Revision as of 20:31, 29 January 2005 editAnyFile (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users652 editsm Correct some wiki errors← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:28, 30 January 2005 edit undoWoggly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,774 edits some corrections, still needs major cleanup and fact checkingNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
'''Gershom Scholem''' (born ] ] in ], died ], ] in Jerusalem) was a ]-born, | '''Gershom Scholem''' (born ] ] in ], died ], ] in Jerusalem) was a ]-born, | ||
] philosopher and historian. | ] philosopher and historian. | ||
The precocius |
The precocius interest of the young Scholem in Jewish traditions was strongly | ||
opposed by his father, Arthur. But thanks to his mother's intervention, he was allowed to study the ] and the ] with an orthodox rabbi. Scholem was no less attracted by secular and socialist ]. | |||
adversed by his father, Arthur. | |||
⚫ | He studied mathematics, philosophy and Hebrew language at the university of | ||
Thanks to his mother's mediation, he could learn the Hebrew language and | |||
]. During his studies he met ] and ]. In this period he became friends with ], ], ] and ]. He was in ] in ] with ] and he was admitted to the local university. In this city he met ], who would later | |||
study the ] with an orthodox rabbi. | |||
he was, on the other hand, like in a stange contrast, actracted also by the | |||
laical and socialist Zionism, and he enter in the '']'' group. | |||
⚫ | He studied mathematics, |
||
]. In the universitarian environmenthe met ] and | |||
]. In this period he become friend with ], ], | |||
] and Zalman Shazar (who was already called Zalman Rubaschoff in this | |||
period and who wold be the future president of Israel state). He was in | |||
] in ] with ] and he was admitted to | |||
the local university. In this city he met Elsa Burckhardt, who would later | |||
become his first wife. He came back in ] in ], and he got a | become his first wife. He came back in ] in ], and he got a | ||
degree in ] at the University of ]. | degree in ] at the University of ]. | ||
He emigrated to |
He emigrated to Palestine in ], where he became director <!-- (?) --> | ||
of the Department of Hebrew of the ] <!-- I have | of the Department of Hebrew of the ] <!-- I have | ||
some doubt on the traslation of this point --> | some doubt on the traslation of this point --> | ||
He became first professor for Jewish mysticism at the university in 1933 at | He became first professor for Jewish mysticism at the university in 1933 at | ||
the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. | the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. | ||
Line 51: | Line 40: | ||
He married Fania Freud. | He married Fania Freud. | ||
After the |
After the birth of the state of Israel, he was elected president of the Nationa Academy of Science. In ] he was given the title of emeritus professor of the Hebrew University. | ||
Accademy. <!-- ? check the spell --> In ] he got the title of emeritus | |||
professor of the Hebrew University. | |||
He died on ] ]. | He died on ] ]. | ||
Scholem based his |
Scholem based his historiographical approach on the study of Jewish | ||
] with direct contrast to the approach of |
] with direct contrast to the approach of the ] school | ||
of the '']'' (Science of Judaism). The analysis of the Judaism of this school | of the '']'' (Science of Judaism). The analysis of the Judaism of this school | ||
has two important problems, | has two important problems, | ||
-<!-- in the Italian is carenze that is scarcity --> | -<!-- in the Italian is carenze that is scarcity --> | ||
according to Scholem's opinion, | according to Scholem's opinion, | ||
* It study Judaism as a |
* It study Judaism as a dead object put on a gloss of a microscope rather than as a living organism. | ||
* It does not take into consideration the proper ''foundations'' of Judaism. | * It does not take into consideration the proper ''foundations'' of Judaism. | ||
The irrational force that make the religion a living thing. | The irrational force that make the religion a living thing. | ||
In Scholem's opinion, the mythical and |
In Scholem's opinion, the mythical and mistical components are as important as | ||
the rational ones. He wanted not to follow the same path of who had adopted <!-- | the rational ones. He wanted not to follow the same path of those who had adopted <!-- | ||
embraced --> the mysticism but not the history <!-- Or story ??? --> |
embraced --> the mysticism but not the history <!-- Or story ??? -->. In particular he was in disagreement with ]. He | ||
Jewishes. In particular he was in disagreement with ]. He | |||
criticize his personalization of the cabalistic concepts, his ignorance of the | criticize his personalization of the cabalistic concepts, his ignorance of the | ||
history, of the Hebrew language and of the ] of the | history, of the Hebrew language and of the ] of the | ||
Jewish people. | Jewish people. | ||
In the '']'' of Scholem the |
In the '']'' of Scholem the research for the Jewish mysticism | ||
could not be |
could not be seperated from its historical context. He started from something similar | ||
to the ''']''' of ] he arrived to | to the ''']''' of ] he arrived to | ||
include a lot of the less normative aspects of the Judaism in the "public" | include a lot of the less normative aspects of the Judaism in the "public" | ||
Line 82: | Line 68: | ||
the one of the <!-- ? --> Wissenschaft, ], some more some | the one of the <!-- ? --> Wissenschaft, ], some more some | ||
less directly. Different from this, the <!-- ?? --> aginst-to-history views | less directly. Different from this, the <!-- ?? --> aginst-to-history views | ||
(''gegengeschichtlich'') of Scholem make the concept of |
(''gegengeschichtlich'') of Scholem make the concept of tradition a strong link | ||
<!-- or bond --> | <!-- or bond --> | ||
between the yesterday's Jews and the today' Jews. (adoption | between the yesterday's Jews and the today' Jews. (The adoption | ||
of |
of Zionism) | ||
Specifically Scholem thinks the Jewish history is made, more or less, of three | Specifically Scholem thinks the Jewish history is made, more or less, of three | ||
periods: | periods: | ||
#During the ''Biblical period'' |
#During the ''Biblical period'', ] battles ], | ||
without |
without completely defeating it. | ||
# |
#During the Talmudic period some of the institutions ‐ for examples the notion | ||
of the ] power of the accomplishment the |
of the ] power of the accomplishment of the Sacraments ‐ | ||
are removed in favour of the purer concept of the divine ]. | are removed in favour of the purer concept of the divine ]. | ||
<!-- or trascendency --> | <!-- or trascendency --> | ||
#in the ''medioeval period'' the impossibility to conciliate the abstract | #in the ''medioeval period'' the impossibility to conciliate the abstract | ||
] of the ] with the personal God of the |
] of the ] with the personal God of the Bible led the | ||
Jewish <!-- ? --> thinkers, as ], trying to elimiate the remaining | Jewish <!-- ? --> thinkers, as ], trying to elimiate the remaining | ||
of the |
of the myth, to alter the figure of the living God. From this time the | ||
mysticism, as efforts to find again <!-- or recover --> the Godness essence | mysticism, as efforts to find again <!-- or recover --> the Godness essence | ||
of their fathers, spread out. | of their fathers, spread out. | ||
Line 106: | Line 92: | ||
thought that was | thought that was | ||
that the messianic <!-- ? --> movement of | that the messianic <!-- ? --> movement of | ||
the ] of the ] <!-- ? --> was developed from | the ] of the ] <!-- ? --> was developed from | ||
the medioeval ] of ]. | the medioeval ] of ]. | ||
In order to neutralize the sabattianism, as a Hegel's |
In order to neutralize the sabattianism, as a Hegel's synthesis, the | ||
] |
] emerged. | ||
Many of the people that had joined the ] because they had seen in | Many of the people that had joined the ] because they had seen in | ||
it |
it an orthodox congregation considered it scandalous that their community should be associated thus with an heretical movement. | ||
have a so close relation with an ehretical movement. | |||
In the same way Scholem made the hypotesis that the source of the |
In the same way Scholem made the hypotesis that the source of the 13th century Qabbalah was an hypothetical Jewish gnosticism, preceding the Christian gnosticism. | ||
Christian gnosticism. | |||
The |
The historiographical approach of Scholem involved a linguistic theory too. | ||
In contranst to ], Scholen belived in the power of the | |||
language to invoke supernatural reality. <!-- or phenomena -->. In contrast to | language to invoke supernatural reality. <!-- or phenomena -->. In contrast to | ||
], he put the Hebrew language in a |
], he put the Hebrew language in a privileged | ||
position |
position in respect the other languages, as it is the only language able to | ||
reveal the divine truth. Scholem considered the cabbalists | |||
as interpreters of a pre-existent ''linguistic'' revelation. | as interpreters of a pre-existent ''linguistic'' revelation. | ||
Revision as of 09:28, 30 January 2005
Gershom Scholem (born December 5 1897 in Berlin, died February 21, 1982 in Jerusalem) was a German-born, Jewish philosopher and historian. Scholem studied the roots of the Kabbalah and Jewish mysticism, founding a professorship for the study of the Kabbalah in Jerusalem. He wrote a famous biography of Sabbatai Zevi.
Born Gerhard Scholem, Scholem studied mathematics, philosophy and oriental languages. He wrote his doctor's thesis on the subject of the most ancient known kabbalistic text, Sefer ha-Bahir. Drawn to Zionism and influenced by Martin Buber, he emigrated in 1923 to Palestine; here he devoted his time to studying Jewish mysticism and became a librarian, and later a lecturer, at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. He taught the Kabbalah and mysticism from a scientific point of view, and became the first professor for Jewish mysticism at the university in 1933, working in this post until his retirement in 1965.
Scholem's brother Werner was a member of the ultra-left "Fischer-Maslow Group"; he was also a member of the Reichstag, the German parliament, representing the Communist Party (KPD), but was banned from the party and later murdered during the Third Reich.
Scholem died in Jerusalem in 1982, leaving a widow, Fania Scholem.
Works
- Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism 1941
- Jewish Gnosticism, Merkabah Mysticism, and the Talmudic Tradition 1960
- The Messianic Idea in Judaism translated 1971
- Sabbatai Zevi, the Mystical Messiah 1973
- Kabbalah 1974
- On the Mystical Shape of the Godhead : Basic Concepts in the Kabbalah 1997
The following is a traslation of the Italian equivalent article it:Gerschom Scholem
It should be
You must add a |reason=
parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|reason=<Fill reason here>}}
, or remove the Cleanup template.
and merged with the above
Gershom Scholem (born December 5 1897 in Berlin, died February 21, 1982 in Jerusalem) was a German-born, Jewish philosopher and historian. The precocius interest of the young Scholem in Jewish traditions was strongly opposed by his father, Arthur. But thanks to his mother's intervention, he was allowed to study the Hebrew language and the Talmud with an orthodox rabbi. Scholem was no less attracted by secular and socialist Zionism.
He studied mathematics, philosophy and Hebrew language at the university of Berlin. During his studies he met Martin Buber and Walter Benjamin. In this period he became friends with Shmuel Yosef Agnon, Hayim Nahman Bialik, Ahad ha-Am and Zalman Shazar. He was in Bern in 1918 with ] and he was admitted to the local university. In this city he met Elsa Burckhardt, who would later become his first wife. He came back in German in 1919, and he got a degree in semitic languages at the University of Munich.
He emigrated to Palestine in 1922, where he became director of the Department of Hebrew of the Hebrew National Library He became first professor for Jewish mysticism at the university in 1933 at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
He married Fania Freud.
After the birth of the state of Israel, he was elected president of the Nationa Academy of Science. In 1965 he was given the title of emeritus professor of the Hebrew University.
He died on 20th February 1982.
Scholem based his historiographical approach on the study of Jewish mysticism with direct contrast to the approach of the 19th-century school of the Wissenschaft des Judentums (Science of Judaism). The analysis of the Judaism of this school has two important problems, - according to Scholem's opinion,
- It study Judaism as a dead object put on a gloss of a microscope rather than as a living organism.
- It does not take into consideration the proper foundations of Judaism.
The irrational force that make the religion a living thing.
In Scholem's opinion, the mythical and mistical components are as important as the rational ones. He wanted not to follow the same path of those who had adopted the mysticism but not the history . In particular he was in disagreement with Martin Buber. He criticize his personalization of the cabalistic concepts, his ignorance of the history, of the Hebrew language and of the old country of the Jewish people.
In the Weltanschauung of Scholem the research for the Jewish mysticism could not be seperated from its historical context. He started from something similar to the Gegengeschichte of Friedrich Nietzsche he arrived to include a lot of the less normative aspects of the Judaism in the "public" history. This impetus to give justification to the irrational came from, as in the one of the Wissenschaft, Buber, some more some less directly. Different from this, the aginst-to-history views (gegengeschichtlich) of Scholem make the concept of tradition a strong link between the yesterday's Jews and the today' Jews. (The adoption of Zionism)
Specifically Scholem thinks the Jewish history is made, more or less, of three periods:
- During the Biblical period, monotheism battles myth,
without completely defeating it.
- During the Talmudic period some of the institutions ‐ for examples the notion
of the magical power of the accomplishment of the Sacraments ‐ are removed in favour of the purer concept of the divine transcendence.
- in the medioeval period the impossibility to conciliate the abstract
God of the Greek philosophy with the personal God of the Bible led the Jewish thinkers, as Maimonides, trying to elimiate the remaining of the myth, to alter the figure of the living God. From this time the mysticism, as efforts to find again the Godness essence of their fathers, spread out.
The notion of the three periods, with its interactions between irrationals and rationals, lead Scholem to enounce some very controversial arguments. He thought that was that the messianic movement of the 16th century of the Sabattianism was developed from the medioeval Kabbalah of luriana. In order to neutralize the sabattianism, as a Hegel's synthesis, the Hassidism emerged.
Many of the people that had joined the Hassidic movement because they had seen in it an orthodox congregation considered it scandalous that their community should be associated thus with an heretical movement.
In the same way Scholem made the hypotesis that the source of the 13th century Qabbalah was an hypothetical Jewish gnosticism, preceding the Christian gnosticism.
The historiographical approach of Scholem involved a linguistic theory too. In contranst to Buber, Scholen belived in the power of the language to invoke supernatural reality. . In contrast to Benjamin, he put the Hebrew language in a privileged position in respect the other languages, as it is the only language able to reveal the divine truth. Scholem considered the cabbalists as interpreters of a pre-existent linguistic revelation.