| Revision as of 16:52, 6 March 2007 editOdin's Beard (talk | contribs)10,341 edits ←Created page with '==Vandalism== Your edits to the Thing and Hulk articles can be considered vandalism. For the Thing article, removal of a piece ...' | Revision as of 07:36, 7 March 2007 edit undoAsgardian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,108 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Vandalism== | ==Vandalism== | ||
| Your edits to the ] and ] articles can be considered vandalism. For the Thing article, removal of a piece of information when there is a verifiable source to back up the information given is vandalism if you don't have a valid reason. The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe, for example, states that the Thing possesses some degree of superhuman speed. If you have a legitimate source that retcons that, then provide it. Removing it because you simply don't agree with it is irrelevant. As to the Hulk article, adding nonsense, as you did to the list of Hulk aliases, is also vandalism. Constructive edits are encouraged, but Misplaced Pages isn't a fanboy haven. The official facts are what goes into the articles, not personal opinions. ] 16:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | Your edits to the ] and ] articles can be considered vandalism. For the Thing article, removal of a piece of information when there is a verifiable source to back up the information given is vandalism if you don't have a valid reason. The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe, for example, states that the Thing possesses some degree of superhuman speed. If you have a legitimate source that retcons that, then provide it. Removing it because you simply don't agree with it is irrelevant. As to the Hulk article, adding nonsense, as you did to the list of Hulk aliases, is also vandalism. Constructive edits are encouraged, but Misplaced Pages isn't a fanboy haven. The official facts are what goes into the articles, not personal opinions. ] 16:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| : Seconded. I could understand if you were fighting for self-written material that was sourced, in present tense etc. Just lifting paragraphs from Marvel sites and adding "fanboy speculation", however, doesn't cut it. | |||
| ] 07:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:36, 7 March 2007
Vandalism
Your edits to the Thing and Hulk articles can be considered vandalism. For the Thing article, removal of a piece of information when there is a verifiable source to back up the information given is vandalism if you don't have a valid reason. The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe, for example, states that the Thing possesses some degree of superhuman speed. If you have a legitimate source that retcons that, then provide it. Removing it because you simply don't agree with it is irrelevant. As to the Hulk article, adding nonsense, as you did to the list of Hulk aliases, is also vandalism. Constructive edits are encouraged, but Misplaced Pages isn't a fanboy haven. The official facts are what goes into the articles, not personal opinions. Odin's Beard 16:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Seconded. I could understand if you were fighting for self-written material that was sourced, in present tense etc. Just lifting paragraphs from Marvel sites and adding "fanboy speculation", however, doesn't cut it.