Misplaced Pages

:Featured picture candidates/London ISS: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:39, 17 September 2010 editCommonsDelinker (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,014,335 editsm Replacing London_iss_c1.jpg with File:London_Night.jpg (by Túrelio because: exact or scaled-down duplicate).← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:07, 10 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
Line 2: Line 2:
] from the ]]] ] from the ]]]
''This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.'' ''This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.''
* '''Oppose'''. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ] &bull; ] 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) * '''Oppose'''. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ] &bull; ] 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
* '''Oppose'''. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. ]|] 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC) * '''Oppose'''. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. ]|] 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
* Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. ] 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) * Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. ] 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:07, 10 February 2023

London ISS

London from the ISS

This image was previously a featured picture and was renominated as it never went through the featured picture candidates process.

  • Oppose. Lovely image, shame about the clouds. ed g2s • talk 03:04, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Sadly, though. It'd be a really nice image if it weren't so darn blurry over more than half of it. grendel|khan 09:18, 2004 Dec 22 (UTC)
  • Support. Keep it. You're still able to make out many interesting features from it. Enochlau 10:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose Sadly tooo blury ] 12:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose--ZayZayEM 00:51, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support -- it is striking how much this resembles fractured glass. --Elijah 05:50, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
  • Support - Though not perfect its interesting. I also don't like the blurred elements and scan lines, but it is still more real and direct than the Earthlights composite. - Solipsist 11:20, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. -Lommer | 08:53, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Neutrality 06:53, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Nice Dmn / Դմն 00:19, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose. James F. (talk) 08:32, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Oppose Much too blurry to give me any pleasure - Adrian Pingstone 11:14, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Not retained as a featured picture: +5 / -7 - Solipsist 20:16, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)