< Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration | InShaneee Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:10, 10 March 2007 editNewyorkbrad (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,481 edits →Trolling: question for Tony Sidaway← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:17, 10 March 2007 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 editsm →Trolling: in his very first edits,Next edit →
Line 102:		Line 102:

	:'''Comment by parties:'''		:'''Comment by parties:'''
	:: This is a suggestion based on the observation that the coincidence involved here is rather outrageous: chap suddenly shows up and anonymously edit wars with administrator, who overreacts,then the troll and his mates play merry hell until they gets an arbitration case. Whilst the outcome might possibly be advantageous to Misplaced Pages, such behavior (and the evidence for this is mounting) cannot ever be condoned. --] 22:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)		:: This is a suggestion based on the observation that the coincidence involved here is rather outrageous: chap suddenly shows up and, in his very first edits, anonymously edit wars with administrator, who overreacts,then the troll and his mates play merry hell until they gets an arbitration case. Whilst the outcome might possibly be advantageous to Misplaced Pages, such behavior (and the evidence for this is mounting) cannot ever be condoned. --] 22:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
	::: I'd add that it's rather suspicious that Worldtraveller supposedly doesn't edit Misplaced Pages for months, then shows up and starts edit warring--and with an administrator, on a topic for which the administrator in question is known to have an interest. I don't say that the administrator in question is without sin, but there's a much, much more serious question here: what on earth is the Scoobie Gang up to? --] 23:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)		::: I'd add that it's rather suspicious that Worldtraveller supposedly doesn't edit Misplaced Pages for months, then shows up and starts edit warring--and with an administrator, on a topic for which the administrator in question is known to have an interest. I don't say that the administrator in question is without sin, but there's a much, much more serious question here: what on earth is the Scoobie Gang up to? --] 23:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:17, 10 March 2007

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies, Arbitrators will vote at /Proposed decision. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Motions and requests by the parties

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Questions to the parties

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Trolling

1) Problems with Misplaced Pages should be addressed by discussion, rather than piecemeal attempts to entrap and discredit other editors.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

This is a suggestion based on the observation that the coincidence involved here is rather outrageous: chap suddenly shows up and, in his very first edits, anonymously edit wars with administrator, who overreacts,then the troll and his mates play merry hell until they gets an arbitration case. Whilst the outcome might possibly be advantageous to Misplaced Pages, such behavior (and the evidence for this is mounting) cannot ever be condoned. --Tony Sidaway 22:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I'd add that it's rather suspicious that Worldtraveller supposedly doesn't edit Misplaced Pages for months, then shows up and starts edit warring--and with an administrator, on a topic for which the administrator in question is known to have an interest. I don't say that the administrator in question is without sin, but there's a much, much more serious question here: what on earth is the Scoobie Gang up to? --Tony Sidaway 23:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment by others:

Um ... the "Scoobie Gang"?? Newyorkbrad 23:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: