Revision as of 16:48, 15 October 2022 edit150.250.87.151 (talk)No edit summaryTag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:44, 27 October 2022 edit undoRanahuwais (talk | contribs)24 edits Added section and expanded the introduction, added sourcesTag: Visual editNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''Old media''', or '''legacy media''',<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.businessinsider.com/the-slow-death-of-legacy-media-2016-10 | title=The slow death of legacy media | publisher=Business Insider | date=10 October 2016 | first=Jeff | last=Desjardins | access-date=21 December 2018 }}</ref> are the ] institutions that dominated prior to the ]; particularly ], ]s, ]s, ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB111643067458336994 |url-status=live |title=How Old Media Can Survive in a New World |date=23 May 2005 |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080327071554/https://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB111643067458336994-dZdpfVsBBc8Y17yRcFtFhF_8YWk_20060522.html?mod=blogs |archive-date=27 March 2008 |access-date=2017-04-23 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan |last=Logan |first=Robert K. |chapter=The Changing Figure/Ground Relation with the 'New Media' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z8RhVp7B5uAC&pg=PA8 |publisher=Peter Lang |year=2010 |page=8 |oclc=764542063 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref name="Peterson">{{cite book |title=Anthropology & Mass Communication: Media and Myth in the New Millennium |last=Peterson |first=Mark Allen |orig-year=2003 |year=2008 |page=170 |chapter=The Ethnography of Media Production |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wr5EX7kuvY0C&pg=PA170 |publisher=Berghahn Books |isbn=978-1-57181-278-0 |oclc=823761828 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | '''Old media''', or '''legacy media''',<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.businessinsider.com/the-slow-death-of-legacy-media-2016-10 | title=The slow death of legacy media | publisher=Business Insider | date=10 October 2016 | first=Jeff | last=Desjardins | access-date=21 December 2018 }}</ref> are the ] institutions that dominated prior to the ]; particularly ], ]s, ]s, ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB111643067458336994 |url-status=live |title=How Old Media Can Survive in a New World |date=23 May 2005 |website=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080327071554/https://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB111643067458336994-dZdpfVsBBc8Y17yRcFtFhF_8YWk_20060522.html?mod=blogs |archive-date=27 March 2008 |access-date=2017-04-23 |df=dmy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan |last=Logan |first=Robert K. |chapter=The Changing Figure/Ground Relation with the 'New Media' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z8RhVp7B5uAC&pg=PA8 |publisher=Peter Lang |year=2010 |page=8 |oclc=764542063 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref name="Peterson">{{cite book |title=Anthropology & Mass Communication: Media and Myth in the New Millennium |last=Peterson |first=Mark Allen |orig-year=2003 |year=2008 |page=170 |chapter=The Ethnography of Media Production |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wr5EX7kuvY0C&pg=PA170 |publisher=Berghahn Books |isbn=978-1-57181-278-0 |oclc=823761828 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | ||
Old media institutions are centralized and communicate with one-way technologies to a generally anonymous mass audience.<ref name="Peterson"/><ref>{{cite book |title=Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village |last=Becker |first=Barbara |last2=Wehner |first2=Josef |editor-last=Ess |editor-first=Charles |editor2-last=Sudweeks |editor2-first=Fay |year=2001 |page=81 |chapter=Electronic Networks and Civil Society |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p7fpSZ_37UQC&pg=PA81 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-79145-016-1 |oclc=879232423 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref> ] computer technologies are ] and comparatively decentralized; they enable people to ] with one another |
Old media institutions are centralized and communicate with one-way technologies to a generally anonymous mass audience.<ref name="Peterson"/><ref>{{cite book |title=Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village |last=Becker |first=Barbara |last2=Wehner |first2=Josef |editor-last=Ess |editor-first=Charles |editor2-last=Sudweeks |editor2-first=Fay |year=2001 |page=81 |chapter=Electronic Networks and Civil Society |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p7fpSZ_37UQC&pg=PA81 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-79145-016-1 |oclc=879232423 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref> By definition, it is often dichotomized with ], more often computer technologies that are ] and comparatively decentralized; they enable people to ] with one another,<ref>{{cite book |last=Schorr |first=Angela |editor-last=Schorr |editor-first=Angela |editor2-last=Schenk |editor2-first=Michael |editor3-last=Campbell |editor3-first=William |year=2003 |title=Communication Research and Media Science in Europe: Perspectives for Research and Academic Training in Europe's Changing Media Reality |chapter=Interactivity: The New Media Use Option—State of the Art |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3h9mRJ-YSQAC&pg=PA57 |publisher=Mouton de Gruyter |page=57 |oclc=954099068 |access-date=2017-04-23 |via=Google Books}}</ref> due to their mass use and availability, namely through internet'''.'''<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=McQuail |first=Denis |title=McQuail's Mass Communication Theory |publisher=Sage |year=1983 |isbn=978-1-84920-291-6 |edition=6th |location=London |pages=136-138}}</ref> | ||
Old Media companies have diminished in the last decade with the changing media landscape, namely the modern reliance on streaming and digitization of what was once analog,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wolff |first=Michael |title=Television is the New Television: The Unexpected Triumph of Old Media in the Digital Age |publisher=Penguin |year=2017 |isbn=9780143108924 |pages=96-103}}</ref> and the advent of simple worldwide connection and mass conversation.<ref name=":0" /> Old media, or "legacy media" conglomerates include Disney, Warner Media, ViacomCBS, Bertelsmann Publishers, and NewsCorp., owners of Fox news and entertainment, and span from books to audio to visual media.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Hanson |first=Ralph E |title=Mass Communication: Living in a Media World |publisher=Sage |year=2022 |isbn=9781544382999 |edition=8th |location=Los Angeles |pages=56, 67, 73}}</ref> These conglomerates are often owned and inherited between families, such as the Murdochs of NewsCorp.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Folkenfilk |first=David |title=Murdoch's World: The Last of the old Media Empires |publisher=Public Affairs |year=2013 |isbn=9781610390897 |edition=1st |location=New York |pages=280-282}}</ref> Due to traditional media's heavy use in economics and political structures, it remains current regardless of New Media's emergence.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
== Old Media as Cultural Construct and Colloquialism == | |||
Old Media, opposed with its newer counterpart, has been found by theorists and historians like Chris Anderson (author of ''The Long Tail'' and the long tail phenomenon of mass communication),<ref name=":1" /> Marshall McLuhan, Wolfgang Ernst, and Carolyn Marvin<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Natale |first=Simone |date=2016 |title=There Are No Old Media |journal=Journal of Communication |volume=66 |issue=4 |pages=592-603 |via=JSTOR}}</ref> to be inaccurate to the realities of mass communication's progression. McLuhan, specifically, argues that a medium's information is contingent upon the medium itself.<ref name=":2" /> In so doing, it never dies and always remains current. Therefore, the binary of old and new media, with new media making old become obsolete, is inaccurate. It would be far more accurate, according to theoretical argument of authors like Ernst, to view new and old media as a spectrum.<ref name=":2" /> | |||
"Old media" as an idea only ever existed because "New Media" does. In the research of Simone Natale, the use of the term "Old Media" in a survey of books only began to become popular in the late twentieth century once the developments of New Media, such as the internet, became widely available.<ref name=":2" /> Natale writes of Old Media as a social construct because of this; because no media is old, one compares old to new in hindsight. | |||
== Advent of new media == | == Advent of new media == |
Revision as of 17:44, 27 October 2022
This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (June 2022) |
Old media, or legacy media, are the mass media institutions that dominated prior to the Information Age; particularly print media, film studios, music studios, advertising agencies, radio broadcasting, and television.
Old media institutions are centralized and communicate with one-way technologies to a generally anonymous mass audience. By definition, it is often dichotomized with New media, more often computer technologies that are interactive and comparatively decentralized; they enable people to telecommunicate with one another, due to their mass use and availability, namely through internet.
Old Media companies have diminished in the last decade with the changing media landscape, namely the modern reliance on streaming and digitization of what was once analog, and the advent of simple worldwide connection and mass conversation. Old media, or "legacy media" conglomerates include Disney, Warner Media, ViacomCBS, Bertelsmann Publishers, and NewsCorp., owners of Fox news and entertainment, and span from books to audio to visual media. These conglomerates are often owned and inherited between families, such as the Murdochs of NewsCorp. Due to traditional media's heavy use in economics and political structures, it remains current regardless of New Media's emergence.
Old Media as Cultural Construct and Colloquialism
Old Media, opposed with its newer counterpart, has been found by theorists and historians like Chris Anderson (author of The Long Tail and the long tail phenomenon of mass communication), Marshall McLuhan, Wolfgang Ernst, and Carolyn Marvin to be inaccurate to the realities of mass communication's progression. McLuhan, specifically, argues that a medium's information is contingent upon the medium itself. In so doing, it never dies and always remains current. Therefore, the binary of old and new media, with new media making old become obsolete, is inaccurate. It would be far more accurate, according to theoretical argument of authors like Ernst, to view new and old media as a spectrum.
"Old media" as an idea only ever existed because "New Media" does. In the research of Simone Natale, the use of the term "Old Media" in a survey of books only began to become popular in the late twentieth century once the developments of New Media, such as the internet, became widely available. Natale writes of Old Media as a social construct because of this; because no media is old, one compares old to new in hindsight.
Advent of new media
This section is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Misplaced Pages editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The advent of new communication technology (NCT) has brought forth a set of opportunities and challenges for conventional media. The presence of new media and the Internet in particular, has posed a challenge to conventional media, especially the printed newspaper. Analysts in industrial organizations and businesses are of the view that the U.S. newspaper industry is suffering through what could be its worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Advertising revenues are tumbling due to the severe economic downturn, while readership habits are changing as consumers turn to the Internet for free news and information. Some major newspaper chains are burdened by heavy debts. As in the past, major newspapers have declared bankruptcy as several big city papers shut down, lay off reporters and editors, impose pay reductions, cut the size of the physical newspaper, or turn to Web-only publication (Kirchhoff, 2009). The new media have also affected the way newspapers get and circulate their news. Since 1999, almost 90% of daily newspapers in the United States have been actively using online technologies to search for articles and most of them also create their own news websites to reach new markets. The main phenomenons of cost-cutting are bureau closure, staff reduction, increase in freelancing, stringers, and citizen journalists, reduction of printing costs, increase in advertising space, cuts in logistics thereby changing scope of stories, cuts in resources, office closure, remote/mobile work environments, platform switch, merging and consolidation and closure. It mainly converts physical news to digital news.
Challenges faced
Some observers believe that the challenges faced by conventional media, especially newspapers, has to do with the perfect storm of the global economic crisis, dwindling readership and advertising dollars, and the inability of newspapers to monetize their online efforts. Newspapers, especially in the West and the US in particular, have lost the lion's share of classified advertisement to the Internet. The situation worsened when a depressed economy forced more readers to cancel their newspaper subscriptions, and business firms to cut their advertising budget as part of the overall cost-cutting measurements. As a result, closures of newspapers, bankruptcy, job cuts and salary cuts are widespread. This has made some representatives of the US newspaper industry seek some sort of bailout from the government by allowing U.S. newspapers to recoup taxes they paid on profits earlier this decade to help offset some of their current losses. This is what they put forward to the Joint Committee of Congress (The Star Online, September 2009). Accusations are being hurled at search engines giants by publishers such as Sir David Bell, who categorically accused Google and Yahoo of "stealing" the contents of newspapers. A similar allegation came from media mogul Rupert Murdoch in early April 2009. "Should we be allowing Google to steal all our copyrights?" asked the News Corp Chief. Likewise, Sam Zell, owner of the Tribune Company that publishes the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times and the Baltimore Sun claimed it was the newspapers in America who allowed Google to steal their contents for nothing, but asked without the contents what would Google do, and how profitable would Google be?
See also
- New media
- Residual media
- Media intelligence
- Decline of newspapers
- History of telecommunications
- Mainstream media
- Social media
References
- Desjardins, Jeff (10 October 2016). "The slow death of legacy media". Business Insider. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
- "How Old Media Can Survive in a New World". The Wall Street Journal. 23 May 2005. Archived from the original on 27 March 2008. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
- Logan, Robert K. (2010). "The Changing Figure/Ground Relation with the 'New Media'". Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan. Peter Lang. p. 8. OCLC 764542063. Retrieved 23 April 2017 – via Google Books.
- ^ Peterson, Mark Allen (2008) . "The Ethnography of Media Production". Anthropology & Mass Communication: Media and Myth in the New Millennium. Berghahn Books. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-57181-278-0. OCLC 823761828. Retrieved 23 April 2017 – via Google Books.
- Becker, Barbara; Wehner, Josef (2001). "Electronic Networks and Civil Society". In Ess, Charles; Sudweeks, Fay (eds.). Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village. SUNY Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-0-79145-016-1. OCLC 879232423. Retrieved 23 April 2017 – via Google Books.
- Schorr, Angela (2003). "Interactivity: The New Media Use Option—State of the Art". In Schorr, Angela; Schenk, Michael; Campbell, William (eds.). Communication Research and Media Science in Europe: Perspectives for Research and Academic Training in Europe's Changing Media Reality. Mouton de Gruyter. p. 57. OCLC 954099068. Retrieved 23 April 2017 – via Google Books.
- ^ McQuail, Denis (1983). McQuail's Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). London: Sage. pp. 136–138. ISBN 978-1-84920-291-6.
- Wolff, Michael (2017). Television is the New Television: The Unexpected Triumph of Old Media in the Digital Age. Penguin. pp. 96–103. ISBN 9780143108924.
- ^ Hanson, Ralph E (2022). Mass Communication: Living in a Media World (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. pp. 56, 67, 73. ISBN 9781544382999.
- Folkenfilk, David (2013). Murdoch's World: The Last of the old Media Empires (1st ed.). New York: Public Affairs. pp. 280–282. ISBN 9781610390897.
- ^ Natale, Simone (2016). "There Are No Old Media". Journal of Communication. 66 (4): 592–603 – via JSTOR.
- Garrison, B., 1996. Successful Strategies for Computer-Assisted Reporting. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Domingo, D. & A. Heinone. 2008. "Weblogs and Journalism: A Typology to Explore the Blurring Boundaries." Nordicom Review, 29 (1): 3-15. )
- Barthelemy, S., M. Bethell, T. Christiansen, A. Jarsvall & K. Koinis. 2011. "http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/academics/workshops/documents/WorldNewuigsmediaInnovationsStudy-CapstoneWorkshopSpring2011-ABRIDGED.pdf)
- Domingo, D. & A. Heinone. 2008. "Weblogs and Journalism: A Typology to Explore the Blurring Boundaries." Nordicom Review, 29 (1): 3-15. )
- Yap, B. 2009. "Time running out for newspapers." The Malaysian Insider. Retrieved 31 October 2010 from http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/brianyap/28538-time-running-out-for-newspapers.
- ^ Mahmud, S. 2009. "Is the newspaper industry at death's door?" Retrieved 30 October 2009 from: http://www.mysinchew.com/node/24415?tid=14.Straits Times. 22 October 2008.