Misplaced Pages

User talk:14thArmored: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:18, 14 March 2007 editMerope (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,200 editsm Reverted edits by 14thArmored (talk) to last version by Bsroiaadn← Previous edit Revision as of 03:19, 14 March 2007 edit undoReyBrujo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,722 edits WarningsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:

Hi, and welcome. The edit you are refering to is in the template - in other words, it is a fixed variable used across many pages (it can be changed, but not without upseting a lot of people in the military history project if it is done without discussion). Changing templates will affect not just the 14th Armored Division page, but many, many others as well. However, I do see your point. I invite you to join the ]; we are always looking for new people with an interest in military history. Just add your name to the list of participants, and then you can bring this issue up for discussion on the project talk page.--] 00:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Hi, and welcome. The edit you are refering to is in the template - in other words, it is a fixed variable used across many pages (it can be changed, but not without upseting a lot of people in the military history project if it is done without discussion). Changing templates will affect not just the 14th Armored Division page, but many, many others as well. However, I do see your point. I invite you to join the ]; we are always looking for new people with an interest in military history. Just add your name to the list of participants, and then you can bring this issue up for discussion on the project talk page.--] 00:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


Line 30: Line 29:


] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], you will be ] from editing. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-vandalism4}} --> ] 03:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC) ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], you will be ] from editing. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-vandalism4}} --> ] 03:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

==Warnings==
While you are free to delete warnings from your talk page (it is enough proof for us that you have acknowledged them), calling others "moron" is a personal attack. I notice another administrator blocked you for 24 hours for that. Hopefully you will have enough time to cool down. -- ] 03:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:19, 14 March 2007

Hi, and welcome. The edit you are refering to is in the template - in other words, it is a fixed variable used across many pages (it can be changed, but not without upseting a lot of people in the military history project if it is done without discussion). Changing templates will affect not just the 14th Armored Division page, but many, many others as well. However, I do see your point. I invite you to join the WikiProject Military history; we are always looking for new people with an interest in military history. Just add your name to the list of participants, and then you can bring this issue up for discussion on the project talk page.--Nobunaga24 00:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt reply. I did not join the group you mentioned (I am not much of a joiner.), but I did go to the page, and leave a request that a change be considered. The "LIBERATORS" thank you. 14thArmored 1810 Hours 2 November, 2006
I've removed the entire separator bar that was the issue; there's no particular reason to have it, and trying to get custom terminology for it would be too big a mess, in my opinion. In any case, the (incorrect) terminology is now gone; is this sufficient? Kirill Lokshin 01:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Operation Frühlingserwachen was the last major German offensive of the war. It took place in March 1945 on the Eastern Front, and was carried out by the same troops that fought in the Battle of the Bulge. Please research things more before you revert everything.TheCheeseManCan 17:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Services of supply

Please refer to: http://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/160.html Headquarters Army Service Forces was established nn the War Department by General Order 14, War Department, March 12, 1943. Mfields1 10:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, no problem, we're all here trying to make Misplaced Pages as accurate as possible. I added to the Service of Supply article mainly to improve the J.H.C. Lee article. I still have some things to add to that article. Mfields1 03:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Manual of style - capitalisation

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Misplaced Pages has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to T-34, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Regards, Mr Stephen 23:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore: :
Stop icon
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grant | Talk 02:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack on Grant65

This edit is not acceptable under Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Please review the policy and make sure that you understand it. You should comment at all times on contributions, not contributors - calling someone a "dick head" because you do not agree with their contribution is not acceptable. —Krellis (Talk) 02:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:14thArmored, you will be blocked for vandalism. Bsroiaadn 03:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User talk:14thArmored, you will be blocked from editing. Bsroiaadn 03:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User talk:14thArmored, you will be blocked from editing. Bsroiaadn 03:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Warnings

While you are free to delete warnings from your talk page (it is enough proof for us that you have acknowledged them), calling others "moron" is a personal attack. I notice another administrator blocked you for 24 hours for that. Hopefully you will have enough time to cool down. -- ReyBrujo 03:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)