Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Classical homeopathy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:51, 2 March 2007 editVanished user (talk | contribs)15,602 edits Nominate for deletion  Revision as of 17:54, 2 March 2007 edit undoVanished user (talk | contribs)15,602 edits →[]: Revise statement to be more neutral.Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}}
:{{la|Classical homeopathy}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Classical homeopathy}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Possible POV fork of ] - covers almost entirely the same content, but in a highly POV-ridden way. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Possible POV fork of ], though, to be fair, there is strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 2 March 2007

Classical homeopathy

Classical homeopathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Possible POV fork of Homeopathy, though, to be fair, there is strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. Adam Cuerden 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Categories: