| Revision as of 22:59, 18 January 2023 edit63.139.68.87 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:58, 18 January 2023 edit undoHackerKnownAs (talk | contribs)478 edits →15.ai: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| *'''Keep''', articles like ] and ], which have far fewer reliable sources, are allowed to stay but somehow THIS gets nominated for deletion? Seriously? ] (]) 22:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', articles like ] and ], which have far fewer reliable sources, are allowed to stay but somehow THIS gets nominated for deletion? Seriously? ] (]) 22:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
| *:The OP's claims are so replete with falsehoods and misinformation that it suggests to me that this AfD nomination was not made in good faith. The first two sentences are completely wrong—the project is not "unfinished" but rather constantly improving, the website is not "dead," the creator did not collect "My Little Pony videos," the voice cloning software is not "open source"—that I suspect that this was done fully on purpose. —] (]) 23:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 18 January 2023
15.ai
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- 15.ai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an anonymous creator's unfinished project at a dead website, where they collected all of the My Little Pony videos and ran them through open source voice cloning software. Their grandiose view of their own project doesn't mean that it's notable. This article is 49% original research, and 49% content that needs to be moved to the Audio_deepfake article, since it's so generalized. I'm very impressed at boundless energy this particular group of editors has towards curating this article, considering the topic. It ultimately doesn't belong on Misplaced Pages though. Habanero-tan (talk) 00:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 16. —Talk to my owner:Online 01:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Other than the IGN article and the Arxiv pre-prints, the rest aren't reliable as sources. I don't find any RS discussions we could use. Oaktree b (talk) 01:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Extremely important as it's one example of the first TTS voice generators and neural networks. I do not see why this is considered for deletion and it's currently under maintenance. There is also plenty of high quality citations. (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloodclotboy12 (talk • contribs)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Websites. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, how the hell did this become a GA? LilianaUwU 13:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, although context from this article could probably make more general adjacent articles (such as Deepfake) into a GA article. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. As one of the primary editors of the article in the past (now mostly inactive due to real-life things), the article from several months ago was most certainly up to GA standards. However, this article has constantly been plagued by anonymous editors and new users making unsubstantiated edits ever since the article was first created. I have since reverted the article back to what it was back in November. As for notability, the subjects absolutely meets the requisite standards, and as pointed above, was extremely crucial in the development of TTS voice generation. I apologize for being inactive as an editor for so long, but I did not expect the level of vandalism to reach this high, causing concern for the legitimacy of this article. —HackerKnownAs (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have since requested a higher level of protection for the article. The last request was accepted and lasted for a month, but it appears that this was not nearly strong enough. —HackerKnownAs (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The guy who runs the site goes on hiatus like every other month for improvements, this isn't anything new. Page was still up the last time it went under maintenance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AveTrueToCaesar (talk • contribs) 20:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, articles like NovelAI and character.ai, which have far fewer reliable sources, are allowed to stay but somehow THIS gets nominated for deletion? Seriously? 63.139.68.87 (talk) 22:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- The OP's claims are so replete with falsehoods and misinformation that it suggests to me that this AfD nomination was not made in good faith. The first two sentences are completely wrong—the project is not "unfinished" but rather constantly improving, the website is not "dead," the creator did not collect "My Little Pony videos," the voice cloning software is not "open source"—that I suspect that this was done fully on purpose. —HackerKnownAs (talk) 23:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)