| Revision as of 08:52, 24 February 2022 editWOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs)Bots158,219 editsm Fix misnested tag lint errors← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:07, 5 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Useless article ] 09:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Useless article ] 09:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', useless. --]]]] 15:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', useless. --]]]] 15:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. ]] 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. ]] 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Per above. -- ] 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Per above. -- ] 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:07, 5 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Angr/talk 14:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Article purity
I find very little instances of this terminology to mean as such. Unless it means "purity of an article", which we don't need an encyclopedia or dictionary for! Delete -- Perfecto 08:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Useless article Kyle sb 09:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, useless. --Terence Ong 15:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. dbtfz 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. -- Alpha269 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.