Revision as of 23:02, 1 May 2023 view sourceMrOllie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,610 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 47.28.97.96 (talk) to last revision by DumbBOTTags: Twinkle Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:42, 2 May 2023 view source 2600:8800:10f:d200:7cf2:be:88f7:48fd (talk) Changed it back to what it actually is. :)Tag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Marxism}} | |||
{{short description|Far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory}} | |||
'''Cultural Marxism''' refers to a school or offshoot of ] that conceives of ] as central to the legitimation of oppression, in addition to the ] factors that ] emphasized.<ref name="Merquior1986">] (1986). ''Western Marxism'', University of California Press/Paladin Books, ISBN 0586084541</ref> An outgrowth of ] (especially ] and the ]) and finding popularity in the 1960s as ], Cultural Marxism argues that what appear as traditional cultural phenomena intrinsic to ], for instance the drive for individual acquisition associated with ], ], the ], ] roles, ] and other forms of ];<ref name="Merquior1986"/> are historically recent developments that help to justify and maintain hierarchy. Cultural Marxists use Marxist methods (historical research, the identification of economic interest, the study of the mutually conditioning relations between parts of a social order) to try to understand the complexity of power in contemporary society and to make it possible to criticise what, cultural Marxists propose, appears natural but is in fact 'ideological'. | |||
{{redirect|Cultural Marxism|"cultural Marxism" in the context of social theory and cultural studies|Marxist cultural analysis}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2022}} | |||
{{use American English|date=October 2020}} | |||
{{Antisemitism sidebar|Canards}} | |||
==Explanation of the "Cultural Marxism" theory== | |||
The term "'''Cultural Marxism'''" refers to a ] ] ] which claims that ] is the basis of continuing academic and intellectual efforts to subvert ].<ref name="Jay">{{cite web |last=Jay |first=Martin |author-link=Martin Jay |title=Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment: The Frankfurt School as Scapegoat of the Lunatic Fringe |url=http://cms.skidmore.edu/salmagundi/backissues/168-169/martin-jay-frankfurt-school-as-scapegoat.cfm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111124045123/http://cms.skidmore.edu/salmagundi/backissues/168-169/martin-jay-frankfurt-school-as-scapegoat.cfm |archive-date=November 24, 2011 |website=Salmagundi Magazine}}</ref><ref name="Jamin">{{cite book |last=Jamin |first=Jérôme |title=The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate |publisher=] |location=London, England |year=2014 |isbn=978-1-137-39619-8 |editor-last=Shekhovtsov |editor-first=Anton |editor-link=Anton Shekhovtsov |pages=84–103 |chapter=Cultural Marxism and the Radical Right |doi=10.1057/9781137396211.0009 |access-date=September 11, 2020 |editor-last2=Jackson |editor-first2=Paul |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VbLSBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA84 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200922220920/https://books.google.com/books?id=VbLSBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA84 |archive-date=September 22, 2020 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref><ref name="Copsey 2015">{{cite book |last1=Richardson |first1=John E. |title=Cultures of Post-War British Fascism |last2=Copsey |first2=Nigel |date=2015 |publisher=] |location=Abingdon, England |isbn=9781317539360 |chapter='Cultural-Marxism' and the British National Party: a transnational discourse |access-date=September 11, 2020 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HIwGCAAAQBAJ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200929062019/https://books.google.com/books?id=HIwGCAAAQBAJ |archive-date=September 29, 2020 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref> The conspiracy theory misrepresents the ] as being responsible for modern ] movements, ], and ], claiming there is an ongoing and intentional ] of Western society via a planned ] that undermines the Christian values of ] and seeks to replace them with the culturally liberal values of the 1960s.<ref name="Jamin"/><ref name="Copsey 2015"/><ref name="Jeffries 2016">{{cite book |last=Jeffries |first=Stuart |year=2016 |title=Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School |location=London, England |publisher=] |pages=6–11 |isbn=9781784785680}}</ref> | |||
{{cquote2|We are, in Marx's terms, "an ensemble of social relations" and we live our lives at the core of the intersection of a number of unequal social relations based on hierarchically interrelated structures which, together, define the historical specificity of the capitalist modes of production and reproduction and underlay their observable manifestations.|Martha E. Gimenez, ''Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy'' <ref>Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy, by Martha E. Gimenez, Published (2001) in ''Race, Gender and Class'', Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 23-33.</ref>}} | |||
According to ] professor and critical theorist ], "Many 20th century Marxian theorists ranging from ], ], ], ], and ] to ] and ] employed the Marxian theory to analyze cultural forms in relation to their production, their imbrications with society and history, and their impact and influences on audiences and social life."<ref name="gseis.ucla">Douglas Kellner, "Cultural Marxism and Cultural Studies,", circa 2004.</ref><ref>Douglas Kellner, "Herbert Marcuse," Illuminations, University of Texas, .</ref> Scholars have employed various types of Marxist ] to analyze cultural artifacts. | |||
Although similarities with the ] propaganda term "]" have been noted, the contemporary conspiracy theory originated in the United States during the 1990s.<ref name="Woods 2019"/><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jay |first=M. |date=2010 |title=Dialectic of counter-enlightenment: The frankfurt school as scapegoat of the lunatic fringe |journal=Salmagundi |volume=168/169 |pages=30–40 |via=ProQuest}}</ref><ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020">{{cite journal |last1=Busbridge |first1=Rachel |last2=Moffitt |first2=Benjamin |last3=Thorburn |first3=Joshua |date=June 2020 |title=Cultural Marxism: Far-Right Conspiracy Theory in Australia's Culture Wars |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2020.1787822 |journal=Social Identities |volume=26 |issue=6 |pages=722–738 |publisher=] |location=London, England |doi=10.1080/13504630.2020.1787822 |s2cid=225713131 |issn=1350-4630 |access-date=October 6, 2020 |archive-date=July 30, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200730085335/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2020.1787822 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{refn|group=note|In its dominant iteration, the US-originating conspiracy holds that a small group of Marxist critical theorists have conspired to destroy Western civilisation by taking over key cultural institutions.}} Originally found only on the far-right political fringe, the term began to enter mainstream discourse in the 2010s and is now found globally.<ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020"/> The conspiracy theory of a Marxist culture war is promoted by ] politicians, ] leaders, political commentators in mainstream print and television media, and ] ],<ref name="Mirrlees 2018">{{cite journal |last=Mirrlees |first=Tanner |date=2018 |title=The Alt-Right's Discourse of 'cultural Marxism': A political Instrument of Intersectional Hate |url=https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403/pdf_55 |journal=Atlantis Journal |volume=39 |issue=1 |publisher=] |location=Halifax, Nova Scotia |access-date=November 5, 2020 |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120536/https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403/pdf_55 |url-status=live}}</ref> and has been described as "a foundational element of the ] worldview".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Elley |first1=Ben |title="The rebirth of the West begins with you!"—Self-improvement as radicalisation on 4chan |journal=Humanities and Social Sciences Communications |date=2021 |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=1–10 |doi=10.1057/s41599-021-00732-x |s2cid=232164033 |language=en |issn=2662-9992 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Scholarly analysis of the conspiracy theory has concluded that it has no basis in fact.<ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020"/><ref name="Braune 2019"/> | |||
===Frankfurt School and critical theory=== | |||
== Origins == | |||
The ] is the name usually used to refer to a group of scholars who have been associated at one point or another over several decades with the ] of the ], including ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. In the 1930s the Institute for Social Research was forced out of Germany by the rise of the ]. In 1933, the Institute left Germany for ]. It then moved to ] in 1934, where it became affiliated with ]. Its journal ''Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung'' was accordingly renamed ''Studies in Philosophy and Social Science''. It was at that moment that much of its important work began to emerge, having gained a favorable reception within American and English ]. | |||
=== Michael Minnicino and the LaRouche Movement === | |||
Michael Minnicino's 1992 essay ''New Dark Age: The Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness' '' has been described as a starting point for the contemporary conspiracy theory in the United States.<ref name="Woods 2019"/><ref name="WoodsCommune"/><ref name=Jay2019>{{Cite book |first=Martin |last=Jay |chapter=Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment: The Frankfurt School as Scapegoat of the Lunatic Fringe |title=Splinters in Your Eye Essays on the Frankfurt School. |date=2020 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-78873-603-9 |pages=151–172 |oclc=1163441655}}</ref><ref name="schillerinstitute.org">{{cite web |last=Minnicino |first=Michael |title=New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness' |url=http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_91-96/921_frankfurt.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180725022941/http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_91-96/921_frankfurt.html |archive-date=July 25, 2018 |access-date=October 6, 2020 |publisher=Schiller Institute}}</ref> Minnicino's interest in the subject derived from his involvement in the ].<ref name="Jay2019" /><ref name="WoodsCommune" /> ] had begun developing conspiracy theories regarding the Frankfurt School in 1974, when he alleged that ] and ] were acting as part of ].<ref name="WoodsCommune" /> Other features of the conspiracy theory had developed across the 1970s and 80s in the movement's magazine, ''],'' according to the researcher Andrew Woods.<ref name="WoodsCommune" /> | |||
Among the key works of the Frankfurt School which applied Marxist categories to the study of culture were Adorno's "On Popular Music," which was written with George Simpson and published in ''Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences'' in 1941. Adorno was worried by signs of conformity in contemporary mass society and also at the conversion of individual artistic expression into the mass production of standardised commodities. He argued that popular music was, by design and promotion, "wholly antagonistic to the ideal of individuality in a free, liberal society",<ref>"". Originally published in: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, New York: Institute of Social Research, 1941, IX, 17-48. See Gordon Welty (1984).</ref> Adorno and Horkheimer's "The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception", originally a chapter in '']'' (1947), which argued that culture reinforced "the absolute power of capitalism",<ref>Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer "Enlightment as mass deception" ''Dialectic of Enlightenment''. London: ], 1979, 120-167 (originally published as: ''Dialektik der Aufklärung''. Amsterdam: Querido, 1947). On-line and . See Gordon Welty (1984).</ref> and "Culture Industry Reconsidered", a 1963 radio lecture by Adorno.<ref>Lecture in the ] over the ] which was published in German in 1967, in '']'', 6, Fall 1975, 12-19 (translated by Anson G. Rabinbach). See Gordon Welty (1984).</ref> | |||
Minnicino's essay argued that late twentieth-century America had become a "New Dark Age" as a result of the abandonment of ] and ] ideals, which he claimed had been replaced in ] with a "tyranny of ugliness". He attributed this to an alleged plot to instill ] in America, carried out in three stages by ], the Frankfurt School, and elite media figures and political campaigners.<ref name="Woods 2019" /> | |||
] in 1976]] | |||
Minnicino asserted there were two aspects of the Frankfurt School plan to destroy ]. Firstly, a cultural critique, by ] and ], to use art and culture to promote ] and replace ] with ]. This included the development of ]ing and advertising techniques to ] the populace and control political campaigning. Secondly, the plan supposedly included attacks on the traditional family structure by ] and ] to promote ], sexual liberation, and ] to subvert ].<ref name="Woods 2019"/> Minnicino claimed the Frankfurt School was responsible for elements of the ] and a "] revolution", distributing ]ic drugs to encourage sexual perversion and promiscuity.<ref name="Woods 2019"/> | |||
After 1945 a number of these surviving Marxists returned to both ] and ]. Adorno and Horkheimer returned to Frankfurt in 1953 and reestablished the Institute. In West Germany in the late 1950s and early 1960s, a revived interest in Marxism produced a new generation of Marxists engaged with analyzing matters such as the cultural transformations taking place under ], the impact of new types of popular music and art on traditional cultures, and maintaining the political integrity of discourse in the ].<ref>e.g. ] (1962 trans 1989) ''The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society, Polity, Cambridge.</ref> This renewed interest was exemplified by the ]. The tradition of thought associated with the Frankfurt School is ]. | |||
After the ] by ], a follower of the conspiracy theory, Minnicino repudiated his own essay.<ref name="Jay2019"/><ref name="WoodsCommune"/> Minnicino wrote, "I still like to think that some of my research was validly conducted and useful. However, I see very clearly that the whole enterprise—and especially the conclusions—was hopelessly deformed by self-censorship and the desire to in some way support Mr. LaRouche’s crack-brained world-view."<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
=== |
===Birmingham School and cultural studies=== | ||
The work of the Frankfurt School and of Marxist thinker ] was particularly influential in the 1960s, and had a major impact on the development of ], especially in Britain. As Douglas Kellner writes:<blockquote>Cultural Marxism was highly influential throughout Europe and the Western world, especially in the 1960s when Marxian thought was at its most prestigious and procreative. Theorists like ] and ] in France, ], ], and others in Italy, ], ], and cohort of 1960s cultural radicals in the English-speaking world, and a large number of theorists throughout the globe used cultural Marxism to develop modes of cultural studies that analyzed the production, interpretation, and reception of cultural artifacts within concrete socio-historical conditions that had contested political and ideological effects and uses. One of the most famous and influential forms of cultural studies, initially under the influence of cultural Marxism, emerged within the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham, England within a group often referred to as the Birmingham School.<ref name="gseis.ucla" /></blockquote> | |||
] and ] were prominent figures of ] in the United States; Weyrich had co-founded right-wing groups including the ], which he led.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":4" /> Weyrich equated ] with Cultural Marxism in a speech to the ] of the Civitas Institute in 1998.<ref name=":4">{{Cite book |last=Bangstad |first=Sindre |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/881366672 |title=Anders Breivik and the Rise of Islamophobia. |date=2014 |publisher=Zed Books |isbn=978-1-78360-009-0 |location=London |pages=87–88 |oclc=881366672}}</ref><ref name=":3" /><ref>{{cite book |first1=David |last1=Neiwert |title=Red Pill, Blue Pill: How to Counteract the Conspiracy Theories That Are Killing Us |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TTXsDwAAQBAJ |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |page=15 |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-63388-627-8 |access-date=November 2, 2020 |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120513/https://books.google.com/books?id=TTXsDwAAQBAJ |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref><ref name="Weyrich" /> He argued that "we have lost the culture war" and that "a legitimate strategy for us to follow is to look at ways to separate ourselves from the institutions that have been captured by the ideology of Political Correctness, or by other enemies of our traditional culture."<ref name="Weyrich">{{cite web |last1=Weyrich |first1=Paul |author1-link=Paul Weyrich|title=Letter to Conservatives by Paul M. Weyrich|url=https://www.nationalcenter.org/Weyrich299.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000411172504/http://www.nationalcenter.org/Weyrich299.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 11, 2000 |website=Conservative Think Tank: The National Center for Public Policy Research |access-date=November 30, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first1=Donald W. |last1=Whisenhunt |title=Reading the Twentieth Century: Documents in American History |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D1p3ykA5AQQC |publisher=] |location=Lanham, Maryland |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-7425-6477-0 |via=] |access-date=November 2, 2020 |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120513/https://books.google.com/books?id=D1p3ykA5AQQC |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Use by current Conservatives=== | |||
For the Free Congress Foundation, Weyrich commissioned Lind, a paleoconservative activist, to write a history of Cultural Marxism, defined as "a brand of ] ... commonly known as ']' or, less formally, Political Correctness."<ref name="Lind">{{cite web |last1=Lind |first1=William S. |title=What is Cultural Marxism? |url=http://www.marylandthursdaymeeting.com/Archives/SpecialWebDocuments/Cultural.Marxism.htm |access-date=April 9, 2015 |website=Maryland Thursday Meeting |archive-date=April 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220401094709/http://www.marylandthursdaymeeting.com/Archives/SpecialWebDocuments/Cultural.Marxism.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=":3" /> In the 2000 speech ''The Origins of Political Correctness'', Lind wrote, "If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the ] and the ], but back to ]. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with ], the parallels are very obvious."<ref name="Bill">{{cite web |last1=Lind |first1=William S. |title=The Origins of Political Correctness |url=http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/ |website=] |access-date=November 8, 2015 |date=February 5, 2000 |archive-date=October 17, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151017014712/http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/ |url-status=live}}</ref>{{Third-party inline|date=April 2023}} | |||
In current politics, the term has also been associated by Conservatives with a set of values that, it is claimed, are in simple contradiction with traditional values of ] and ] religion.<ref>] (2008), </ref> Undermining these is believed to be the true purpose of ] and ], which are then identified with Cultural Marxism. | |||
Lind employed the conspiracy theory to argue that leftist and liberal ideologies were alien to the United States.<ref name="Woods 2019" /> He argued that Lukács and ] had aimed to subvert Western culture because it was an obstacle to the Marxist goal of ]. He alleged that the Frankfurt School under ] had hoped to destroy Western civilization and establish totalitarianism (even though some members had fled ]), using four main strategies. First, Lind said, Horkheimer's critical theory would undermine the authority of family and government while segregating society into opposing groups of victims and oppressors. Second, he said, concepts of the ] and the ] measuring susceptibility to ], developed by Adorno, would be used to accuse Americans with right-wing views of having fascist principles. Third, he said, polymorphous perversity would undermine family structure by promoting ] and ]. Fourth, he characterized ] as saying that left victim-groups should be allowed to speak while groups on the right were silenced.<ref name="Woods 2019" /> Lind said that Marcuse considered a coalition of "], students, ] women, and homosexuals" as a feasible ] of cultural revolution in the 1960s.<ref name="Berkowitz">{{cite web |last1=Berkowitz |first1=Bill |title=Ally of Christian Right Heavyweight Paul Weyrich Addresses Holocaust Denial Conference |url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2002/ally-christian-right-heavyweight-paul-weyrich-addresses-holocaust-denial-conference |website=Southern Poverty Law Center |publisher=SPLC 2003 |access-date=April 19, 2016 |archive-date=April 28, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160428160818/https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2002/ally-christian-right-heavyweight-paul-weyrich-addresses-holocaust-denial-conference |url-status=live}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=April 2023}} Lind also wrote that Cultural Marxism was an example of ].<ref name=":3">{{cite web |last=Rosenberg |first=Paul |title=A User's Guide to 'Cultural Marxism': Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theory, Reloaded |website=] |date=May 5, 2019 |url=https://www.salon.com/2019/05/05/a-users-guide-to-cultural-marxism-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theory-reloaded/ |access-date=June 11, 2019 |archive-date=June 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190611094714/https://www.salon.com/2019/05/05/a-users-guide-to-cultural-marxism-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theory-reloaded/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] brought more attention among ] to Weyrich and Lind's iteration of the conspiracy theory.<ref name="Copsey & Richardson 2015">{{cite book |editor1-last=Copsey |editor1-first=Nigel |editor2-last=Richardson |editor2-first=John E. |title=Cultures of Post-War British Fascism |chapter='Cultural-Marxism' and the British National Party: a transnational discourse |year=2015 |isbn=9781317539360 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HIwGCAAAQBAJ |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=September 29, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200929062019/https://books.google.com/books?id=HIwGCAAAQBAJ |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title='Cultural Marxism' Catching On |url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2003/cultural-marxism-catching |access-date=September 11, 2020 |website=] |archive-date=September 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930043851/https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2003/cultural-marxism-catching |url-status=live}}</ref> Jérôme Jamin refers to Buchanan as the "intellectual momentum"<ref name="survey">{{cite journal |last1=Jamin |first1=Jérôme |title=Cultural Marxism: A survey |journal=Religion Compass |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rec3.12258 |year=2018 |volume=12 |issue=1–2 |pages=e12258 |doi=10.1111/REC3.12258}}</ref> of the conspiracy theory, and to Anders Breivik as the "violent impetus".<ref name="survey"/> Both of them relied on Lind, who edited a multi-authored work called "Political Correctness: A Short History of an Ideology" that Jamin calls the core text that "has been unanimously cited as 'the' reference since 2004."<ref name="survey"/> | |||
Lind and the Free Congress Foundation produced the video ''Political Correctness: The Frankfurt School'' in 1999.<ref name="Jay"/><ref name="Berkowitz"/> It was further distributed by the ], a racist group, which added its own introduction.<ref name="Berkowitz" /> The film includes decontextualized clips of historian ], who was not aware of the nature of the production at the time.<ref name="Jay"/><ref name="LikeUs"/> Jay has since become a recognized expert on the conspiracy theory.<ref name="LikeUs"/> Concerning right-wing exploitation of his statements, Jay wrote, "Those beans I allegedly spilled had been on the plate for a very long time," going on to confirm that the Frankfurt school were Marxists concerned with culture, and that Marcuse promulgated the idea of repressive tolerance.<ref name="Jay"/> However, the conspiracy theory presents an "improverished cartoon version" of these ideas.<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
Jay wrote that Lind's documentary was effective Cultural Marxism ] because it "spawned a number of condensed, textual versions, which were reproduced on a number of radical, right-wing sites."<ref name="Jay"/> Jay further writes: | |||
<blockquote>These, in turn, led to a plethora of new videos, now available on ], which feature an odd cast of pseudo-experts regurgitating exactly the same line. The message is numbingly simplistic: All the 'ills' of modern American culture, from ], ], ], ], ] and ] to the decay of traditional education, and even ], are ultimately attributable to the insidious intellectual influence of the members of the Institute for Social Research who came to America in the 1930s.<ref name="Jay"/></blockquote> | |||
== Frankfurt School == | |||
{{main|Frankfurt School}} | |||
]. Student protest movements drew on the scholars of the Frankfurt School, especially ]. The blackboard reads, "Study is Opium" and "Only fascists study today."]] | |||
Apart from any conspiratorial usage, the phrase 'cultural Marxism' has been occasionally used in accepted academic scholarship to mean the study of how the production of culture is used by elite groups to maintain their dominance.<ref name="survey"/><ref name="Hanlon"/><ref name="Lynn">{{cite journal |last=Lynn |first=Andrew |title=Cultural Marxism |journal=The Hedgehog Review |volume=20 |number=3}}</ref><ref name="LikeUs"/> Generally no one self-identifies as a 'cultural Marxist'.<ref name="LikeUs"/> 'Cultural Marxism' is sometimes treated as synonymous with the ']' that originated in the ];<ref name="survey"/><ref name="Hanlon"/> the name 'Critical Theory' was coined as a euphemism for Marxism.<ref name="JaySplintersIntro">{{Cite book |first=Martin |last=Jay |chapter=Introduction |title=Splinters in Your Eye Essays on the Frankfurt School. |date=2020 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-78873-603-9 |pages=151–172 |oclc=1163441655}} from {{cite book |title=Walter Benjamin: The Story of a Friendship |translator-last=Zohn |translator-first=Harry |publisher=Shocken Books |year=1981 |page=210}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title="The Essential Frankfurt School Reader |editor1-last=Arato |editor1-first=Andrew |editor2-last=Gebhardt |editor2-first=Eike |publisher=] |year=1985 |isbn=0-8264-0194-5 |page=205}}</ref> More generally, ], a broad trend of scholarship outside Russia that refocused Marxist thought from its original domain of economics towards culture, is also known as 'cultural Marxism'.<ref name="Buchanan">{{cite book |doi=10.1093/acref/9780199532919.001.0001 |last=Buchanan |first=Ian |title=A Dictionary of Critical Theory |year=2010 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0-19-953291-9}}</ref> | |||
A group of ]s including ], ], and ] founded the ] in Frankfurt around 1922 and 1923.<ref name="Abyss">{{cite book |last=Jeffries |first=Stuart |title=Grand Hotel Abyss: The Lives of the Frankfurt School |publisher=] |date=2017 |page=78 |isbn=9-781-78478-569-7}}</ref> Seeking to explain the failure of the ], they combined Marx's economic analyses with other lines of thought about psychology and culture, especially the ].<ref name="Abyss"/> Around 1929, ] began the school of thought that came to be known as the Frankfurt School or Critical Theory, which grew to encompass numerous contributors directly engaged with the Institute for Social Research and others outside it.<ref name="SEPCriticalTheory">{{Cite SEP |last=Bohman |first=James |last2=Flynn |first2=Jeffrey |last3=Celikates |first3=Robin |title=Critical Theory |url-id=critical-theory |edition=Winter 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Corradetti |first=Claudio |url=https://iep.utm.edu/frankfur/ |title=The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=October 24, 2020 |archive-date=October 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020004411/https://iep.utm.edu/frankfur/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first1=Laurent |last1=Stern |title=On the Frankfurt school |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(83)90043-8 |journal=] |date=January 1, 1983 |issn=0191-6599 |pages=83–90 |volume=4 |issue=1 |doi=10.1016/0191-6599(83)90043-8}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=The Frankfurt School |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315132105/frankfurt-school-horkheimer-max-adorno-theodor-torr-zolt%C3%A1n-landmann-michael |publisher=] |date=October 25, 2017 |location=New York |isbn=978-1-315-13210-5 |doi=10.4324/9781315132105 |last1=Adorno |first1=Theodor W. |author1-link=Theodor W. Adorno |last2=Torr |first2=Zoltán |last3=Landmann |first3=Michael |editor1-first=Max |editor1-last=Horkheimer |editor1-link=Max Horkheimer}}</ref> Recognizing the imminent danger of ], in 1935 Horkheimer relocated the institute to ] in New York.<ref name="Abyss"/> Thereafter, it became a driving force of the Frankfurt school to understand the rise of ] so that it could be prevented from repeating.<ref name="Abyss"/><ref name="Jeffries2021">{{cite news |last1=Jeffries |first1=Stuart |title=Why Theodor Adorno and the Frankfurt School failed to change the world |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2021/08/splinters-in-your-eye-frankfurt-school-review |access-date=October 4, 2021 |work=] |date=August 18, 2021}}</ref> In works including Horkheimer and ]'s book '']'' and ] '']'' they analyzed the ] in terms of Marxist labor theory and Freudian psychoanalysis. They were concerned about ]'s ability to instill ], and Adorno proposed the concept of an ] that rendered citizens in liberal democracies vulnerable to being swept up in fascist movements.<ref name="Abyss"/> | |||
After the war, Adorno and Horkheimer returned to Germany, and the Frankfurt School continued on in a second generation exemplified by ].<ref name="Abyss"/> Herbert Marcuse remained in America, where he became a controversial public figure associated with the ].<ref name="Abyss"/> Through his writing on ] and advising students such as ] and ], Marcuse played a dramatic role in the ] and ].<ref name="Abyss"/> In contrast, most members of the Frankfurt School avoided such involvement.<ref name="Abyss"/> After the New Left declined in the 1970s, ] — a concept with origins in the Frankfurt School — became a major current in American universities.<ref name="Gottesman">{{cite book |last=Gottesman |first=Isaac |title=The Critical Turn in Education |publisher=] |editor-last=Apple |editor-first=Michael |year=2016 |isbn=978-1-138-78134-4}}</ref> Critical pedagogy contributed to controversy about ] in the 1990s.<ref name="Graff">{{cite journal |last=Graff |first=Gerald |title=Teaching Politically Without Political Correctness |journal=The Radical Teacher |year=2000 |volume=Fall 2000 |number=58 |pages=26–30 |jstor=20710051 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/20710051}}</ref> | |||
=== Conspiratorial interpretations === | |||
Conspiracy theories claim that an elite of Marxist theorists and Frankfurt School intellectuals are subverting Western society. Although some theories make reference to actual thinkers and ideas selected from the Western Marxist tradition, they severely misrepresent the subject, and they give an exaggerated interpretation of their effective influence.<ref name="Jamin2018-conclusion">{{cite journal |last1=Jamin |first1=Jérôme |title=Cultural Marxism: A survey |journal=Religion Compass |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rec3.12258 |date=February 6, 2018 |volume=12 |issue=1–2 |pages=e12258 |doi=10.1111/REC3.12258 |quote=When looking at the literature on Cultural Marxism as a piece of cultural studies, as a conspiracy described by Lind and its followers, and as arguments used by Buchanan, Breivik, and other actors within their own agendas, we see a common ground made of unquestionable facts in terms of who did what and where, and for how long at the Frankfurt School. Nowhere do we see divergence of opinion about who Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse really were, when they have met and in which universities. But this changes if we look at descriptions of what they wanted to do: conducting research or changing deeply the culture of the West? Were they working for political science or were they engaging with a hidden political agenda? Were they working for the academic community or obeying foreign secret services?}}</ref><ref name="Tuters2018-control">{{cite journal |last1=Tuters |first1=M. |title=Cultural Marxism |journal=] |year=2018 |volume=2018 |issue=2 |pages=32–34 |hdl=11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |url=https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |quote=The concept of Cultural Marxism seeks to introduce readers unfamiliar with – and presumably completely uninterested in – Western Marxist thought to its key thinkers, as well as some of their ideas, as part of an insidious story of secret operations of mind-control ...}}</ref><ref name="Tuters2018-distort">{{cite journal |last1=Tuters |first1=M. |title=Cultural Marxism |journal=] |year=2018 |volume=2018 |issue=2 |pages=32–34 |hdl=11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |url=https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |language=en |quote=The Cultural Marxist narrative attributes incredible influence to the power of the ideas of the Frankfurt School to the extent that it may even be read as a kind of 'perverse tribute' to the latter (Jay 2011). In one account, for example (Estulin 2005), Theodor Adorno is thought to have helped pioneer new and insidious techniques for mind control that are now used by the 'mainstream media' to promote its 'liberal agenda' – this as part of Adorno's work, upon first emigrating to the United States, with Paul Lazarsfeld on the famous Princeton Radio Research Project, which helped popularize the contagion theory of media effects with its study of Orson Welles' 1938 broadcast of The War of the Worlds. In an ironical sense this literature can perhaps be understood as popularizing simplified or otherwise distorted versions of certain concepts initially developed by the Frankfurt School, as well as those of Western Marxism more generally.}}</ref><ref name="Woods 2019"/><ref name="LikeUs">{{cite journal |first1=Sven |last1=Lütticken |title=Cultural Marxists Like Us |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/700248 |journal=Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry |date=August 24, 2018 |issn=1465-4253 |pages=66–75 |volume=46 |doi=10.1086/700248 |s2cid=150160559}}</ref> None of the Frankfurt School's members were part of any kind of international conspiracy to destroy ].<ref name="Jay"/><ref name="Neiwert 2019">{{cite web |last=Neiwert |first=David |date=January 23, 2019 |title=How the 'cultural Marxism' hoax began, and why it's spreading into mainstream |url=https://www.dailykos.com/story/2019/1/23/1828527/-How-the-cultural-Marxism-hoax-began-and-why-it-s-spreading-into-the-mainstream |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120515/https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/23/1828527/-How-the-cultural-Marxism-hoax-began-and-why-it-s-spreading-into-the-mainstream |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |access-date=October 24, 2020 |website=]}}</ref> According to Marc Tuters, "the analysis of Marxism proffered by this literature would certainly not stand up to scrutiny by any serious historian of the subject."<ref name="Tuters2018">{{cite journal |last1=Tuters |first1=M. |title=Cultural Marxism |journal=] |year=2018 |volume=2018 |issue=2 |pages=32–34 |hdl=11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |url=https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e}}</ref> Conspiracy theorists misrepresent the nature of Theodor Adorno's work on the ], wherein Adorno sought to understand the ability of mass media to influence the public, which he saw as a danger to be mitigated, rather than a plan to be implemented.<ref name="Jay"/><ref name="Woods 2019"/> | |||
Some of the many ways the various versions of the conspiracy theory diverge from reality include: | |||
* Whether individuals associated with the Frankfurt School are responsible for particular acts at particular times, or whether they are responsible for trends across large spans of space and time<ref name="survey"/> | |||
* The goals of the Frankfurt School — whether it was to free the oppressed, or to destroy those institutions they criticized for having an oppressive quality<ref name="survey"/><ref name="Jay"/><ref name="Woods 2019"/> | |||
* How successful or unsuccessful the Frankfurt School was in achieving its goals<ref name="survey"/><ref name="Jay"/><ref name="Jeffries2021"/> | |||
Conspiracy theorists position themselves as defending "]",<ref name="survey"/><ref name="Woods 2019"/> which serves as a ] often focusing on ] and ].<ref name="Woods 2019"/> The conspiracy theory is an extreme assessment of political correctness, accusing the latter of being a project to destroy Christianity, ], and the ].<ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020"/> Scholars associated with the Frankfurt School sought to create a better society by warning against patriarchy<ref name="Hammond">{{cite journal |last=Hammond |first=Guy B. |title=Transformations of the Father Image |journal=Soundings |volume=61 |number=2 |pages=145–167 |publisher=] |year=1978}}</ref><ref name="GirouxFrankfurt">{{cite journal |last=Giroux |first=Henry |title=Culture and Rationality in Frankfurt School Thought |journal=Theory and Research in Social Education |volume=9 |number=4 |pages=17–55 |publisher=] |doi=10.1080/00933104.1982.10506119}}</ref><ref name="KellnerNewLeft">{{cite book |last=Kellner |first=Douglas |title=Herbert Marcuse: The New Left and the 1960s |publisher=] |year=2005 |isbn=9780815371670 |chapter=Introduction}}</ref> and capitalist exploitation, goals that could seem threatening to others who have an interest in maintaining the status quo.<ref name="survey"/> This has been disputed by some critics, who have suggested that the Frankfurt School's theory of historical development gives tacit support to patriarchy and imperialism.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1044778556 |title=The Routledge companion to the Frankfurt school |date=2019 |editor1-first=Peter Eli |editor1-last=Gordon |editor2-first=Espen |editor2-last=Hammer |editor3-first=Axel |editor3-last=Honneth |isbn=978-0-429-44337-4 |location=New York, NY |publisher=] |pages=xx |oclc=1044778556}}</ref> | |||
] tended to focus on economics and dismiss cultural matters as ], but this tendency was reversed in Western Marxism. The Frankfurt School critiqued the culture industry and its ability to undermine class consciousness, then later it began to examine the culture industry as a kind of base productive sector. This shift coincided with the rise of the New Left and a pivot from working classes to intellectuals as a revolutionary vanguard. According to Sven Lütticken, the narrative of a progressive ] resembles actual events, apart from the "extreme, borderline-magical" agency that the conspiracy theory attributes to a handfull of sociologists.<ref name="LikeUs"/> | |||
Conspiracy theorists exaggerate the real influence of Western Marxists. By contrast, Stuart Jeffries noted their "negligible real-world impact", while Jürgen Habermas criticized what he called their "strategy of hibernation", noting that Frankfurt School figures were mostly content to complain about the world rather than attempting to change it.<ref name="Jeffries2021"/> Jeffries wrote: "The Frankfurt conspiracy theory, which has captivated several alt-right figures including Trump, ] and the late ], founder of the eponymous news service, turned this history on its head. Rather than impotent professors issuing scarcely comprehensible ]s from the academy, the likes of Adorno, Horkheimer, ] and Herbert Marcuse were a crack cadre of subversives, who, during their American exile, performed a cultural takedown to which ']' is a belated riposte."<ref name="Jeffries2021"/> According to Joan Braune, Cultural Marxism in the sense referred to by the conspiracy theorists never existed, and does not correspond to any historical school of thought. She also states that Frankfurt School scholars are referred to as "Critical Theorists", not "Cultural Marxists". She points out that, contrary to the claims of the conspiracy theorists, ] tends to be wary of or even hostile towards Marxism, including towards the ] typically supported by Critical Theory.<ref name="Braune 2019">{{cite journal |last=Braune |first=Joan |date=2019 |title=Who's Afraid of the Frankfurt School? 'Cultural Marxism' as an Antisemitic Conspiracy Theory |url=http://transformativestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/Joan-Braune.pdf |journal=Journal of Social Justice |volume=9 |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=July 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200716023535/http://transformativestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/Joan-Braune.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In a 2019 addendum to ''Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment'', Martin Jay wrote that the conspiracy theory's enduring circulation calls for deeper analysis than simple ridicule.<ref name="Jay2019"/> He suggests a starting point for investigation to be the Frankfurt School's analysis of the authoritarian personality and the reception of this idea on the right. From the beginning in Minnicino's essay, the conspiracy theory has identified the authoritarian personality concept as an instrument for promulgating political correctness. By pathologizing political commitments as a form of mental illness, the authoritarian personality concept denies personal agency and the possibility of change. Fromm, Habermas, and ], among others, have raised cautionary notes about this tendency. The conspiracy theory however draws unfounded inferences from the Frankfurt School's various post-war government funding sources to vastly overstate Adorno's influence on government policy. Nonetheless, the authoritarian personality scale has been wielded rhetorically against populism and the alt-right since 2016. Jay concludes it is, "counterproductive to pathologize their politics too quickly and subsume them under theoretical categories that rob them of any critical self-reflectivity or ability to alter their views or behavior."<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
== Terrorism == | |||
{{anchor|Anders Behring Breivik}} | |||
], which he said were a defense against Cultural Marxism<ref name=":1" /><ref name="QANTARA" /><ref name=":0" />]] | |||
On July 22, 2011, Anders Breivik murdered 77 people in the ]. About 90 minutes before enacting the violence, Breivik e-mailed 1,003 people his manifesto ''2083: A European Declaration of Independence'' and a copy of ''Political Correctness: A Short History of an Ideology''.<ref name=":1">{{cite magazine |last1=Trilling |first1=Daniel |title=Who are Breivik's Fellow Travellers? |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2012/04/who-are-breivik%E2%80%99s-fellow-travellers |access-date=July 18, 2015 |magazine=] |date=April 18, 2012 |archive-date=July 22, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150722052250/http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2012/04/who-are-breivik%E2%80%99s-fellow-travellers |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="QANTARA">{{cite web |last1=Buruma |first1=Ian |title=Breivik's Call to Arms |url=http://en.qantara.de/content/islamophobia-in-europe-breiviks-call-to-arms |website=] |publisher=German Federal Agency for Civic Education & Deutsche Welle |date=August 11, 2011 |access-date=July 25, 2015 |archive-date=July 25, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150725115001/http://en.qantara.de/content/islamophobia-in-europe-breiviks-call-to-arms |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite news |title='Breivik Manifesto' Details Chilling Attack Preparation |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-14267007 |access-date=August 2, 2015 |work=] |date=July 24, 2011 |archive-date=September 24, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924164256/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-14267007 |url-status=live}}</ref> Cultural Marxism was the primary subject of Breivik's manifesto.<ref>{{cite book |editor1-last=KhosraviNik|editor1-first=Majid |editor2-last=Mral |editor2-first=Brigitte |editor3-last=Wodak |editor3-first=Ruth |title=Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse |date=2013 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |location=London |isbn=978-1-7809-3245-3 |pages=96, 97 |edition=reprint |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wrw8gC8vCnUC&pg=PA89 |access-date=July 30, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=van Gerven Oei |first=Vincent W. J. |date=September 22, 2011 |title=Anders Breivik: On Copying the Obscure |url=http://www.continentcontinent.cc/index.php/continent/article/view/56 |journal=Continent. |language=en |volume=1 |issue=3 |pages=213–223 |issn=2159-9920 |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=July 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200716125213/http://www.continentcontinent.cc/index.php/continent/article/view/56 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Breivik wrote that the "sexually transmitted disease (STD) epidemic in Western Europe is a result of cultural Marxism", that "Cultural Marxism defines Muslims, feminist women, homosexuals, and some additional minority groups, as virtuous, and they view ethnic Christian European men as evil" and that the "] (ECHR) in Strasbourg is a cultural-Marxist-controlled political entity."<ref name=":0"/><ref name="QANTARA"/><ref name="PINO">{{cite book |last1=Shanafelt |first1=Robert |last2=Pino |first2=Nathan W. |title=Rethinking Serial Murder, Spree Killing, and Atrocities: Beyond the Usual Distinctions |publisher=] |location=Abingdon, England |isbn=978-1-317-56467-6 |year=2014 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XDmLBQAAQBAJ&q=Rethinking+Serial+Murder,+Spree+Killing,+and+Atrocities:+Beyond+the+Usual+author&pg=PT10 |language=en |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=August 28, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828223938/https://books.google.com/books?id=XDmLBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT10&lpg=PT10&dq=Rethinking+Serial+Murder,+Spree+Killing,+and+Atrocities:+Beyond+the+Usual+author#v=snippet |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref> | |||
A number of other far-right terrorists have espoused the conspiracy theory. ], a ] ] convicted of plotting the assassination of Labour MP ], promoted the conspiracy theory in a video for the ].<ref>{{Cite news |date=June 12, 2018 |title=MP's murder was to be 'white jihad' |language=en-GB |work=] |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44452529 |access-date=September 24, 2020 |archive-date=June 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190601071728/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44452529 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=May 24, 2019 |title=The story of Jack Renshaw: The ex-Manchester student and paedophile who plotted a murder |url=https://thetab.com/uk/2019/05/24/the-story-of-jack-renshaw-the-ex-manchester-student-and-paedophile-who-plotted-a-murder-102505 |access-date=September 24, 2020 |website=] |language=en-GB |archive-date=June 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200612130506/https://thetab.com/uk/2019/05/24/the-story-of-jack-renshaw-the-ex-manchester-student-and-paedophile-who-plotted-a-murder-102505 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=June 15, 2018 |title=How did Jack Renshaw, star of the creepy BNP Youth video, end up attempting to murder an MP? |url=https://thetab.com/uk/2018/06/15/how-did-jack-renshaw-star-of-the-creepy-bnp-youth-video-end-up-attempting-to-murder-an-mp-68449 |access-date=September 24, 2020 |website=] |language=en-GB |archive-date=June 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200612175032/https://thetab.com/uk/2018/06/15/how-did-jack-renshaw-star-of-the-creepy-bnp-youth-video-end-up-attempting-to-murder-an-mp-68449 |url-status=live}}</ref> John T. Earnest, the perpetrator of the 2019 ], was inspired by ] ideology. In an online manifesto, Earnest stated that he believed "every Jew is responsible for the meticulously planned ]" through the promotion of "cultural Marxism and communism."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Lorber |first1=Ben |title=The Resurgence of Right-Wing Anti-Semitic Conspiracism Endangers All Justice Movements |url=https://rewirenewsgroup.com/religion-dispatches/2019/05/01/the-resurgence-of-right-wing-anti-semitic-conspiracism-endangers-all-justice-movements/ |website=Rewire News Group |date=May 1, 2019 |access-date=October 25, 2020 |archive-date=October 25, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201025144547/https://rewirenewsgroup.com/religion-dispatches/2019/05/01/the-resurgence-of-right-wing-anti-semitic-conspiracism-endangers-all-justice-movements/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== Reactions === | |||
Concerning the real-life political violence caused by the conspiracy theory, law professor ] wrote: "That 'cultural Marxism' is a crude ], referring to something that does not exist, unfortunately does not mean actual people are not being set up to pay the price, as ]s, to appease a rising sense of anger and anxiety. And for that reason, 'cultural Marxism' is not only a sad diversion from framing legitimate grievances but also a dangerous lure in an increasingly unhinged moment."<ref name="Moyn 2018">{{cite news |title=The Alt-Right's Favorite Meme is 100 Years Old |first=Samuel |last=Moyn |author-link=Samuel Moyn |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/opinion/cultural-marxism-anti-semitism.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion&action=click&contentCollection=opinion®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=sectionfront |newspaper=] |date=November 13, 2018 |access-date=November 4, 2018 |archive-date=November 14, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181114182205/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/opinion/cultural-marxism-anti-semitism.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion&action=click&contentCollection=opinion®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=sectionfront |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== Antisemitism == | |||
The author Matthew Rose wrote that arguments by the American neo-Nazi ] after World War II were an early example of the conspiracy theory.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Rose |first1=Matthew |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NSA3EAAAQBAJ |title=A World after Liberalism: Philosophers of the Radical Right |publisher=] |year=2021 |isbn=9780300263084 |name-list-style=and |page=78 |via=]}}</ref> | |||
] views the ]. The Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory is often compared to the antisemitic Nazi propaganda about "]" and "]".]] | |||
William Lind on one occasion presented his theories at a ] conference.<ref name="Berkowitz"/> | |||
According to Samuel Moyn, "he wider discourse around cultural Marxism today resembles nothing so much as a version of the ] myth updated for a new age." Maxime Dafaure likewise states that ''Cultural Marxism'' is a contemporary update of antisemitic conspiracy theories, such as the Nazi concept of "Cultural Bolshevism", and is directly associated with the concept of "Jewish Bolshevism".<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Maxime |last1=Dafaure |title=The 'Great Meme War:' the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies |url=http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369 |journal=Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World |date=April 1, 2020 |issn=2274-2042 |issue=10 |doi=10.4000/angles.369 |access-date=November 4, 2020 |archive-date=September 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200927071602/https://journals.openedition.org/angles/369 |url-status=live |doi-access=free |quote=The Cultural Marxism narrative has particularly telling ancestors, since it is a mere contemporary update of Nazi Germany’s concept of “Cultural Bolshevism” used to foster anti-Soviet fears (not unlike the American anti-communist hysterias of the Red Scares). Maybe even more telling is its direct association with the like-minded “Jewish Bolshevism” concept, which professes the whimsical claim that a Jewish cabal is responsible for the creation and spread of communism, and more broadly for the “degeneracy” of traditional Western values, an infamous term which also surfaces in recent far-right arguments.}}</ref> According to philosopher ], the term ''Cultural Marxism'' "plays the same structural role as that of the 'Jewish plot' in anti-Semitism: it projects (or rather, transposes) the immanent antagonism of our socio-economic life onto an external cause: what the conservative alt-right deplores as the ethical disintegration of our lives (], attacks on ], ], etc.) must have an external cause—because it cannot, for them, emerge out of the antagonisms and tensions of our own societies."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Burgis |first1=Ben |last2=Hamilton |first2=Conrad Bongard |last3=McManus |first3=Matthew |last4=Trejo |first4=Marion |date=2020 |title=Myth and Mayhem: A Leftist Critique of Jordan Peterson |publisher=] |location=London, England |page=16 |isbn=978-1-7890-4554-3}}</ref> ] wrote a conservative critique of conservatives' complaints about Cultural Marxism in '']'', stating: "For the Nazis, the Frankfurter School and its vaguely Jewish exponents fell under the rubric of {{lang|de|Kulturbolshewismus}}, 'Cultural Bolshevism.'"<ref name="Paul 2019"/> | |||
Andrew Woods in the essay "Cultural Marxism and the Cathedral: Two Alt-Right Perspectives on Critical Theory" (2019), acknowledges comparisons to Cultural Bolshevism, but argues against the idea the modern conspiracy theory was derived from Nazi propaganda. He writes instead that its antisemitism is "profoundly American".<ref name="Woods 2019">{{cite book |last1=Woods |first1=Andrew |title=Critical Theory and the Humanities in the Age of the Alt-Right |publisher=] |location=New York City |isbn=978-3-030-18753-8 |pages=39–59 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_3 |chapter=Cultural Marxism and the Cathedral: Two Alt-Right Perspectives on Critical Theory |date=2019 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_3 |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=October 30, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201030141727/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_3 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{rp|47}} In ''Commune'' magazine, Woods detailed a genealogy of the conspiracy theory beginning with the LaRouche movement.<ref name=WoodsCommune>{{cite web |url=https://communemag.com/the-american-roots-of-a-right-wing-conspiracy/ |last=Woods |first=Andrew |title=The American Roots of a Right-wing Conspiracy |work=Commune |date=March 20, 2019 |volume=Winter 2020 |issue=5}}</ref> | |||
] has written several anti-semitic texts centering on the Frankfurt School. MacDonald criticized Breivik's manifesto for not being more hostile to Jews.<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
=== Circulation in the alt-right === | |||
] and ] promoted the conspiracy theory and help expand its reach. Websites such as the '']'' have run articles with titles like "Cultural Marxism in Action: Media Matters Engineers Cancellation of Vdare.com Conference".<ref name="Media"/> '']'' regularly runs stories about "Cultural Marxism" with titles such as "Jewish Cultural Marxism is Destroying Abercrombie & Fitch", "Hollywood Strikes Again: Cultural Marxism through the Medium of Big Box-Office Movies" and "The Left-Center-Right Political Spectrum of Immigration = Cultural Marxism".<ref>{{cite journal |last=Mirrlees |first=Tanner |year=2018 |url=https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403/pdf_55 |title=The Alt-Right's Discourse of 'Cultural Marxism': A Political Instrument of Intersectional Hate |journal=Atlantis |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=49–69 |access-date=November 2, 2020 |quote=A glut of content about cultural Marxism now circulates through the Internet and World Wide Web, and much of it stems from alt-right media sources—websites, magazines, and blogs. Anglin's ''The Daily Stormer'' publishes stories like 'Jewish Cultural Marxism is Destroying Abercrombie & Fitch' (Farben 2017) and 'Hollywood Strikes Again: Cultural Marxism through the Medium of Big Box-Office Movies' (Murray 2016) and 'The Left-Center-Right Political Spectrum of Immigration = Cultural Marxism' (Duchesne 2015). |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120538/https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403/pdf_55 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Neo-nazis associated with ] have strategically used the Frankfurt School as a euphemism to refer to Jewish people more generally, in venues where more forthright anti-semitism would be censored or rejected.<ref name=Jay/> | |||
Timothy Matthews criticized the Frankfurt School from an explicitly ] perspective in the ] weekly newspaper '']''. According to Matthews, the Frankfurt School, under the influence of ], seeks to destroy the traditional Christian family using critical theory and Marcuse's concept of polymorphous perversity, thereby encouraging homosexuality and breaking down the patriarchal family.<ref name="Woods 2019"/> Andrew Woods wrote that the plot Matthews describes does not resemble the Frankfurt School so much as the alleged aims of communists in '']'' by ].<ref name="Woods 2019"/><ref group=note>The article accused the Frankfurt School of having eleven primary aims: | |||
#The creation of ] offences | |||
#Continual change to create confusion | |||
#The teaching of sex and ] to children | |||
#The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority | |||
#Huge ] to destroy identity | |||
#The promotion of ] | |||
#Emptying of churches | |||
#An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime | |||
#Dependency on the state or state benefits | |||
#Control and dumbing down of media | |||
#Encouraging the breakdown of the family</ref> | |||
Nonetheless, Matthews' account was circulated credulously by ] and ] news media as well as in ] internet forums such including Stormfront.<ref name="Woods 2019"/><ref name="Jay"/> | |||
Following the Norway attacks, the conspiracy theory was taken up by a number of ] outlets and forums, including ] websites such as ], '']'' and ] which have promoted the theory. The AltRight Corporation's website, altright.com, featured articles with titles such as "Ghostbusters and the Suicide of Cultural Marxism", "#3 — Sweden: The World Capital of Cultural Marxism" and "Beta Leftists, Cultural Marxism and Self-Entitlement".<ref name="Media">{{cite journal |last=Mirrlees |first=Tanner |year=2018 |url=https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403/pdf_55 |title=The Alt-Right's Discourse of 'Cultural Marxism': A Political Instrument of Intersectional Hate |journal=Atlantis |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=49–69 |access-date=November 2, 2020 |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120515/https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403/pdf_55 |url-status=live}}</ref> ''InfoWars'' ran numerous headlines such as "Is Cultural Marxism America's New Mainline Ideology?"<ref name="Braune 2019"/> VDARE ran similar articles with similar titles such as "Yes, Virginia (Dare) There Is A Cultural Marxism—And It's Taking Over Conservatism Inc."<ref name="Media"/> | |||
], head of the ], has promoted the conspiracy theory.<ref name="Media"/> Spencer's ] was on the topic of Theodor Adorno.<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
=== Jewish supporters === | |||
], a prominent Jewish ]]] | |||
There are some notable Jewish supporters of the conspiracy theory.<ref name="Jay2019"/> ] was at one time a student of Herbert Marcuse (with whom he disagreed) and edited ''].''<ref name="Jay2019"/><ref name="Braune 2019"/> Under Gottfried's tenure, ''Telos'' became far-right in its outlook, writing favorably about ] and ].<ref name="Braune 2019"/><ref name="Jay2019"/> Gottfried influenced Richard Spencer and has been called the "]" of the alt-right.<ref name="Jay2019"/><ref name="Braune 2019"/> He defended William Lind against accusations that "Cultural Marxism" has anti-semitic undertones.<ref name="Jay2019"/> Gottfried identifies as ] and questions the value of ].<ref name="Braune 2019"/> Gottfried defines cultural Marxism as "a particular movement for change that combines some elements of Marxist socialism with a call for sexual and cultural revolution". However, he says that the term "cultural Marxism" is not ideal since the connection with Marxism is tenuous.<ref name="GottfriedAntifascism">{{cite book |last=Gottfried |first=Paul |title=Antifascism: The Course of a Crusade |publisher=] |year=2021 |isbn=9781501759352}}</ref> Gottfried writes that the influence of the Frankfurt School lives on in modern left-wing politics mainly in the form of a tendency to conflate the right wing with fascism.<ref name="GottfriedAntifascism"/> | |||
Other Jewish supporters include ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
Jewish supporters of the conspiracy theory are generally more ] (a term coined by Gottfried<ref name="Braune 2019"/>) than ].<ref name="Jay2019"/> Martin Jay calls the number of Jewish proponents of the conspiracy theory "puzzling and uncomfortable."<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
== Entering the mainstream == | |||
Rachel Busbridge, Benjamin Moffitt and Joshua Thorburn describe the conspiracy theory as being promoted by the far-right, but that it "has gained ground over the past quarter century" and conclude that "hrough the lens of the Cultural Marxist conspiracy, however, it is possible to discern a relationship of empowerment between mainstream and fringe, whereby certain talking points and tropes are able to be transmitted, taken up and adapted by 'mainstream' figures, thus giving credence and visibility to ideologies that would have previously been constrained to the margins."<ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020"/> | |||
], founder of ], authored a 2011 book ''Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World'' that represents one of the conspiracy theory's moves towards the mainstream.<ref name="Woods 2019"/><ref name="Jay2019"/> Breitbart's interpretation of the conspiracy is similar in most respects to that of Lind. Breitbart attributes the spread of the ideas of the Frankfurt School from universities to a wider audience to "trickledown intellectualism", and claims that ] introduced cultural Marxism to the masses in his 1971 handbook '']''. Woods argues that Breitbart focuses on Alinsky in order to associate cultural Marxism with the modern ], and ].<ref name="Woods 2019"/> Breitbart claims that ] funds the alleged cultural Marxism project.<ref name="Woods 2019"/> Martin Jay wrote that Breitbart's book displayed "appalling ignorance" of the actual work of the Frankfurt School.<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
Breitbart News has published the idea that ]'s ] music was an attempt at inducing the population to ] on a mass scale.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Brown |first=Mark |date=January 2019 |title=In defence of degenerate art |url=http://socialistreview.org.uk/442/defence-degenerate-art |magazine=] |issue=442 |access-date=November 22, 2020 |quote=In 2015, Gerald Warner (the 'Tory intellectual' Scottish journalist) wrote an article for the American alt-right house journal Breitbart attacking the Frankfurt School of left-wing cultural theorists. His piece included this little gem: 'Theodor Adorno promoted degenerate atonal music to induce mental illness, including necrophilia, on a large scale.' |archive-date=August 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200820022802/http://socialistreview.org.uk/442/defence-degenerate-art |url-status=live}}</ref> Former ] contributors ] and ], founder of ], have promoted the conspiracy theory, especially the claim that Cultural Marxist activity is happening in universities.<ref name="Braune 2019"/><ref>{{cite magazine |last=McManus |first=Matt |date=May 18, 2018 |url=https://merionwest.com/2018/05/18/on-marxism-post-modernism-and-cultural-marxism/ |title=On Marxism, Post-Modernism, and 'Cultural Marxism' |magazine=Merion West |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200617192743/https://merionwest.com/2018/05/18/on-marxism-post-modernism-and-cultural-marxism/ |archive-date=June 17, 2020 |access-date=October 2, 2020}}</ref><ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020"/><ref name="Mirrlees 2018"/> | |||
In the late 2010s, Canadian clinical psychologist ] popularized "Cultural Marxism" as a term, moving it into mainstream discourse.<ref name="Sharpe 2020"/><ref name="Media"/><ref name="Berlatsky">{{cite web |first1=Noah |last1=Berlatsky |access-date=November 4, 2020 |title=How Anti-Leftism Has Made Jordan Peterson a Mark for Fascist Propaganda |url=https://psmag.com/education/jordan-peterson-sliding-toward-fascism |website=Pacific Standard |archive-date=June 13, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180613085727/https://psmag.com/education/jordan-peterson-sliding-toward-fascism |url-status=live}}</ref> Several writers stated that Peterson blamed "Cultural Marxism" for demanding the use of ] as a threat to free speech,<ref name="Sharpe 2020">{{cite web |last=Sharpe |first=Matthew |url=https://theconversation.com/is-cultural-marxism-really-taking-over-universities-i-crunched-some-numbers-to-find-out-139654 |title=Is 'cultural Marxism' Really Taking Over Universities? I Crunched Some Numbers to Find Out |website=The Conversation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201006190450/https://theconversation.com/is-cultural-marxism-really-taking-over-universities-i-crunched-some-numbers-to-find-out-139654 |archive-date=October 6, 2020 |url-status=live |access-date=October 6, 2020}}</ref> often misusing '']'' as a stand-in term for the conspiracy without understanding its ] implications, specifying that "Peterson isn't an ideological anti-Semite; there's every reason to believe that when he re-broadcasts fascist propaganda, he doesn't even hear the dog-whistles he's emitting".<ref name="Berlatsky"/><ref>{{cite book |last=Burston |first=Daniel |year=2020 |chapter=Jordan Peterson and the Postmodern University |title=Psychoanalysis, Politics and the Postmodern University |series=Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice |location=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |pages=129–156 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-34921-9_7 |isbn=978-3-030-34921-9 |s2cid=214014811 |via=Springer Link}}</ref> | |||
In 2015, after the '']'' trailer release, one of the initial Twitter accounts that spread accusations that the film was "anti-white" (because its lead characters were not white men) had the tagline "End Cultural Marxism" and promoted the conspiracy theory.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Davis |first=Ben |date=October 27, 2015 |title=The Star Wars Boycott, the Frankfurt School, and Cultural Marxism |url=https://news.artnet.com/opinion/cultural-marxism-boycott-star-wars-348914 |access-date=February 19, 2023 |website=Artnet News |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Koski |first=Genevieve |date=October 19, 2015 |title=How 2 racist trolls got a ridiculous Star Wars boycott trending on Twitter |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/10/19/9571309/star-wars-boycott |access-date=February 19, 2023 |website=] |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=McMillan |first=Graeme |date=October 19, 2015 |title="Boycott 'Star Wars VII'" Movement Launched; Movie Called "Anti-White" |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/boycott-star-wars-vii-movement-833102/ |access-date=February 19, 2023 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
In June 2018, ] posted a tweet containing a racist cartoon and a caption which mentioned Cultural Marxism. The tweet read "Are you stunned by what has become of American culture? Well, it's not an accident. You've probably heard of 'Cultural Marxism,’ but do you know what it means?". The tweet was later deleted with an apology, stating that a staff member had inadvertently posted what Paul described as an "offensive cartoon".<ref>{{Cite news |title=Ron Paul Tweets Racist Cartoon, Blames Staffer In Latest Deflection Of Bigoted Remarks Attributed To Libertarian Hero |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/ron-paul-racist-tweet-newsletter-anti-semitic/ |access-date=February 19, 2023 |work=] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Moyn |first=Samuel |date=November 13, 2018 |title=Opinion {{!}} The Alt-Right's Favorite Meme Is 100 Years Old |language=en-US |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/opinion/cultural-marxism-anti-semitism.html |access-date=February 19, 2023 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Mathis-Lilley |first=Ben |date=July 2, 2018 |title=Ron Paul Becomes Latest Republican to Post Literal Nazi Content |language=en-US |work=] |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/07/ron-paul-racist-caricature-tweet-republican-pattern.html |access-date=February 19, 2023 |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=July 2, 2018 |title=Ron Paul tweets, then deletes racist cartoon |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ron-paul-racism-republican-party-racist-tweet-cultural-marxism-libertarian-a8427781.html |access-date=February 19, 2023 |work=] |language=en}}</ref> | |||
In a 2020 ] opinion column, ] equated Cultural Marxism with what ] calls the ].<ref name="Douthat2020">{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/nyt-tom-cotton-oped-liberalism.html |last=Douthat |first=Ross |title=Ross Douthat: The Tom Cotton Op-Ed and the Cultural Revolution |work=] |date=June 12, 2020}}</ref> | |||
=== Concerns for false balance === | |||
Spencer Sunshine, an associate fellow at the ], stated that "the focus on the Frankfurt School by the right serves to highlight its inherent Jewishness."<ref name="Paul 2019">{{cite web |last=Paul |first=Ari |date=June 4, 2019 |title='Cultural Marxism': The Mainstreaming of a Nazi Trope |url=https://fair.org/home/cultural-marxism-the-mainstreaming-of-a-nazi-trope/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022045211/https://fair.org/home/cultural-marxism-the-mainstreaming-of-a-nazi-trope/ |archive-date=October 22, 2020 |access-date=October 24, 2020 |publisher=Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting}}</ref> In particular, Paul and Sunshine have criticized traditional media such as ''The New York Times'', '']'' and '']'' for their coverage of the conspiracy theory, arguing that they have either not clarified the nature of the conspiracy theory or "allow it to live on their pages."<ref name="Paul 2019"/> An example is an article in ''The New York Times'' by ], who Paul and Sunshine argue "rebrands cultural Marxism as mere political correctness, giving the Nazi-inspired phrase legitimacy for the American right. It is dropped in or quoted in other stories—some of them lighthearted, like the fashion cues of the alt-right—without describing how fringe this notion is. It's akin to letting conspiracy theories about ] or ] get unearned space in mainstream press."<ref name="Paul 2019"/> Another is ], who went on "to denounce 'cultural Marxists' for inspiring ] movements on campuses."<ref name="Paul 2019"/> Paul and Sunshine argued that failure to highlight the nature of the conspiracy theory "has bitter consequences. 'It is legitimizing the use of that framework, and therefore it's coded antisemitism.'"<ref name="Paul 2019"/> | |||
Sociologists Julia Lux and John David Jordan assert that the conspiracy theory can be broken down into its key elements: "] anti-feminism, neo-] science (broadly defined as various forms of ]), genetic and cultural ], ] anti-Leftism fixated on ], radical ] applied to the social sciences, and the idea that a purge is required to restore normality." They go on to say that all of these items are "supported, proselytised and academically buoyed by intellectuals, politicians, and media figures with extremely credible educational backgrounds."<ref>{{cite book |first1=Julia |last1=Lux |last2=Jordan |first2=John David |editor1-first=Elke |editor1-last=Heins |editor2-first=James |editor2-last=Rees |date=July 22, 2019 |title=Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy |publisher=] |chapter=7. Alt-Right 'cultural purity', ideology and mainstream social policy discourse: towards a political anthropology of 'mainstremeist' ideology |issue=31 |pages=151–176 |location=Bristol |language=en |doi=10.1332/policypress/9781447343981.001.0001 |isbn=9781447343981 |s2cid=213019061 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GRGjDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA151 |access-date=March 29, 2021 |via=]}}</ref> | |||
== Political discourses == | |||
In "Taking On Hate: One NGO's Strategies" (2009), the political scientist Heidi Beirich said that the Cultural Marxism theory ] the cultural '']'' of ] such as ], ], ], ], ], ]s, ] and ].<ref name="PERRY">{{cite book |editor1-last=Perry |editor1-first=Barbara |last1=Beirich |first1=Heidi |title=Hate crimes |date=2009 |publisher=Praeger Publishers |location=Westport, Connecticut |isbn=978-0-275-99569-0 |pages=119 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M7p6TDR1zwcC&pg=PA109 |access-date=November 30, 2015 |archive-date=August 28, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200828115957/https://books.google.com/books?id=M7p6TDR1zwcC&pg=PA109 |url-status=live |via=]}}</ref> | |||
Jamin writes on the flexibility of the conspiracy theory to serve the rhetorical purposes of different groups with diverse sets of enemies: | |||
{{Blockquote|Next to the global dimension of the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, there is its innovative and original dimension, which lets its authors avoid racist discourses and pretend to be defenders of democracy. As such, Cultural Marxism is innovative in comparison with old styled theories of a similar nature, such as those involving ]s, Bavarian ], ] or even ] bankers. For Lind, Buchanan and Breivik, the threat does not come from the migrant or the Jew because he is a migrant or a Jew. For Lind, the threat comes from the ] ideology, which is considered as a danger for freedom and democracy, and which is associated with different authoritarian political regimes (Russia, China, Cambodia, Cuba, etc.). For Buchanan, the threat comes from ], ] and hard capitalism which, when combined, transform people and nations into an uncontrolled mass of alienated consumers. For Breivik, a self-indoctrinated lone-wolf, the danger comes from Islam, a religion seen as a totalitarian ideology which threatens liberal democracies from Western Europe as much as its Judeo-Christian heritage. In Lind, Buchanan and Breivik, overt racism is studiously avoided.<ref name="Jamin"/>}} | |||
In "Liberalism and Socialism Mortal Enemies Or Embittered Kin?" (2021), professor Aaron Hanlon said that "the objectives of proponents of conspiratorial views about Cultural Marxism were (and are) not to give a current account of Critical Theory, but to advance a conservative version of US liberalism against the scapegoat of global conspiracy theory." and "In short, what Critical Theory provides to those who use 'critical theory' to signal a socialist threat to liberalism is not only a link to Marxist thought, but also a ] against which to advance ] politics."<ref name="Hanlon">{{Cite book |editor-last=McManus |editor-first=Matthew |last=Hanlon |first=Aaron |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6WxAEAAAQBAJ |title=Liberalism and Socialism: Mortal Enemies or Embittered Kin? |date=August 31, 2021 |publisher=] |isbn=978-3-030-79537-5 |language=en |chapter=Disambiguating Critical Theory |via=]}}</ref> | |||
=== Australia === | |||
Shortly after the Norway attacks, mainstream right-wing politicians began espousing the conspiracy. In 2013, ], a member of the ruling ], wrote in his book ''The Conservative Revolution'' that "cultural Marxism has been one of the most corrosive influences on society over the last century."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Busbridge |first1=Rachel |last2=Moffitt |first2=Benjamin |last3=Thorburn |first3=Joshua |title=Cultural Marxism: far-right conspiracy theory in Australia's culture wars |journal=Social Identities |date=June 29, 2020 |volume=26 |issue=6 |pages=722–738 |doi=10.1080/13504630.2020.1787822 |s2cid=225713131 |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2020.1787822 |access-date=October 10, 2020 |archive-date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201120516/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504630.2020.1787822 |url-status=live}}</ref> Five years later, ], former Australian Senator, initially sitting as a member of ] and then ], declared during his ] in 2018 that "Cultural Marxism is not a throwaway line but a literal truth" and spoke of the need for a "] to the immigration problem."<ref name="Busbridge, Moffitt & Thorburn 2020"/> | |||
=== Brazil === | |||
In Brazil, the government of ] contained a number of administration members who promoted the conspiracy theory, including ], the president's son who "enthusiastically described ] as an opponent of Cultural Marxism."<ref name="Braune 2019"/> Jair Bolsonaro sought to expunge the influence of ] from Brazilian universities. This had the ], driving sales of Freire's book '']''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://daily.jstor.org/paulo-freires-pedagogy-of-the-oppressed-at-fifty/ |last=Featherstone |first=Liza |title=Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed at Fifty |work=JSTOR Daily |date=September 30, 2020}}</ref> | |||
=== Cuba === | |||
In 2010, former head of state ] called attention to a version of the conspiracy theory by ], which proposed that the ] sought to influence world events via the spread of ] music.<ref name="Jay"/> Estulin's work was based on Minnicino's 1992 essay which emphasized Adorno's involvement in the ]. Martin Jay described Estulin's text as "risible" and explained that, although some in the Frankfurt School wrote about the potential for mass media to pacify labor movements, it was something they lamented rather than planned to implement.<ref name="Jay"/> Castro invited Estulin to Cuba, where they issued a joint statement claiming ] was a CIA asset and that the United States was planning a nuclear war against Russia. In 2019, Jay wrote that Castro's interest in the conspiracy theory had no long-term consequences.<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
=== Hungary === | |||
Hungarian prime minister ] has invoked a cultural Marxism ] in justifying certain illiberal policies and authoritarian centralization of power.<ref name="Paternotte2021">{{cite journal|last1=Paternotte|first1=David|last2=Verloo|first2=Mieke|title=De-democratization and the Politics of Knowledge: Unpacking the Cultural Marxism Narrative|journal=Social Politics|publisher=Oxford University Press|date=November 2021|volume=28|issue=3|pages=556–578 |doi=10.1093/sp/jxab025}}</ref> Orbán, who wrote a master's thesis on Antonio Gramsci, references Gramscian cultural hegemony as an impetus to contest left-aligned epistemic institutions, including universities and the media. In alignment with the cultural Marxism frame, Hungarian minister Bence Rétvári said that gender studies should be regarded as ideology rather than science. The Hungarian government withdrew state recognition of gender studies degree programs in 2018.<ref name="Paternotte2021"/> | |||
=== United Kingdom === | |||
During the ] debate in 2019, a number of ] and ]s were criticized for using the phrase "cultural Marxism" due to its conspiracy theory connotations.<ref name="Manavis 2019"/><ref name="Walker 2020"/> | |||
], a British ], ignited controversy by using the term "Cultural Marxism".]] | |||
], the Conservative ] (MP), said in a pro-Brexit speech for the ], a ] think tank, that "e are engaging in many battles right now. As Conservatives, we are engaged in a battle against cultural Marxism, where banning things is becoming ''de rigueur'', where freedom of speech is becoming a taboo, where our universities — quintessential institutions of ] — are being shrouded in censorship and a culture of no-platforming." Her usage of the conspiracy theory was condemned as ] by other MPs, the ] and the anti-racist organization ]. After meeting with her later, the Board of Deputies of British Jews said that she is "not in any way antisemitic." Braverman was alerted to this connection by journalist ], but she defended using the term.<ref>{{cite news |title=Tory MP Suella Braverman 'not in any way antisemitic', says Board after 'productive meeting' |date=April 3, 2019 |url=https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/tory-mp-suella-braverma-not-in-any-way-antisemitic-says-board-after-productive-meeting-1.482524 |newspaper=] |access-date=November 8, 2020 |archive-date=November 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124142714/https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/tory-mp-suella-braverma-not-in-any-way-antisemitic-says-board-after-productive-meeting-1.482524 |url-status=live}}</ref> Braverman denied that the term ''Cultural Marxism'' is an antisemitic trope,<ref name="Manavis 2019">{{cite news |last=Manavis |first=Sarah |date=March 26, 2019 |title=What is cultural Marxism? The alt-right meme in Suella Braverman's speech in Westminster |newspaper=] |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2019/03/what-cultural-marxism-alt-right-meme-suella-bravermans-speech-westminster |url-status=live |access-date=November 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124142652/https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2019/03/what-cultural-marxism-alt-right-meme-suella-bravermans-speech-westminster |archive-date=November 24, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Bowcott |first=Owen |date=February 13, 2020 |title=New attorney general wants to 'take back control' from courts |work=] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/13/new-attorney-general-wanted-to-take-back-control-from-courts |access-date=September 12, 2020 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=September 8, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200908074714/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/13/new-attorney-general-wanted-to-take-back-control-from-courts |url-status=live}}</ref> stating during a question and answer session "whether she stood by the term, given its far-right connections. She said: 'Yes, I do believe we are in a battle against cultural Marxism, as I said. We have culture evolving from the far left which has allowed the snuffing out of freedom of speech, freedom of thought.'" Braverman further added that she was "very aware of that ongoing creep of cultural Marxism, which has come from ]."<ref>{{cite news |last=Walker |first=Peter |date=March 26, 2019 |title=Tory MP criticised for using antisemitic term 'cultural Marxism' |work=] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/mar/26/tory-mp-criticised-for-using-antisemitic-term-cultural-marxism |access-date=September 12, 2020 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=September 13, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200913100721/https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/mar/26/tory-mp-criticised-for-using-antisemitic-term-cultural-marxism |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Sugarman |first=Daniel |date=March 26, 2019 |url=https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/board-of-deputies-rebuke-conservative-mp-suella-braverman-for-using-antisemitic-trope-1.482150 |access-date=September 12, 2020 |newspaper=] |title=Board of Deputies rebuke Conservative MP Suella Braverman for using 'antisemitic trope' |archive-date=September 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200904232420/https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/board-of-deputies-rebuke-conservative-mp-suella-braverman-for-using-antisemitic-trope-1.482150 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] has promoted the cultural Marxist conspiracy theory, for which he has been condemned by Jewish groups such as the Board of Deputies of British Jews as well as a number of Members of Parliament who said he used it as a ] code for ]. Farage said that the United Kingdom faced "cultural Marxism", a term described in its report by '']'' as "originating in a conspiracy theory based on a supposed plot against national governments, which is closely linked to the far right and antisemitism." Farage's spokesman "condemned previous criticism of his language by Jewish groups and others as 'pathetic' and 'a manufactured story.'"<ref name="Walker 2020">{{cite news |last=Walker |first=Peter |date=June 28, 2020 |title=Jewish groups and MPs condemn Nigel Farage over antisemitic 'dog whistles' |work=] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/28/jewish-groups-and-mps-condemn-nigel-farage-for-antisemitic-dog-whistles |access-date=September 11, 2020 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=September 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200904140432/https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/28/jewish-groups-and-mps-condemn-nigel-farage-for-antisemitic-dog-whistles |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In ''The War Against the BBC'' (2020), ] and ] write how the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory has been pushed by some on the right as part of an alleged ]. ] cites ], ] and the right-wing website '']'' as examples of "relentlessly about the institution's 'cultural Marxism' or left-wing bias. This now happens on a near-daily basis."<ref>{{cite news |last=Alibhai-Brown |first=Yasmin |date=October 20, 2020 |url=https://inews.co.uk/opinion/bbc-threat-licence-fee-dominic-cummings-732259 |title=Our BBC is under existential threat from right-wing, Trumpian tactics |newspaper=] |access-date=November 7, 2020 |archive-date=November 2, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201102051815/https://inews.co.uk/opinion/bbc-threat-licence-fee-dominic-cummings-732259 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In November 2020 a letter signed by 28 ] ] published in '']'' accused the ] of being "coloured by cultural Marxist dogma, colloquially known as the '] agenda'".<ref>{{cite letter |author=Sir John Hays MP |display-authors=etal |recipient=the ''Daily Telegraph'' |subject=Britain's heroes |language=English |date=November 9, 2020 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2020/11/09/letterswill-police-break-armistice-day-ceremonies-wednesday/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220112/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2020/11/09/letterswill-police-break-armistice-day-ceremonies-wednesday/ |archive-date=January 12, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=January 30, 2021 |author-mask= }}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.edwardleigh.org.uk/news/letter-telegraph |title=Letter to the Telegraph |last=Leigh |first=Edward |author-link=Edward Leigh |date=November 11, 2020 |website=Sir Edward Leigh MP |access-date=June 10, 2020 |quote=Part of our mission is to ensure that institutional custodians of history and heritage, tasked with safeguarding and celebrating British values, are not coloured by cultural Marxist dogma, colloquially known as the "woke agenda".}}</ref> The use of this terminology in the letter was described by the ], ], anti-racist charity ] and the ] as antisemitic.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/tory-mps-and-peers-warned-over-use-of-the-term-cultural-marxism-1.508974 |title=Tory MPs and peers warned over use of the term 'cultural Marxism' |first=Lee |last=Harpin |date=November 24, 2020 |work=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124163050/https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/tory-mps-and-peers-warned-over-use-of-the-term-cultural-marxism-1.508974 |archive-date=November 24, 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Childs 2020">{{cite web |last=Childs |first=Simon |title=28 Tories Wrote About an Anti-Semitic Trope and No One Seemed to Notice |website=VICE |date=November 13, 2020 |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkdpby/tories-telegraph-cultural-marxism-letter |access-date=May 4, 2021}}</ref><ref name="Left Foot Forward 2020">{{cite web |title=EXCLUSIVE: Leading Tories challenged for using phrase linked to 'anti-Semitic dog-whistle' |website=Left Foot Forward |date=November 11, 2020 |url=https://leftfootforward.org/2020/11/why-are-leading-tories-using-a-phrase-linked-to-an-anti-semitic-dog-whistle/ | access-date=May 4, 2021}}</ref> | |||
=== United States === | |||
Cultural Marxism discourse was found in several strands of U.S. right-wing politics post-2000, including the religious right and the ].<ref name="Collectivists">{{cite journal |url=http://crs.sagepub.com/content/38/4/565.abstract |title=Collectivists, Communists, Labor Bosses, and Treason: The Tea Parties as Right-wing Populist Counter-Subversion Panic |first1=Chip |last1=Berlet |author1-link=Chip Berlet |journal=] |publisher=] |location=Thousand Oaks, California |date=July 2012 |volume=38 |pages=565–587 |doi=10.1177/0896920511434750 |issue=4 |s2cid=144238367 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151115213944/http://crs.sagepub.com/content/38/4/565.abstract |archive-date=November 15, 2015}}</ref> | |||
Shortly after the ], Alex Ross wrote an article in '']'' titled, "The Frankfurt School Knew Trump was Coming". It argued that Trump represented the kind of authoritarian identified by Theodor Adorno's ]. This idea prompted academic conferences on the same theme at the ] and the ].<ref name="Jay2019"/> Martin Jay linked election rhetoric of Trump supporters as "]" to Adorno's authoritarian personality concept, saying it "counterproductively forecloses treating those it categorized as anything but objects of contempt." Jay encouraged empathy and dialogue to resolve political polarization.<ref name="Jay2019"/> | |||
In 2017, it was reported that advisor Richard Higgins was fired from the ] for publishing the memorandum '"POTUS & Political Warfare" that alleged the existence of a left-wing conspiracy to destroy ]'s presidency because "American public intellectuals of Cultural Marxism, foreign Islamicists, and ] bankers, the news media, and politicians from the Republican and Democratic parties were attacking Trump, because he represents an existential threat to the cultural Marxist memes that dominate the prevailing cultural narrative in the US."<ref name="GuardianHiggins">{{cite news |first=David |last=Smith |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/13/donald-trump-white-house-steve-bannon-rich-higgins |title=How Trump's Paranoid White House Sees 'Deep State' Enemies on all Sides |date=August 13, 2017 |newspaper=] |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=August 14, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170814084406/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/13/donald-trump-white-house-steve-bannon-rich-higgins |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |first1=Jana |last1=Winter |first2=Elias |last2=Groll |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/10/heres-the-memo-that-blew-up-the-nsc/ |title=Here's the Memo That Blew Up the NSC |date=August 10, 2017 |magazine=] |access-date=September 11, 2020 |archive-date=August 15, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815003448/http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/10/heres-the-memo-that-blew-up-the-nsc/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |first=Rosie |last=Gray |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/a-national-security-council-staffer-is-forced-out-over-a-controversial-memo/535725/ |title=An NSC Staffer Is Forced Out Over a Controversial Memo |date=August 2, 2017 |magazine=] |access-date=September 30, 2020 |archive-date=August 14, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170814175209/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/a-national-security-council-staffer-is-forced-out-over-a-controversial-memo/535725/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Higgins also asserted that the Frankfurt School "sought to deconstruct everything in order to destroy it, giving rise to society-wide nihilism."<ref name="Braune 2019"/><ref>{{cite news |first1=Jeet |last1=Heer |access-date=May 8, 2021 |title=Trump's Racism and the Myth of "Cultural Marxism" |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/144317/trumps-racism-myth-cultural-marxism |newspaper=] |date=August 15, 2017 |issn=0028-6583}}</ref><ref name="GuardianHiggins" /> The memo was read by Donald Trump Jr. who passed on a copy of it to his father.<ref name="Jeffries2021"/> | |||
], a Washington Representative from the ], is a proponent of the conspiracy theory.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wilson |first=Jason |date=November 3, 2018 |title=Washington Republican under fire for setting out 'Biblical Basis for War' |language=en-GB |work=] |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/03/matt-shea-washington-republican-biblical-basis-for-war |access-date=October 3, 2020 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=August 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200831113304/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/03/matt-shea-washington-republican-biblical-basis-for-war |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== Gamergate === | |||
] was an online harassment campaign beginning in 2014, particularly targeting women, that had the purported aim of promoting ethics in video games journalism.<ref name="Salter2017_subpolitics" /><ref name="MortensenSihvonen2020">{{cite book|last1=Mortensen|first1=Torill Elvira|last2=Sihvonen|first2=Tanja|chapter=Negative Emotions Set in Motion: The Continued Relevance of #GamerGate|title=The Palgrave Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance|pages=1353–1374|doi=10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_75|isbn=978-3-319-78440-3|editor-last1=Holt|editor-last2=Bossler|year=2020|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|chapter-url=https://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/10685 }}</ref><ref name=":2" /> Participants in Gamergate referred to their opposition as cultural Marxists, and cited free-speech grounds to justify harassing their targets.<ref name="MortensenSihvonen2020" /> Noted harassment associated with the online movement included ], ], and threats of rape and death.<ref name="Salter2017_subpolitics" /><ref name=":2" /><ref name="MortensenSihvonen2020" /> Torill Mortensen and Tanja Sihvonen described one Gamergate figure's connection of cultural Marxism with the Frankfurt School as "to a certain degree correct" but conflated with old and unfounded conspiracy theories.<ref name="MortensenSihvonen2020"/> Michael Salter noted the role of new online platforms in the abuse and hostility toward women; his analysis used elements of critical theory including ].<ref name="Salter2017_masculinity">{{cite journal |last=Salter |first=Michael |title=From geek masculinity to Gamergate: the technological rationality of online abuse |journal=Crime, Media, Culture |publisher=SAGE journals |doi=10.1177/1741659017690893 |year=2017|volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=247–264 |s2cid=152187355 }}</ref><ref name="Salter2017_subpolitics">{{cite book |last=Salter |first=Michael |chapter=Gamergate and the subpolitics of abuse in online publics |title=Crime, Justice and Social Media |editor-last=DeKeseredy |editor-first=Walter S.|isbn=9781138919679 |publisher=] |year=2017}}</ref> The ] described the Gamergate campaign as one in a number of examples of ], which it said views society as "a matriarchy propped up by 'cultural Marxism' meant to eradicate or subjugate men".<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |title=Male Supremacy |url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/male-supremacy |access-date=December 17, 2022 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*] | |||
{{div col|colwidth=22em}} | |||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
* |
*] | ||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* '']'' | |||
* |
*] | ||
* '']'' | |||
* '']'' | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== Notes == | |||
{{reflist|group=note}} | |||
== |
==References== | ||
<!--See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags--> | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
<references/> | |||
== |
==Further reading== | ||
*{{cite book | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Catlin |first1=Jonathon |title=The Frankfurt School on Antisemitism, Authoritarianism, and Right-wing Radicalism: The Politics of Unreason: The Frankfurt School and the Origins of Modern Antisemitism, by Lars Rensmann, Albany, NY, SUNY Press, 2017, xv + 600 pp., $25.95 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-43846-594-4 |journal=European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology |year=2020 |volume=7 |issue=2 |pages=198–214 |doi=10.1080/23254823.2020.1742018|s2cid=216306994 }} | |||
| author= Marcuse, Herbert | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=De Bruin |first1=Robin |title=European union as a road to serfdom: The Alt-Right's inversion of narratives on European integration |journal=Journal of Contemporary European Studies |date=2021 |volume=30 |pages=52–66 |doi=10.1080/14782804.2021.1960489|s2cid=238810398 |doi-access=free }} | |||
| authorlink = Herbert Marcuse | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Grumke |first1=Thomas |title=Die Neue Rechte — eine Gefahr für die Demokratie? |trans-title=The New Right—A Danger to Democracy? |publisher=VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften |isbn=978-3-322-81016-8 |pages=175–185 |language=de |chapter='Take this country back!': Die neue Rechte in den USA |date=2004}} | |||
| year = 1955 | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Jamin |first1=Jérôme |title=Anders Breivik et le "marxisme culturel": Etats-Unis/Europe |journal=Amnis |year=2013 |issue=12 |doi=10.4000/AMNIS.2004 |doi-access=free}} | |||
| title = Eros and civilization; a philosophical inquiry into Freud | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Jamin |first1=Jérôme |title=The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate |publisher=] UK |isbn=978-1-137-39621-1 |pages=84–103 |language=en |chapter=Cultural Marxism and the Radical Right |date=2014}} | |||
| publisher = Beacon Press | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Jamin |first1=Jérôme |title=Cultural Marxism: A survey |journal=Religion Compass |year=2018 |volume=12 |issue=1–2 |pages=e12258 |doi=10.1111/REC3.12258}} | |||
| location = Boston | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Mirrlees |first1=Tanner |title=The Alt-right's Discourse on 'Cultural Marxism': A Political Instrument of Intersectional Hate |journal=Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice |year=2018 |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=49–69 |url=https://journals.msvu.ca/index.php/atlantis/article/view/5403 |language=en |issn=1715-0698}} | |||
}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Paternotte |first1=David |last2=Verloo |first2=Mieke |title=De-democratization and the Politics of Knowledge: Unpacking the Cultural Marxism Narrative |journal=Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society |date=2021 |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=556–578 |doi=10.1093/sp/jxab025|doi-access=free}} | |||
*{{cite book | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Richardson |first1=John E. |editor1-last=Copsey |editor1-first=Nigel |editor2-last=Richardson |editor2-first=John E. |title=Cultures of Post-War British Fascism |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-53937-7 |language=en |chapter='Cultural-Marxism' and the British National Party: A transnational discourse |date=2015}} | |||
| author= Wolff, Robert Paul | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Richards |first1=Imogen |last2=Jones |first2=Callum |title=Contemporary Far-Right Thinkers and the Future of Liberal Democracy |date=2021 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-003-10517-6 |chapter=Quillette, classical liberalism, and the international New Right}} | |||
| coauthors = Marcuse, Herbert | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Woods |first1=Andrew |title=Critical Theory and the Humanities in the Age of the Alt-Right |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-030-18753-8 |pages=39–59 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_3 |language=en |chapter=Cultural Marxism and the Cathedral: Two Alt-Right Perspectives on Critical Theory |date=2019 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-18753-8_3}} | |||
| year = 1964 | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Tuters |first1=M. |title=Cultural Marxism |journal=] |year=2018 |volume=2018 |issue=2 |pages=32–34 |hdl=11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |url=https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/7b72bcec-9ad2-4dc4-8395-35b4eeae0e9e |language=en}} | |||
| title = A critique of pure tolerance | |||
| publisher = Beacon Press | |||
| location = Boston | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite journal | |||
| author = Leiss, William | |||
| authorlink = William Leiss | |||
| year = 1974 | |||
| title = Critical Theory and Its Future | |||
| journal = Political Theory | |||
| volume = 2 | |||
| issue = 3 | |||
| pages = 330–349 | |||
| doi = 10.1177/009059177400200306 | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite journal | |||
| author = Eidelberg, Paul | |||
| authorlink = Paul Eidelberg | |||
| year = 1969 | |||
| title = The Temptation of ] | |||
| journal = Review of Politics | |||
| volume = 31 | |||
| issue = 4 | |||
| pages = 442–458 | |||
| doi = 10.1017/S0034670500011785 | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite journal | |||
| author = Eidelberg, Paul | |||
| authorlink = Paul Eidelberg | |||
| year = 1970 | |||
| title = Intellectual and Moral Anarchy in American Society | |||
| journal = Review of Politics | |||
| volume = 32 | |||
| issue = 1 | |||
| pages = 32–50 | |||
| doi = 10.1017/S0034670500012560 | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite journal | |||
| author = Stokes, Jr., William S. | |||
| year = 1980 | |||
| title = Emancipation: The Politics of West German Education | |||
| journal = Review of Politics | |||
| volume = 42 | |||
| issue = 2 | |||
| pages = 191–215 | |||
| doi = 10.1017/S0034670500031442 | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite journal | |||
| author = Davies, Ioan | |||
| year = 1991 | |||
| title = British Cultural Marxism | |||
| journal = International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society | |||
| volume = 4 | |||
| issue = 3 | |||
| pages = 323–344 | |||
| doi = 10.1007/BF01386507 | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite book | |||
| last = Dworkin | |||
| first = Dennis | |||
| authorlink = Dennis Dworkin | |||
| year = 1997 | |||
| title = Cultural Marxism in Post War Britain: History, the New Left and the Origins of Cultural Studies | |||
| publisher = Duke University Press | |||
| location = Durham, N.C. | |||
| isbn = 0-8223-1914-4 | |||
}} | |||
*{{cite book | |||
| last = Gottfried | |||
| first = Paul | |||
| authorlink = Paul Gottfried | |||
| year = 2005 | |||
| title = The Strange Death of Marxism: The European Left in the New Millennium | |||
| publisher = University of Missouri Press | |||
| location = Columbia, Mo. | |||
| isbn = 0-8262-1597-1 | |||
}} | |||
* Luca Corchia, (2010). , Genova, Edizioni ECIG. ISBN 978-88-7544-195-1. | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2011}} | |||
{{Culture}} | |||
{{2011 Norway attacks}} | |||
{{alt-right footer}} | |||
{{antisemitism footer}} | |||
{{conspiracy theories}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Revision as of 04:42, 2 May 2023
Cultural Marxism refers to a school or offshoot of Marxism that conceives of culture as central to the legitimation of oppression, in addition to the economic factors that Karl Marx emphasized. An outgrowth of Western Marxism (especially Antonio Gramsci and the Frankfurt School) and finding popularity in the 1960s as cultural studies, Cultural Marxism argues that what appear as traditional cultural phenomena intrinsic to Western society, for instance the drive for individual acquisition associated with capitalism, nationalism, the nuclear family, gender roles, race and other forms of cultural identity; are historically recent developments that help to justify and maintain hierarchy. Cultural Marxists use Marxist methods (historical research, the identification of economic interest, the study of the mutually conditioning relations between parts of a social order) to try to understand the complexity of power in contemporary society and to make it possible to criticise what, cultural Marxists propose, appears natural but is in fact 'ideological'.
Explanation of the "Cultural Marxism" theory
We are, in Marx's terms, "an ensemble of social relations" and we live our lives at the core of the intersection of a number of unequal social relations based on hierarchically interrelated structures which, together, define the historical specificity of the capitalist modes of production and reproduction and underlay their observable manifestations.
— Martha E. Gimenez, Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy
According to UCLA professor and critical theorist Douglas Kellner, "Many 20th century Marxian theorists ranging from Georg Lukács, Antonio Gramsci, Ernst Bloch, Walter Benjamin, and T.W. Adorno to Fredric Jameson and Terry Eagleton employed the Marxian theory to analyze cultural forms in relation to their production, their imbrications with society and history, and their impact and influences on audiences and social life." Scholars have employed various types of Marxist social criticism to analyze cultural artifacts.
Frankfurt School and critical theory
The Frankfurt School is the name usually used to refer to a group of scholars who have been associated at one point or another over several decades with the Institute for Social Research of the University of Frankfurt, including Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Ernst Bloch, Walter Benjamin, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, Wolfgang Fritz Haug and Jürgen Habermas. In the 1930s the Institute for Social Research was forced out of Germany by the rise of the Nazi Party. In 1933, the Institute left Germany for Geneva. It then moved to New York City in 1934, where it became affiliated with Columbia University. Its journal Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung was accordingly renamed Studies in Philosophy and Social Science. It was at that moment that much of its important work began to emerge, having gained a favorable reception within American and English academia.
Among the key works of the Frankfurt School which applied Marxist categories to the study of culture were Adorno's "On Popular Music," which was written with George Simpson and published in Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences in 1941. Adorno was worried by signs of conformity in contemporary mass society and also at the conversion of individual artistic expression into the mass production of standardised commodities. He argued that popular music was, by design and promotion, "wholly antagonistic to the ideal of individuality in a free, liberal society", Adorno and Horkheimer's "The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception", originally a chapter in Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947), which argued that culture reinforced "the absolute power of capitalism", and "Culture Industry Reconsidered", a 1963 radio lecture by Adorno.
After 1945 a number of these surviving Marxists returned to both West and East Germany. Adorno and Horkheimer returned to Frankfurt in 1953 and reestablished the Institute. In West Germany in the late 1950s and early 1960s, a revived interest in Marxism produced a new generation of Marxists engaged with analyzing matters such as the cultural transformations taking place under Fordist capitalism, the impact of new types of popular music and art on traditional cultures, and maintaining the political integrity of discourse in the public sphere. This renewed interest was exemplified by the journal Das Argument. The tradition of thought associated with the Frankfurt School is Critical Theory.
Birmingham School and cultural studies
The work of the Frankfurt School and of Marxist thinker Antonio Gramsci was particularly influential in the 1960s, and had a major impact on the development of cultural studies, especially in Britain. As Douglas Kellner writes:
Cultural Marxism was highly influential throughout Europe and the Western world, especially in the 1960s when Marxian thought was at its most prestigious and procreative. Theorists like Roland Barthes and the Tel Quel group in France, Galvano Della Volpe, Lucio Colletti, and others in Italy, Fredric Jameson, Terry Eagleton, and cohort of 1960s cultural radicals in the English-speaking world, and a large number of theorists throughout the globe used cultural Marxism to develop modes of cultural studies that analyzed the production, interpretation, and reception of cultural artifacts within concrete socio-historical conditions that had contested political and ideological effects and uses. One of the most famous and influential forms of cultural studies, initially under the influence of cultural Marxism, emerged within the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham, England within a group often referred to as the Birmingham School.
Use by current Conservatives
In current politics, the term has also been associated by Conservatives with a set of values that, it is claimed, are in simple contradiction with traditional values of Western society and Christian religion. Undermining these is believed to be the true purpose of Political correctness and Multiculturalism, which are then identified with Cultural Marxism.
See also
- Anti-capitalism
- Cultural hegemony
- Cultural Studies
- Culture War
- Frankfurt School
- Freudo-Marxism
- Marxist film theory
- Marxist literary criticism
- Neo-Marxism
- Paleoconservatism
- Political correctness
- Western Marxism
References
- ^ Merquior, J.G. (1986). Western Marxism, University of California Press/Paladin Books, ISBN 0586084541
- Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy, by Martha E. Gimenez, Published (2001) in Race, Gender and Class, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 23-33.
- ^ Douglas Kellner, "Cultural Marxism and Cultural Studies,"http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalmarxism.pdf, circa 2004.
- Douglas Kellner, "Herbert Marcuse," Illuminations, University of Texas, http://www.uta.edu/huma/illuminations/kell12.htm.
- "On popular music". Originally published in: Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, New York: Institute of Social Research, 1941, IX, 17-48. See Gordon Welty "Theodor Adorno and the Culture Industry" (1984).
- Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer "Enlightment as mass deception" Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso, 1979, 120-167 (originally published as: Dialektik der Aufklärung. Amsterdam: Querido, 1947). On-line the University of Groningen website and Marxist Internet Archive. See Gordon Welty "Theodor Adorno and the Culture Industry" (1984).
- Lecture in the International Radio University Program over the Hessian Broadcasting System which was published in German in 1967, English translation in New German Critique, 6, Fall 1975, 12-19 (translated by Anson G. Rabinbach). See Gordon Welty "Theodor Adorno and the Culture Industry" (1984).
- e.g. Jürgen Habermas (1962 trans 1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society, Polity, Cambridge.
- William S. Lind (2008), Who stole our culture?
Further reading
- Marcuse, Herbert (1955). Eros and civilization; a philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Wolff, Robert Paul (1964). A critique of pure tolerance. Boston: Beacon Press.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Leiss, William (1974). "Critical Theory and Its Future". Political Theory. 2 (3): 330–349. doi:10.1177/009059177400200306.
- Eidelberg, Paul (1969). "The Temptation of Herbert Marcuse". Review of Politics. 31 (4): 442–458. doi:10.1017/S0034670500011785.
- Eidelberg, Paul (1970). "Intellectual and Moral Anarchy in American Society". Review of Politics. 32 (1): 32–50. doi:10.1017/S0034670500012560.
- Stokes, Jr., William S. (1980). "Emancipation: The Politics of West German Education". Review of Politics. 42 (2): 191–215. doi:10.1017/S0034670500031442.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Davies, Ioan (1991). "British Cultural Marxism". International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 4 (3): 323–344. doi:10.1007/BF01386507.
- Dworkin, Dennis (1997). Cultural Marxism in Post War Britain: History, the New Left and the Origins of Cultural Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-1914-4.
- Gottfried, Paul (2005). The Strange Death of Marxism: The European Left in the New Millennium. Columbia, Mo.: University of Missouri Press. ISBN 0-8262-1597-1.
- Luca Corchia, (2010). La logica dei processi culturali. Jürgen Habermas tra filosofia e sociologia, Genova, Edizioni ECIG. ISBN 978-88-7544-195-1.
Culture | |
---|---|
Outline | |
Sciences | |
Subfields |
|
Types |
|
Aspects |
|
Politics |
|
Religions | |
Related |
|