” clearly covers civilians as well as combatants.
The examples such as given in the section "As military and foreign policy doctrine" are either not military but political: assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, and Vietnam on both sides). In the case of Isoroku Yamamoto and Rommel killing enemy military commanders who is in arms, by members of the armed forces, and not paid assassins, is not assassination: Richard III was not assassinated at the Battle of Bosworth.
I suggest that "or military motives" is removed. -- PBS (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
I suggest that military motives is a right way of dealing with the situation,if military does not take any actions trators will continue ruining the mission of uplifting the country because of “fame" Ts he po phakama (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Laws
Shouldn't there be info on the legality, laws or treaties regarding assassinations by governments? Hammerfrog (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Death articles
- High-importance Death articles
- Misplaced Pages former articles for improvement