Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/The Tetragrammaton in the Bible: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:19, 24 March 2005 editAeropus II of Macedon (talk | contribs)19 edits →[]← Previous edit Revision as of 18:18, 24 March 2005 edit undoDeathphoenix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,544 edits Comment: This is a blockable offense.Next edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Keep'''-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--] 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep'''-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--] 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''keep''' *'''keep'''
**'''Comment:''' Above is an unsigned vote by {{sust:user|Aeropus II of Macedon}}, which contradicts the current {{Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Iasson/Proposed_decision#Proposed_temporary_injunctions|arbitration injunction]] against him. I believe this offense means he can be blocked for up to a week. --]] 18:18, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:18, 24 March 2005

The Tetragrammaton in the Bible

This article presents original research attempting to rebut a claim made by the Jewish encyclopedia. Although interesting, it is not appropriate for wikipedia. --Kzollman 04:30, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Pure original research, unclear how it could not be. Please note that Iaoue is by the same author, and suffers the same issues. Jayjg 04:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, un-encyclopaedic, POV original essay. Megan1967 07:16, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep --Irishpunktom\ 11:48, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. As it stands, original research. The author should consider submitting the piece to a Peer Review publication. El_C 12:23, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - --Tomtom 16:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--Numerousfalx 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • keep
    • Comment: Above is an unsigned vote by Template:Sust:user, which contradicts the current {{Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Iasson/Proposed_decision#Proposed_temporary_injunctions|arbitration injunction]] against him. I believe this offense means he can be blocked for up to a week. --Deathphoenix 18:18, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)