| Revision as of 13:09, 9 March 2007 editHarej bot (talk | contribs)Bots21,332 edits age category -- automated notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:40, 10 March 2007 edit undoVercalos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,153 edits -archivingNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | |||
| ==Balino-Antimod== | |||
| Were you talking about me? There's nothing wrong with my name, it's actually a surname. It's best you just relax and not cause trouble friend--] 05:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Antimod has a secret meaning, not telling. But Balino, as Sugaar knows, is a surname.--] 05:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandal at Khoikhoi's talk page. == | |||
| Thanks. I would never delete an insult on someone else's talk page, except if it was full of obscenities like this one was. I do not think it is controversial to say that I also recognized part of the IP number. Khoikhoi has since found out more about {{user|66.36.141.28}}- you may have a look at the user page of the gentleman.--] 11:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry == | |||
| Sorry about that. When I saw the page, I only looked at the picture and thought it was something analagous to the Fleshlight. When I looked more closely, that's why I freaked out and nuked it.—] (]) 07:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I must admit, that was one of the funniest discussions I've ever had on Misplaced Pages.--] 07:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, but I am saddened to tell you that I requested that it be sent off into a packet of space where no one will read it again. Too embarassing :P—] (]) 07:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'd noticed. I even know who purged it from your history.. I would have archived it for pure amusement value, but I wouldn't want to bother you(even if I did, I would have kept the names anonymous, however).--] 07:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Hi== | |||
| Thank you for correcting me - I'd never done put a warning template on anything, and I'm afraid I'm still confused about templates in general. | |||
| Since I'm here - can you tell me which welcome template has the automatic "this is an IP address, checkuser, whois, yada-yada" with it? Or is that just an admin template? | |||
| Thanks again, | |||
| ] 07:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, Vercalos (she says as she smacks her forehead, because she knew that one), I'll be more careful next time. I didn't cut and paste the whole code though, which is a big improvement! Cheers.] 08:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==User warnings== | |||
| yes i will - i just trying to avoid attackts by giving them the link to my page. ] 09:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok yes, i will do that aswell. where is the warning templeate page? Also do I have to warn them when reverting vandalisum or can someone else do it? ] 10:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::thanks for your help! ] 10:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth Federation == | |||
| Hi. I read your comment on the 3RR board, claiming Itake at least had argued his point and it should have been gone through more thoroughly on the talk page. Have you read that ] lately? It is quite apparent he did't have a clue about what he was talking about, to be honest. ] (] ° ]) 10:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : With 20 or so sources on my part, and ''none'' on your part, its quite obvious who has a "clue". ] 20:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == My Edits on the Jack Thompson article == | |||
| *Confused Look* It wasn't a personal attack. I'm not even entirely sure what gave you that impression. It's not like I deleted the whole article and replaced it with JACK THOMPSON'S A DOUCHE LOL. The thing I put actually happened.--] 13:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| EDIT: Wait, you're talking about the TALK page. Well, I thought that it was okay to be opinionated in the discussion threads.--] 13:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Would you mind commenting on this issue? == | |||
| -] 17:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Merry Christmas! == | |||
| <div style="padding: 10px; background: #ff0000; border: 6px solid #090; color: #ffffff;"> | |||
| '''''<font color="Green">Merry Christmas, and</font>''''' <font color="Green">'''''May the Edit be with you, always.'''''</font> ]-<font color="Green">]</font> ] 20:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <center>]</center> | |||
| </div> | |||
| == ] & ] == | |||
| Hi Vercalos. I just wanted to throw in my two cents before darting off for visions of sugarplums, &c. I think you jumped the gun on vandal-templating ] for their naughty list commentary. While I agree with you that it is original research & doesn't belong in the article, it seems to me that it was a good faith edit not deserving of even the low level warning you gave out. I've caught myself a bunch of times just throwing a template response out on reflex. I mostly wanted to mention it here since I commented on ]. Cheers --] 04:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: ] == | == Re: ] == | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 10 March 2007
- February 2006 Archive
- March 2006 Archive
- October 2006 Archive
- November 2006 Archive
- December 2006 Archive
Re: Bully (video game)
Yeah, I realize it was referring to a quote in that movie - I probably should have been more clear to the original editor that the reason I reverted it was per WP:Profanity - "Words and images that would be considered offensive, profane, or obscene by typical Misplaced Pages readers should be used if and only if their omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternatives are available." There were plenty of non-profane "band camp" quotes from that film that could have been used as opposed to the vulgar one that was chosen (though I admit that final one was the most memorable). - RJASE1 13:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Feel free to do whatever you think is right regarding the article. - RJASE1 03:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Age category
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
- Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
- Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 13:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)