| Revision as of 20:26, 28 February 2007 editTaxwoman (talk | contribs)895 edits Oppose merger← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:44, 1 March 2007 edit undoLordFenix (talk | contribs)271 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == merge to ]? == | == merge to ]? == | ||
| I wish to merge this article with the list of uncommon fetishes, this a stub and not be notable; any objections.--]<sub>]</sub> 20:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | I wish to merge this article with the list of uncommon fetishes, this a stub and not be notable; any objections.--]<sub>]</sub> 20:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:44, 1 March 2007
merge to List of fetishes?
I wish to merge this article with the list of uncommon fetishes, this a stub and not be notable; any objections.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I am opposed to such a merge. Why would combining this into a larger list article make any more sense? Unless the various articles in such lists are deeply interdependent, they should be split into multiple articles. Also, what do you mean by not notable? Uniform fetishism is a common occurrence. --Eyrian 20:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's also a stub
with no sources. My mistake, it does have a source.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)- Just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be dropped into a big list. --Eyrian 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- oppose merge. Chris 05:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be dropped into a big list. --Eyrian 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's also a stub
This article stands quite well on its own. Is there any reason to merge other than to justify having a List of fetishes?--Taxwoman 20:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)