Revision as of 15:01, 15 March 2007 editSMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,689 editsm →Related information: Heading fix.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:02, 15 March 2007 edit undoSMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,689 editsm →Notable citations to Godwin's law: Heading fix.Next edit → | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
* Mike Godwin runs | * Mike Godwin runs | ||
==Notable citations to Godwin's law== | ===Notable citations to Godwin's law=== | ||
* {{cite web|author=Zonk|title=Godwin's Law Invoked in Linus/Gnome Spat|publisher=Slashdot.org|year=]|work=can't-the-nazis-stay-out-of-just-one-internet-argument|url=http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/17/0219225}} | * {{cite web|author=Zonk|title=Godwin's Law Invoked in Linus/Gnome Spat|publisher=Slashdot.org|year=]|work=can't-the-nazis-stay-out-of-just-one-internet-argument|url=http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/17/0219225}} | ||
Revision as of 15:02, 15 March 2007
Listen to this article(2 parts, 5 minutes) These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated Error: no date provided, and do not reflect subsequent edits.(Audio help · More spoken articles)
Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a mainstay of Internet culture, an adage formulated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states:
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
Godwin's Law does not dispute whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be apt. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued, that overuse of the Nazi/Hitler comparison should be avoided, as it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.
Although in one of its early forms Godwin's Law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions, the law is now applied to any threaded online discussion: electronic mailing lists, message boards, chat rooms, and more recently blog comment threads and wiki talk pages.
Godwin has stated that he introduced Godwin's law as an experiment in memetics.
Corollaries and usage
There is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's Law. Thus Godwin's Law serves to impose an upper bound on thread length in general. It is considered poor form to raise arbitrarily such a comparison with the motive of ending the thread. There is a widely recognized codicil that any such ulterior-motive invocation of Godwin's Law will be unsuccessful (this is sometimes referred to as "Quirk's Exception").
Godwin's Law does not apply to discussions directly addressing genocide, propaganda or other mainstays of the Nazi regime. Instead, it applies to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations to Hitler or Nazis. However, Godwin's Law can itself also be abused, as a distraction or diversion, to fallaciously miscast an opponent's argument as hyperbole, especially if the comparison the argument made were actually appropriate.
See also
- Benford's law of controversy
- Reductio ad Hitlerum
- Jargon File
- List of adages named after people
- Internet troll
- Hofstadter's Law
- Association fallacy
Notes and references
Footnotes
- ^ Godwin, Mike (2004-10-01). "Meme, Counter-meme". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2006-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Cyber Rights: Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age
- Godwin, Mike (1991-08-18). "Re: Nazis (was Re: Card's Article on Homosexuality". Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf-lovers. 1991Aug18.215029.19421@eff.org.
{{cite newsgroup}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - "The Jargon File (4.4.7)". Retrieved 03-01-2007.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help)
Other references
- Godwin, Mike (2004-10-01). "Meme, Counter-meme". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2006-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Weigel, David (2005-07-14). "Hands Off Hitler!: It's time to repeal Godwin's Law". Reason. Retrieved 2006-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Godwin, Mike (1995-01-12). "Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies (and Corollaries)". EFF "Net Culture - Humor" Archive. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 2006-03-24.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Sexton, Richard (1989-10-16). "Re: .aquaria (Tropical fish. Good enough for Hitler, why not you ?)". Newsgroup: news.groups. 21000@gryphon.COM.
{{cite newsgroup}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)
External links
Related information
- Godwin's Law FAQ (also )
- Godwin's Law in Ursine's Jargon Wiki
- Jurisimprudence — a listing of various fandom and Internet debate laws similar to Godwin's Law
- Mike Godwin runs a legal blog called "Godwin's Law"
Notable citations to Godwin's law
- Zonk (2007-02-17). "Godwin's Law Invoked in Linus/Gnome Spat". can't-the-nazis-stay-out-of-just-one-internet-argument. Slashdot.org.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link)