| Revision as of 14:54, 19 February 2023 editTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits →Polish version: +Tag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:56, 19 February 2023 edit undoTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits →Polish version: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :* A list of books published by the journal. | :* A list of books published by the journal. | ||
| ] (]) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | ] (]) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :Piotrus, if you find that there are reliable historians — though I doubt that you understand the term — who admire Glaukopis, feel free to add them. But otherwise, I take a dim view of your shenanigans. ] (]) 14:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:56, 19 February 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glaukopis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
To use
- 10.18318/td.2016.en.1.4
TrangaBellam (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Polish version
It has no information that suggests this en-wiki article to be NPOV. My analysis of the paragraphs:
- An unsourced paragraph on the aims of the journal, probably quoted from their website.
- An unsourced paragraph about the various people who are affiliated to them, probably quoted from their website.
- A paragraph that vouches for the reliability of the journal by citing a communique from a Polish Ministry. Then, there are details about accessing back-issues.
- A one-line paragraph about an award by (arguably) the party-magazine of PiS.
- A one-line paragraph about their EiC(s), probably quoted from their website.
- A list of books published by the journal.
TrangaBellam (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Piotrus, if you find that there are reliable historians — though I doubt that you understand the term — who admire Glaukopis, feel free to add them. But otherwise, I take a dim view of your shenanigans. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)