Misplaced Pages

Talk:Enterobiasis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:09, 12 February 2023 editPhiloserf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,276 edits Assessment: banner shell, −Sanitation, −WP1.0 (Rater)← Previous edit Revision as of 18:09, 12 February 2023 edit undoPhiloserf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,276 edits Assessment: −banner shell (Rater)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}} {{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |1=
{{WikiProject Medicine |class=Redirect |importance=NA |dermatology=yes}} {{WikiProject Medicine |class=Redirect |importance=NA |dermatology=yes}}
}}


==Appendicitis== ==Appendicitis==

Revision as of 18:09, 12 February 2023

Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Enterobiasis.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Dermatology Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Appendicitis

This statement may be getting confused with another 'fact' - approximately 30% of all appendicitis patients are found to be infested with worms, so possibly not the cause of the appendicitis, but something found at surgery Ianguy 01:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

30% is serious enough to demand a search for a causal relationship. Are there any such studies done recently? It something on should look out for... BroVic (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Why have Notes and References when the notes just lead to the references?

I suggest to re-arrange it so that citations lead directly to the references, rather than to the notes first and then to the references. As far as I know, notes are meant to be look footnotes, but not like normal citations. EvM-Susana (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Makes a lot of sense. BroVic (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Garlic

Wow, I've heard before a mention of the efficacy of garlic in the management of helminthic infections. This is really worth looking into, especially garlic is food based and without (serious!) side effects. BroVic (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Categories: