Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia Of Stupid: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:59, 30 August 2022 editJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors371,819 edits Fix Linter errors.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:32, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
Line 19: Line 19:
*'''Move''' as per above.--] 21:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Move''' as per above.--] 21:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' It has major ] problems. ] 20:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' It has major ] problems. ] 20:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 23:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. --''']]]''' <small>]</small> 23:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Move''' per Dgies. It's perfectly appropriate to keep unencyclopedic material of interest to Wikipedians in the project namespace. -]<sup>(])</sup> 09:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Move''' per Dgies. It's perfectly appropriate to keep unencyclopedic material of interest to Wikipedians in the project namespace. -]<sup>(])</sup> 09:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Move''' per GTBacchus. ''(]])'' 10:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Move''' per GTBacchus. ''(]])'' 10:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:32, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to WP and delete. Mailer Diablo 10:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Of Stupid

This site does not appear notable (WP:WEB) outside of a rather limited sub-community. Additionally this article falls well foul of WP:V and is likely in conflict with WP:NOR. As well, it is very likely that this article meets the requirements for vanity deletion (see the specific vanity reason on WP's deletion policy) as there are very likely editors who edit on Encyclopedia of Stupid who concurrently edit the Misplaced Pages article that corresponds to it (in conflict of interest). Hardvice 11:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.