| Revision as of 04:09, 19 February 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:10, 19 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,844 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete''' oh, I'm the nominator! - ] ] 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' oh, I'm the nominator! - ] ] 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', fails ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 11:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', fails ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 11:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' textbook ] and ]. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' textbook ] and ]. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom; random examples that don't prove much anyway. — ] <small>]</small> 22:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom; random examples that don't prove much anyway. — ] <small>]</small> 22:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' interested parties should read article by Harold Somers. - ] ] 22:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' interested parties should read article by Harold Somers. - ] ] 22:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:10, 19 March 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 04:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Examples of SYSTRAN machine translation
Original research, not to mention that RTT evaluation is pretty much disproved as a methodology. - FrancisTyers · 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete oh, I'm the nominator! - FrancisTyers · 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk 11:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete textbook original research and indiscriminate information. --Nscheffey 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; random examples that don't prove much anyway. — Haeleth Talk 22:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment interested parties should read this article by Harold Somers. - FrancisTyers · 22:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.