Revision as of 21:21, 1 February 2023 editGizzyCatBella (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,604 edits →RfC: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:39, 1 February 2023 edit undoGizzyCatBella (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,604 editsm Reverted edits by GizzyCatBella (talk) to last version by RobertskyTag: RollbackNext edit → | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
== Requested move at ] == | == Requested move at ] == | ||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 04:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 04:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
== RfC == | |||
Please see -->] <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 21:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:39, 1 February 2023
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Belarus and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Belarus NA‑class | |||||||
|
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT
To Do List
To-do list for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Belarus: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2020-09-23
|
FAR for National emblem of Belarus
I have nominated National emblem of Belarus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
AfD
Hi. You may or may not be interested in this AfD. Thanks. Lugnuts 08:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliableI have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Misplaced Pages. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I need some sources to add
Hello, I'm looking for some help with my article here. This is what I need:
- Sources
- Feedback
- Pictures
Thank you! DawnTheFirst (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Belarusian rubel#Requested move 11 September 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Belarusian rubel#Requested move 11 September 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 04:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Categories: