| Revision as of 12:03, 15 March 2007 editRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits remove issues older than a month← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:25, 15 March 2007 edit undoJonawiki (talk | contribs)332 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *] -- Is ] a reliable source or an extremist source? Is this article NPOV? 15:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | *] -- Is ] a reliable source or an extremist source? Is this article NPOV? 15:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] Should the ] be merged into ] or should it exist in summary style. 20:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | *] Should the ] be merged into ] or should it exist in summary style. 20:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] Should sections on recent scandals and ethnic/sex/diversity issues remain in the main article? Or should they be placed into the subsidiary article on the ] with a summary in the main history section. | |||
| *] - need input on if the article has improved or not. In particular whether it is still unbalanced with respect to ], written in a brochure style or deals with controversies in an inappropriate manner. Thanks in advance. 17:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | *] - need input on if the article has improved or not. In particular whether it is still unbalanced with respect to ], written in a brochure style or deals with controversies in an inappropriate manner. Thanks in advance. 17:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *]. Dispute over whether it is appropriate to state that all students "have at least average ability". 01:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | *]. Dispute over whether it is appropriate to state that all students "have at least average ability". 01:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:25, 15 March 2007
Shortcut- ]
- Talk:Learning organization -- Edit-war problem: Is this edit appropriate? See also User_talk:Stevenson-Perez#Your_contributions. 22:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Rebuttable Presumption -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --Jon Roland 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Conclusive Presumption -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --Jon Roland 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Presumption of innocence -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --Jon Roland 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dispute whether the Mustafa Hefny Picture added in the U.S. subsection of the White People article should be removed. 16:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Is this new and amended version of the article appropriate on its own? Please comment here.18:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Constitution -- Is a newly-added section "Principles of constitutional design" POV? 17:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Pornography_addiction#Dobson, "opponents" out -- Is James Dobson a reliable source or an extremist source? Is this article NPOV? 15:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Norouz#Merge_2 Should the Kurdish celebration of Norouz be merged into Norouz or should it exist in summary style. 20:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Waldorf education#Request for Comment - need input on if the article has improved or not. In particular whether it is still unbalanced with respect to NPOV, written in a brochure style or deals with controversies in an inappropriate manner. Thanks in advance. 17:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Great Neck South High School. Dispute over whether it is appropriate to state that all students "have at least average ability". 01:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Islamophobia. Edit warring by editors who evidently believe that there really is no such thing as Islamphobia, and the Muslims have only themselves to blame. 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Stillwater Area High School. One editor isnists on adding long sections of exhaustive detail concerning the performance of the school's sports teams. 22:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:1957 Georgia Memorial to Congress#Rfc - are recent changes to the article helpful and do they adhere to NPOV? Which of two versions of the article is preferable? 15:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:North American Man/Boy Love Association#Request for comment - This organisation espouses legalisation of sexual relationship between men and boys. A fairly heated argument has developped over whether this article should be added to Category:LGBT organizations. Further imput welcomed. 01:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:List of male performers in gay porn films - Should each entry in this list be individually sourced? -10:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Religious_views_on_masturbation#Request_for_commentsImproper use of ref tag as platform for making unsupported point. 16:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)