Misplaced Pages

User talk:71.49.192.248: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:13, 8 December 2022 edit71.49.192.248 (talk) →Unblock Three: new sectionTags: New topic Possible vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 15:21, 8 December 2022 edit undo331dot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,480 edits decline unblockNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
== Unblock Three == == Unblock Three ==


{{unblock|reason=You know it would save a LOT of time in the future for Jacona and wolfchild just to be instructed to leave my valid edits alone ] (]) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)}} ] (]) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC) {{unblock reviewed|reason=You know it would save a LOT of time in the future for Jacona and wolfchild just to be instructed to leave my valid edits alone ] (]) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)|decline=See ]. ] (]) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)}}
You don't need to sign your request both inside and outside it. ] (]) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:21, 8 December 2022

Another sock of User:Kompress0

— Jacona (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

What are you saying? You don't like someone following you around reverting your edits? 71.49.192.248 (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
I have blocked you for 48 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Yeah but see you're not privy to the whole situation. Jacona and wolfchild have been harassing me for months, the only difference is they're established users so they get away with it. 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock Request Too

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd be glad to go back to being a contributing member here, if Jacona and wolfchild will get over their spite and leave my valid edits alone 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Three

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You know it would save a LOT of time in the future for Jacona and wolfchild just to be instructed to leave my valid edits alone 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See ]. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You don't need to sign your request both inside and outside it. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)