Misplaced Pages

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:11, 26 January 2023 editSideswipe9th (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers11,284 edits Opinion on royal assent: rephrase sentence on Jack and Badenoch's refusal to attend the Scottish Parliament committee← Previous edit Revision as of 19:45, 26 January 2023 edit undoAtchom (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users45,088 edits Opinion on royal assentTag: Visual editNext edit →
Line 497: Line 497:
Both ] and Kemi Badenoch were invited by the Scottish Parliament's Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee to give evidence about their decision to block the bill, however both refused to attend.<ref>{{cite web |last1=R Hunter |title='Absolute disgrace': Alister Jack snubs Holyrood committee invite|date=19 January 2023 |url=https://www.thenational.scot/news/23263699.absolute-disgrace-alister-jack-snubs-holyrood-committee-invite/ |website=thenational.scot |publisher=The National |access-date=23 January 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=A Garton-Crobie |title=Kemi Badenoch declines invitation to Holyrood committee|date=23 January 2023 |url=https://www.thenational.scot/news/23269754.kemi-badenoch-declines-invitation-holyrood-committee/ |website=thenational.scot |publisher=The National |access-date=23 January 2023}}</ref> Both ] and Kemi Badenoch were invited by the Scottish Parliament's Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee to give evidence about their decision to block the bill, however both refused to attend.<ref>{{cite web |last1=R Hunter |title='Absolute disgrace': Alister Jack snubs Holyrood committee invite|date=19 January 2023 |url=https://www.thenational.scot/news/23263699.absolute-disgrace-alister-jack-snubs-holyrood-committee-invite/ |website=thenational.scot |publisher=The National |access-date=23 January 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=A Garton-Crobie |title=Kemi Badenoch declines invitation to Holyrood committee|date=23 January 2023 |url=https://www.thenational.scot/news/23269754.kemi-badenoch-declines-invitation-holyrood-committee/ |website=thenational.scot |publisher=The National |access-date=23 January 2023}}</ref>


], formerly deputy president of the UK Supreme Court and former Labour shadow attorney general ] both defended the legality of the government's decision.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Government's s 35 order reasons prompt further argument |url=https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/legal-news/governments-s-35-order-reasons-prompt-further-argument/ |access-date=2023-01-18 |website=Law Society of Scotland |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=https://twitter.com/smyth_chris/status/1614906550849609728 |url=https://twitter.com/smyth_chris/status/1614906550849609728 |access-date=2023-01-18 |website=Twitter |language=en}}</ref> However ] has tweeted that the UK government’s reasons are not justified.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gender row legal challenge likely to fail – judge|date=18 January 2023 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-64315517 |website=bbc.co.uk |publisher=BBC |access-date=18 January 2023}}</ref> ], formerly deputy president of the ] defended the legality of the UK government's decision and said that the possibility of success of a legal challenge against the decision by the Scottish Government was "very low".<ref>{{Cite web |title=Government's s 35 order reasons prompt further argument |url=https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/legal-news/governments-s-35-order-reasons-prompt-further-argument/ |access-date=2023-01-18 |website=Law Society of Scotland |language=en}}</ref> Former Labour shadow attorney general ], who is personally in favour of the reforms, also defended the legality of the government's decision.<ref>{{Cite web |title=https://twitter.com/smyth_chris/status/1614906550849609728 |url=https://twitter.com/smyth_chris/status/1614906550849609728 |access-date=2023-01-18 |website=Twitter |language=en}}</ref> Former Labour Lord Chancellor ] has tweeted that the UK government’s reasons are not justified.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gender row legal challenge likely to fail – judge|date=18 January 2023 |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-64315517 |website=bbc.co.uk |publisher=BBC |access-date=18 January 2023}}</ref>


Evoking memories of ], the legislation that had prohibited the "promotion of homosexuality" by local authorities, ], the chief executive of ], and Colin Macfarlane, the LGBTQ+ rights campaign's Scotland director, warned Sunak he was risking "re-toxifying" his government's record on LGBTQ+ rights and introducing "an effective trans travel ban". Kelley and Macfarlane were quoted as saying "the UK government sees trans people as a threat to be contained, not citizens to be respected." A Cabinet Office spokesperson responded by saying that trans people "have not and will not be banned" from entering the UK.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/10/tories-review-lgbtq-gender-recognition-certificate-deal|title=UK review of gender recognition list risks 'trans travel ban'|last=Brooks|first=Libby|date=10 January 2023|work=The Guardian|access-date=17 January 2023}}</ref> ] activists criticized the ] and ] for not opposing the governing ] in blocking the bill in the UK. Some who were ] were reported to have switched support for ], with one being quoted as saying: "Now, I understand that independence is the only way to achieve goals in the face of a highly conservative UK government."<ref name="Ramsay 2023"/> Evoking memories of ], the legislation that had prohibited the "promotion of homosexuality" by local authorities, ], the chief executive of ], and Colin Macfarlane, the LGBTQ+ rights campaign's Scotland director, claimed Sunak was risking "re-toxifying" his government's record on LGBTQ+ rights and introducing "an effective trans travel ban". Kelley and Macfarlane were quoted as saying "the UK government sees trans people as a threat to be contained, not citizens to be respected." A Cabinet Office spokesperson responded by saying that trans people "have not and will not be banned" from entering the UK.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/10/tories-review-lgbtq-gender-recognition-certificate-deal|title=UK review of gender recognition list risks 'trans travel ban'|last=Brooks|first=Libby|date=10 January 2023|work=The Guardian|access-date=17 January 2023}}</ref> ] activists criticized the ] and ] for not opposing the governing ] in blocking the bill in the UK. Some who were ] were reported to have switched support for ], with one being quoted as saying: "Now, I understand that independence is the only way to achieve goals in the face of a highly conservative UK government."<ref name="Ramsay 2023"/>


== See also == == See also ==

Revision as of 19:45, 26 January 2023

Proposed Scottish law

United Kingdom legislation
Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill
Scottish Parliament
Long titleAn Act of the Scottish Parliament to reform the grounds and procedure for obtaining gender recognition; and for connected purposes.
Introduced byShona Robison
Other legislation
AmendsGender Recognition Act 2004
History of passage through Parliament

The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill is a bill passed by the Scottish Parliament. The bill seeks to amend the Gender Recognition Act 2004 of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, making it simpler for people to change their legal gender. On 17 January 2023, the United Kingdom government used section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 to block the bill from receiving royal assent, the first time section 35 has been used.

Background

See also: Goodwin v United Kingdom and Gender Recognition Act 2004

In July 2002, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in the Goodwin v United Kingdom case that a trans person's inability to change the sex on their birth certificate was a breach of their rights under Article 8 (privacy) and Article 12 (marriage) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Following this judgement, the UK government had to introduce new legislation to comply, which became law as the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA). To obtain a gender recognition certificate (GRC) under the GRA, an applicant must a) provide evidence of a diagnosis of gender dysphoria; b) have lived in their "acquired gender" for two years; and c) make a statutory declaration that they intend to live in the acquired gender until death.

In a June 2020 report, the European Commission classified the legal procedures for gender recognition of 28 European countries into five categories based on the barriers to access. This placed the UK's Gender Recognition Act 2004 in the second from bottom category with "intrusive medical requirements" that lag behind international human rights standards. The procedures have also been described as costly, bureaucratic, and time-consuming for trans people, with successful applicants having to wait two years until they can change their legal gender.

The issue of gender recognition is devolved in Scotland, which allows the Scottish parliament, if it wishes, to legislate for a different policy to that of England and Wales. In 2004, the Scottish Parliament passed a motion to consent to Wesminster's GRA, so that a uniform system of gender recognition would be in place throughout the UK. A 2018 consultation in England and Wales found that a majority of the over 100,000 respondents were in favour of removing most of the requirements for a GRC; despite this, in 2020, the government in Westminster announced that it would not legislate to relax the requirements. Separately, the Scottish government also consulted on reforming the law: an initial consultation on the principles of the bill which took place between November 2017 and March 2018 found a majority of the 15,500 respondents in favour of the bill; and the second consultation on a draft bill, taking place between November 2019 and March 2020, also found majority support.

Legislative process

Draft stage

The Scottish National Party (SNP) committed to "review and reform gender recognition law, so it's in line with international best practice for people who are Transgender" in their manifesto for the 2016 Scottish Parliament election, which they won. After the consultations ended, the Scottish government intended to introduce the bill to Parliament in 2020, but was forced by the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland to delay consideration until after the 2021 Scottish Parliament election.

The 2021 election saw the SNP returned to government, this time in a coalition with the Scottish Greens rather than as a minority government; both parties featured the bill in their manifestos. The Bute House Agreement between the two parties committed to introducing a Gender Recognition Reform Bill before the end of May 2022.

Stage 1

The bill was introduced on 2 March 2022, by Shona Robison, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government. The bill lowers the age people can change their legal gender from 18 to 16, removes the requirement of a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and reduces the waiting time from two years to six months of living in an acquired gender. Also issued on the same day were a delegated powers memorandum, financial memorandum, policy memorandum, and statement of legislative competence.

The bill was subject to a mandatory consultation–its third–by the Scottish Parliament's Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. This committee was designated as the lead committee and ran thirteen evidence sessions. The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee of the Scottish Parliament, issued a report to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, on 16 May 2022, regarding the delegated powers memorandum for the bill, which reported they were content with the delegated powers provisions contained within the bill. The Finance and Public Administration Committee held a consultation on the financial memorandum, which received six responses, all of which were forwarded to the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. The committee took no action based on the results of its consultation and recommended no changes to the financial memorandum.

The Stage 1 report, from the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee, recommended that the general principles be approved.

Stage 1 vote

The bill was voted on by the full parliament on 27 October 2022 and passed by a majority of 88 to 33, with 4 abstentions and 4 members not voting.

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill – Stage 1
Party Votes for Votes against Abstained Did Not Vote
Conservative 2 26 2 1
Labour 21 1
Liberal Democrats 4
SNP 54 7 2 1
Scottish Green 7
No Party Affiliation (Presiding Officer) 1
Total 88 33 4 4

Stage 2

A number of amendments were proposed made to the bill at Stage 2, the majority of which were not passed. The Finance and Public Administration Committee published an updated financial memorandum on 7 December 2022 on the bill and noted the updates at its meeting on 13 December 2022.

Stage 3

The bill was heard at Stage 3 on 20–21 December 2022 for amendments to the bill. The final debate and vote was held on 22 December 2022.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

On 19 December 2022, the day before the Stage 3 debate began, the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee held an evidence session on the bill. They heard from two United Nations representatives, Victor Madrigal-Borloz, an expert on gender identity and United Nations Independent Expert on Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and Reem Alsalem, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women. Madrigal-Borloz described the Scottish bill as a "significant step forward", while Alsalem said it "would potentially open the door for violent males who identify as men to abuse the process of acquiring a gender certificate and the rights that are associated with it", a view that was disputed by Madrigal-Borloz, who said it would bring Scotland in line with international human right standards.

Stage 3 vote

The bill was voted on by the full parliament on 22 December 2022 and passed by a majority of 86 to 39, with 0 abstentions and 4 members not voting. The announcement of the result was accompanied by cheers from supporters in the chamber, and shouts of "shame on you" from protesters in the public gallery.

Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill – Stage 3
Party Votes for Votes against Abstained Did Not Vote
Conservative 3 28
Labour 18 2 2
Liberal Democrats 4
SNP 54 9 1
Scottish Green 7
No Party Affiliation (Presiding Officer) 1
Total 86 39 0 4

Royal assent

United Kingdom legislation
The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill (Prohibition on Submission for Royal Assent) Order 2023
Statutory Instrument
Citation2023 No. 41
Introduced byAlister Jack, Secretary of State for Scotland
Dates
Made17 January 2023
Laid before Parliament17 January 2023
Commencement18 January 2023
Other legislation
Made underScotland Act 1998
Status: Current legislation
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted

On 16 January 2023, Scotland Secretary Alister Jack announced that the he would make an order under section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, which would prevent the bill from proceeding to royal assent. Jack cited concerns that the bill would adversely impact the UK-wide Equality Act 2010 as the reason for the tabling of the motion before the Westminster Parliament; equal opportunities are a reserved matter under the Scotland Act. The order was made on 17 January 2023 and entered into force on the next day. This was the first time royal assent was refused to a bill passed by the Scottish Parliament since its creation in 1999. As similar powers regarding the Senedd and Northern Ireland Assembly have never been used, this represents the first post-legislative veto of a bill since Queen Anne refused assent to the Scottish Militia Bill in 1708.

Opinion on the bill

Support

The bill was supported by feminist, LGBT, and human rights campaign organisations such as Amnesty International, Stonewall, Rape Crisis Scotland, Equality Network, Engender, Scottish Trans Alliance, and Scottish Women's Aid. The vast majority of SNP and Scottish Labour parliamentarians, as well as all Scottish Green and Scottish Liberal Democrat MSPs supported the bill, as did three of the Scottish Conservative members.

The bill is similar to the one adopted in the Republic of Ireland. In Northern Ireland, the bill was supported by Sinn Féin, the Alliance Party, and the Social Democratic and Labour Party, whose politicians and MPs raised the possibility of adopting a similar bill.

Opposition

The bill was opposed by the Scottish Conservatives, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Scotland, For Women Scotland, Fair Play for Women, and LGB Alliance. Nine SNP members voted against the bill, "the biggest rebellion against the government by its own party in the last 15 years". The Minister for Community Safety, the SNP's Ash Regan, resigned prior to the Stage 2 vote, saying she was concerned the bill could have "negative implications for the safety and dignity of women and girls".

Opinion polls

A 2021 poll conducted by Survation, commissioned by Murray Blackburn Mackenzie, who campaign against the reforms, came out with results that a majority (53%) of Scottish voters oppose gender self-identification without a medical diagnosis. The sample size for this poll was 1,028 Scottish residents. A January 2022 poll commissioned for the BBC, conducted by Savanta ComRes, found 57% of Scots supported making it easier to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate; a majority opposed reducing the age for this from 18 to 16. The same poll found that over 40% of people supported self-identification, compared to 37% against it. A 2023 YouGov poll commissioned by The Times found that two thirds of Scottish voters opposed key aspects of the bill, particularly those relating the lowering of the minimum age for applying for a GRC.

Opinion on royal assent

Soon after the passage of the bill, academic commentary began to moot the possibility of an invocation of section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 to block the bill. On 21 December 2022, Dr Michael Foran, a lecturer in public law at the University of Glasgow, floated the idea that the bill could be blocked as it infringed on the operation of reserved matters. On 23 December 2022, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that it would be "completely reasonable" for the United Kingdom government to block the bill, citing concerns for "women and children's safety". On 16 January 2023, in response to continued reports that the government was planning to block the bill, Scotland's first minister Nicola Sturgeon called the prospect an "outrage", and stated the UK government was using transgender people as a "political weapon". Following Jack's announcement in the House of Commons of the UK that the bill would be blocked, Sturgeon said that the dispute would "inevitably end up in court" and that the Scottish government would "vigorously defend" the bill.

Kemi Badenoch, the minister for women and equalities, suggested that gender recognition certificates and associated government documents would no longer be recognised in England and Wales if they were from places "where there is a clear indication that the country now no longer has a system at least as rigorous as those in the Gender Recognition Act 2004." On 17 January 2023, the Westminster government released a policy statement on their decision to invoke Section 35. In the statement they set out three primary reasons why they believed the Scottish bill impinged upon reserved matters: firstly, a potential impact on provision of single-sex services authorised under the Equality Act 2010 as a result of creating "two parallel and very different regimes" for issuing gender recognition certificates; secondly, a potential increased risk of fraudulent applications; thirdly, potential impacts on the operation of the Equality Act 2010.

Both Alister Jack and Kemi Badenoch were invited by the Scottish Parliament's Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee to give evidence about their decision to block the bill, however both refused to attend.

Lord Hope of Craighead, formerly deputy president of the UK Supreme Court defended the legality of the UK government's decision and said that the possibility of success of a legal challenge against the decision by the Scottish Government was "very low". Former Labour shadow attorney general Baroness Chakrabarti, who is personally in favour of the reforms, also defended the legality of the government's decision. Former Labour Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer of Thoroton has tweeted that the UK government’s reasons are not justified.

Evoking memories of Section 28, the legislation that had prohibited the "promotion of homosexuality" by local authorities, Nancy Kelley, the chief executive of Stonewall, and Colin Macfarlane, the LGBTQ+ rights campaign's Scotland director, claimed Sunak was risking "re-toxifying" his government's record on LGBTQ+ rights and introducing "an effective trans travel ban". Kelley and Macfarlane were quoted as saying "the UK government sees trans people as a threat to be contained, not citizens to be respected." A Cabinet Office spokesperson responded by saying that trans people "have not and will not be banned" from entering the UK. LGBTIQ activists criticized the Labour Party and Keir Starmer for not opposing the governing Conservative Party in blocking the bill in the UK. Some who were British unionists were reported to have switched support for Scottish independence, with one being quoted as saying: "Now, I understand that independence is the only way to achieve goals in the face of a highly conservative UK government."

See also

References

  1. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill". Parliament.Scot. The Scottish Parliament. 3 March 2022. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
  2. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: consultation analysis". The Scottish Government. 10 March 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  3. Walker, Peter (17 January 2023). "UK government formally blocks Scotland's gender recognition law". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  4. ^ Fairbairn, Catherine; Pyper, Doug; Balogun, Bukky (17 February 2022). "Gender Recognition Act reform: Consultation and outcome" (PDF). Commons Briefing Papers (9079). House of Commons Library.
  5. "Legal gender recognition in the EU: the journeys of trans people towards full equality". European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  6. Boothman, John; Allardyce, Jason (19 December 2021). "Ministers face public backlash over gender recognition reform plans". The Sunday Times. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  7. "Meeting of the Parliament". Official Report. 2 (5 February 2004). Scottish Parliament: 5664.
  8. ^ "Policy: LGBTI and gender recognition". The Scottish Government. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  9. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: A consultation". Scottish Government. 17 December 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  10. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: consultation". Scottish Government. 17 December 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  11. Logan, Caitlin. "GRA Bill Scotland: Five trans people on what the legislation means to them". The National. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  12. "SNP Manifesto 2016: our action for LGBTI people". SNP. 2016. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  13. Duffy, Nick (21 December 2021). "Move to system 'closer to self-declaration' for gender recognition, MPs recommend". i. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  14. ^ Young, Gregor (20 August 2021). "SNP-Green deal to bring in gender reform bill in 'first year' of parliament". thenational.scot. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  15. Davidson, Gina (7 September 2021). "Nicola Sturgeon confirms gender recognition reform back on legislative agenda". The Scotsman. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
  16. "Gender recognition reform bill tabled at Holyrood". BBC. 3 March 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  17. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Delegated Powers Memorandum" (PDF). Scottish Parliament. 2 March 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  18. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Policy Memorandum" (PDF). Scottish Parliament. 2 March 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  19. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Statements on Legislative Competence" (PDF). Scottish Parliament. 2 March 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  20. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill Financial Memorandum" (PDF). Parliament.Scot. 2 March 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  21. "MSPs call for views on Gender Recognition Reform Bill". Law Society of Scotland. 22 March 2022. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  22. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill". Parliament.Scot. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  23. "Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee: Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1" (PDF). Parliament.Scot. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  24. ^ "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill Financial Memorandum". Parliament.Scot. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  25. ^ Garton-Crosbie, Abbi (6 October 2022). "Majority of Scottish Parliament committee backs principles of GRA reform". The National. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  26. Brooks, Libby (27 October 2022). "SNP suffers biggest ever backbench revolt over transgender bill". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  27. "Chamber and committees - Motion ref. S6M-06459 - Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill". Scottish Parliament. Retrieved 15 December 2022.
  28. "Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]; Meeting date: Tuesday, 15 November 2022". 15 November 2022. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  29. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill as amended at stage 2" (PDF). 22 November 2022. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  30. Hunter, Ross (22 November 2022). "Gender reform bill moves on to final stage of Holyrood scrutiny". The National. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
  31. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill Financial Memorandum" (PDF). Parliament.Scot. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  32. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill". Parliament.Scot. The Scottish Parliament. 22 December 2022. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
  33. McCurdy, Rebecca (28 November 2022). "Nicola Sturgeon urged to pause gender reform plans following UN women's safety concerns". The Scotsman. Retrieved 11 December 2022 – via MSN.
  34. "Women's and Human Rights organisations restate support for Gender Recognition Reform Bill". Amnesty International UK. Amnesty International. 30 November 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2022.
  35. Hunter, Ross (8 December 2022). "Scottish Human Rights Commission combat gender reform concerns". The National. Retrieved 11 December 2022.
  36. "UN expert on gender identity calls on Scottish Parliament to adopt Gender Recognition Reform Bill". United Nations Human Rights: Office of the High Commissioner. 16 December 2022. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
  37. "Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee: Monday 19 December 2022". Scottish Parliament. 19 December 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  38. "UN chief backs Scottish government's gender recognition reforms". BBC News. 16 December 2022. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  39. "Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) [Draft] Meeting date: Thursday, December 22, 2022". Scottish Parliament. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  40. "Changing gender to be made easier in Scotland". BBC News. 23 December 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
  41. "UK government to block Scottish gender bill". BBC News. 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  42. "UK government blocks Scotland's gender reform bill in constitutional first". Sky News. 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  43. "Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill: statement from Alister Jack". GOV.UK. 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  44. "The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill (Prohibition on Submission for Royal Assent) Order 2023". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  45. Torrance, David (16 January 2023). "Section 35 of the Scotland Act and vetoing devolved legislation". House of Commons Library.
  46. Horne, Marc (31 May 2022). "Feminist campaigners say trans and women's rights 'inter-connected'". The Herald. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  47. "Gender recognition reform bill tabled at Holyrood". BBC News. 3 March 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  48. ^ Ramsay, Adam (17 January 2023). "Can the UK survive Westminster's attack on trans rights?". openDemocracy. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  49. "Gender recognition reform bill tabled at Holyrood". BBC. 3 March 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  50. "Bishops highlight concerns over Gender Reform Bill". Archdiocese of Edinburgh. 19 December 2022. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  51. Matchett, Conor (19 December 2022). "Catholic bishops urge MSPs to vote against Gender Bill as LGBT+ groups unite in support". The Scotsman. Retrieved 22 December 2022.
  52. Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart; McMillan, Fraser (2022). "'Protect the women!' Trans-exclusionary feminist issue framing and support for transgender rights". Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12484.
  53. McLaughlin, Mark (23 December 2022). "Nine Nationalists defy Nicola Sturgeon on gender reform in record revolt". The Times.
  54. "Scotland gender recognition reform bill: MPs approve law that makes it easier to change gender". Euronews. 23 December 2022.
  55. Morrison, Hamish (27 October 2022). "SNP minister QUITS in protest over transgender law reform bid". The National. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  56. Cowan, Sharon; Giles, Harry Josephine; Hewer, Rebecca; Kaufmann, Becky; Kenny, Meryl; Morris, Sean; Baines, Katie Nicoll (February 2021). "Sex and gender equality law and policy: a response to Murray, Hunter Blackburn and Mackenzie". Scottish Affairs. 30 (1): 74–95. doi:10.3366/scot.2020.0347.
  57. "Majority of Scots against gender 'self-ID' plans". Holyrood. 14 December 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  58. Richards, Xander (17 February 2022). "Scots support gender reform but reject some proposals – the polling results in depth". The National. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
  59. Andrews, Kieran. "Two thirds of voters oppose SNP's gender reform plans". ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  60. Foran, Michael (21 December 2022). "Michael Foran: Sex, Gender, and the Scotland Act". UK Constitutional Law Association. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  61. Daisley, Stephen (23 December 2022). "Are Holyrood and Westminster heading for another Supreme Court showdown?". The Spectator. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  62. Walker, Peter; Stacey, Kiran; Brooks, Libby (23 December 2022). "Rishi Sunak confirms UK could block Scotland's gender recognition bill". The Guardian.
  63. Penna, Dominic (22 December 2022). "Rishi Sunak says Government could block Nicola Sturgeon's gender Bill". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 23 December 2022.
  64. "Gender bill veto would be an outrage – Sturgeon". BBC News. 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  65. "Nicola Sturgeon says gender reform row will go to court". BBC News. 17 January 2023. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
  66. P Walker and L Brooks (17 January 2023). "Court battle looms as UK ministers block Scottish gender recognition law". theguardian.com. Guardian. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  67. "The legal arguments over Holyrood's gender reforms". bbc.co.uk. BBC. 17 January 2023. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  68. R Hunter (19 January 2023). "'Absolute disgrace': Alister Jack snubs Holyrood committee invite". thenational.scot. The National. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  69. A Garton-Crobie (23 January 2023). "Kemi Badenoch declines invitation to Holyrood committee". thenational.scot. The National. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  70. "Government's s 35 order reasons prompt further argument". Law Society of Scotland. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  71. "https://twitter.com/smyth_chris/status/1614906550849609728". Twitter. Retrieved 18 January 2023. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  72. "Gender row legal challenge likely to fail – judge". bbc.co.uk. BBC. 18 January 2023. Retrieved 18 January 2023.
  73. Brooks, Libby (10 January 2023). "UK review of gender recognition list risks 'trans travel ban'". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
Categories: