| Revision as of 02:33, 16 March 2005 view sourceDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits this article needs a lot of work... but I added real inkblot instead of a fake one that didn't really look anything like the ones used in the test← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:51, 16 March 2005 view source DreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits some more tweaks (the wikipedia commons that was linked isn't real Roschach, so nonnotable for this article) 2 links had same content, so removed oneNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ]The '''Rorschach''' (pronounced approximately as "roar-shock" in English)<!-- I dispute this pronunciation, a German would say 'roarshach' ch as in loch --> |
]The '''Rorschach inkblot test''' (pronounced approximately as "roar-shock" in English)<!-- I dispute this pronunciation, a German would say 'roarshach' ch as in loch --> is a method of ] evaluation. It is a ] associated with the ] school of thought. Psychologists use this test to try to probe the ]s of their patients. | ||
| ==History== | ==History== | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ==Methods== | ==Methods== | ||
| There are ten official inkblots. The psychologist shows the inkblots in a particular order and asks the patient to say the first thing that comes to mind. After the patient has seen and responded to all the inkblots, the psychologist then gives them to him again one at a time to study. The patient is asked to list everything he sees in each blot. The blot can also be rotated. Although the psychologist will not tell the patient so, spontaneous turning of the blot or asking permission to do so is seen as a positive sign if the blot is turned 90, 180, or 270 degrees; however, turning the cards at odd angles or covering portions of the cards is considered a sign of ]. As the patient is examining the inkblots, the psychologist writes down everything the patient says or does, no matter how trivial. The psychologist takes into account whether all of the card or a portion of it is used. | There are ten official inkblots. The psychologist shows the inkblots in a particular order and asks the patient to say the first thing that comes to mind. After the patient has seen and responded to all the inkblots, the psychologist then gives them to him again one at a time to study. The patient is asked to list everything he sees in each blot. The blot can also be rotated. Although the psychologist will not tell the patient so, spontaneous turning of the blot or asking permission to do so is seen as a positive sign if the blot is turned 90, 180, or 270 degrees; however, turning the cards at odd angles or covering portions of the cards is considered a sign of ]. As the patient is examining the inkblots, the psychologist writes down everything the patient says or does, no matter how trivial. The psychologist takes into account whether all of the card or a portion of it is used. | ||
| ===Evaluation=== | |||
| Methods of interpretation differ. In one interpretation, each inkblot reveals the patient's feelings about a particular person or situation. For example, one inkblot is supposed to represent the patient's mother. Negative comments regarding the images in this inkblot indicate unresolved conflict with the mother. Another inkblot shows how the patient feels about his father. Most, if not all, inkblots contain symbols and images that are supposed to be interpreted sexually. More than four mentions of sexual imagery means that the patient has an obsession with sex. Seeing certain images may indicate ], although this is disputable. | Methods of interpretation differ. In one interpretation, each inkblot reveals the patient's feelings about a particular person or situation. For example, one inkblot is supposed to represent the patient's mother. Negative comments regarding the images in this inkblot indicate unresolved conflict with the mother. Another inkblot shows how the patient feels about his father. Most, if not all, inkblots contain symbols and images that are supposed to be interpreted sexually. More than four mentions of sexual imagery means that the patient has an obsession with sex. Seeing certain images may indicate ], although this is disputable. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| When interpreted as a projective test, results are poorly verifiable. The ], which interprets the test in terms of what factor (shading, color, outline, etc.) of the inkblot leads to each of the tested person's comments, is meant to address this, but problems of test validity remain. | When interpreted as a projective test, results are poorly verifiable. The ], which interprets the test in terms of what factor (shading, color, outline, etc.) of the inkblot leads to each of the tested person's comments, is meant to address this, but problems of test validity remain. | ||
| Supporters of the test try to keep the actual cards secret. The official test is sold only to licensed professionals. | Supporters of the test try to keep the actual cards secret so that the answers are spontaneous. The official test is sold only to licensed professionals. | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
| ⚫ | * entry in the ''Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology'' | ||
| {{commons|Rorschachtest}} | |||
| * | * article criticizing the test | ||
| * | * by Robyn M. Dawes, ''IPT Journal,'' Fall 1991 | ||
| ⚫ | * | ||
| ==External links== | |||
| ⚫ | * | ||
| * | |||
| * | * | ||
| * | * | ||
| ⚫ | * | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 02:51, 16 March 2005
The Rorschach inkblot test (pronounced approximately as "roar-shock" in English) is a method of psychological evaluation. It is a projective test associated with the Freudian school of thought. Psychologists use this test to try to probe the unconscious minds of their patients.
History
The Rorschach inkblot test was developed by Hermann Rorschach, a Swiss psychologist, in the early twentieth century. Rorschach was a proponent of Freudian psychoanalysis, which emphasizes the role of the subconscious.
Methods
There are ten official inkblots. The psychologist shows the inkblots in a particular order and asks the patient to say the first thing that comes to mind. After the patient has seen and responded to all the inkblots, the psychologist then gives them to him again one at a time to study. The patient is asked to list everything he sees in each blot. The blot can also be rotated. Although the psychologist will not tell the patient so, spontaneous turning of the blot or asking permission to do so is seen as a positive sign if the blot is turned 90, 180, or 270 degrees; however, turning the cards at odd angles or covering portions of the cards is considered a sign of brain damage. As the patient is examining the inkblots, the psychologist writes down everything the patient says or does, no matter how trivial. The psychologist takes into account whether all of the card or a portion of it is used.
Methods of interpretation differ. In one interpretation, each inkblot reveals the patient's feelings about a particular person or situation. For example, one inkblot is supposed to represent the patient's mother. Negative comments regarding the images in this inkblot indicate unresolved conflict with the mother. Another inkblot shows how the patient feels about his father. Most, if not all, inkblots contain symbols and images that are supposed to be interpreted sexually. More than four mentions of sexual imagery means that the patient has an obsession with sex. Seeing certain images may indicate schizophrenia, although this is disputable.
Controversy
The Rorschach inkblot test is controversial for several reasons. Firstly, there is no reason to believe that images found in the ink blots represent some core personality or self rather than feelings, past experience, creativity, or some other part of the mind that would not play a major part in the patient's actions.
Secondly, because the blots of ink are inherently meaningless and subjective, evaluating the results of a test requires the blots of ink to have meaning in the first place. Otherwise, the images projected into the patterns would be of little value in assessing personality traits. But the psychologist must project onto the patterns in order to give them any meaning and, in a sense, take the test him/herself. So the results of any test will not only show what the patient projected onto the ink blots, but also what the psychologist projected onto the projections of the patient. Third parties could be called in to evaluate what effect the psychologist's interpretations had on the results of the test, but the third parties' evaluations would also be slanted by their own subconscious interpretations of meaningless patterns. The process of evaluating and re-evaluating could go on forever.
Thirdly, although a large number of people with a certain trait see specific images in an ink blot—sociable people have a tendency to see animals in this image; people with schizophrenia have a tendency to see a vase in this image—any given person who sees an image that is seen in an ink blot by a large number of people with a specific trait will not necessarily have that trait her/himself. The Holtzman Inkblot Test was designed to resolve some of the problems of the Rorschach test.
When interpreted as a projective test, results are poorly verifiable. The Exner system of scoring, which interprets the test in terms of what factor (shading, color, outline, etc.) of the inkblot leads to each of the tested person's comments, is meant to address this, but problems of test validity remain.
Supporters of the test try to keep the actual cards secret so that the answers are spontaneous. The official test is sold only to licensed professionals.
References
- "Rorschach technique" entry in the Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology
- The Skeptic's Dictionary article criticizing the test
- "Giving up Cherished Ideas: The Rorschach Ink Blot Test" by Robyn M. Dawes, IPT Journal, Fall 1991
External links
- International Rorschach Society
- History of Inkblot Techniques
- Outlines of the official Rorschach inkblots, with criticism