| Revision as of 15:04, 17 May 2023 editAlex Britan jhon (talk | contribs)2 edits →Apology note: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:45, 18 May 2023 edit undoChaitanya kalra (talk | contribs)85 edits →U have no knowledge about Sikhism.: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| :I don't really find that question to be relevant (see ]). If you want to change an article, you need to cite a source. ] (]) 15:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC) | :I don't really find that question to be relevant (see ]). If you want to change an article, you need to cite a source. ] (]) 15:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ::Please answer my question. ] (]) 21:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC) | ::Please answer my question. ] (]) 21:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == U have no knowledge about Sikhism. == | |||
| sikhism is a philosophy & theology of which elements are same in vaishnav vedanta & islam. As a north west indian, and follower of sikhism & vedanta, i know better than u bastard. Sikhism is not defined by khalsa tradition alone. Any person can be sikh if he follows the teachings of gurubani and follow these simple terms " naam japo, kirt karo, wand chhako" & " mangeyo sarbat da bhalaa". There is no religious barrier in sikhism defined by GURU NANAK JI but barrier was created by some vandals like SGPC, Akalis, & singh sabha. There are more in triple amounts of hindus that follow sikhism than khalsa followers. Khalsa is a sect of sikhism. Sikhism is not equal to khalsa. Revert by original edits that i published in sikhism & sikh related sections of Misplaced Pages. I have researched about the whole topics and reality is there are about 15 crore sikhs. akalis just marginalized & limited sikh identity for their own selfish purposes. ] (]) 04:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:45, 18 May 2023
Hello, welcome to my talk page!
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Gerdau Graphene
Can you please explain your rationale for marking Gerdau Graphene for speedy deletion? The contributions that the company has made to the graphene industry are both significant and noteworthy, evidenced by the independent editorial coverage about it. AaronEndre (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- It was obvious advertising. As a paid editor, you should not have created it in the article mainspace. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID carefully, and use the WP:AFC process next time. MrOllie (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Notes on the Ease of Using Cavalier Axonometric Projections
we can know what is the logical reason that led you to delete the following part: <copy and paste redacted> Hasanisawi (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- You can't add your own thoughts to Misplaced Pages articles, and simply adding your name is not a usable citation. See Misplaced Pages:No original research. - MrOllie (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- if the person who wrote the information has extensive experience in the field of teaching descriptive geometry, his or her name is sufficient as endorsement for the written information.
- however, I will now put my published book as a reference Hasanisawi (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- No, not on Misplaced Pages, again, read WP:NOR. Also have a look at WP:COI, you really should not be citing yourself either. MrOllie (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Apology note
I want to owe you an apology for what happened two days ago. The driver in my laptop went bad since last week and I was so upset about it, but its got a new one now. Sundropie (talk) 12:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hope you are safe. Alex Britan jhon (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Baby Einstein
Hello Ollie, I have a question, does Aigner-Clark own Kids2? Because that would be the only way that she owns Baby Einstein, WacoBell (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- I don't really find that question to be relevant (see WP:NOR). If you want to change an article, you need to cite a source. MrOllie (talk) 15:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please answer my question. WacoBell (talk) 21:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
U have no knowledge about Sikhism.
sikhism is a philosophy & theology of which elements are same in vaishnav vedanta & islam. As a north west indian, and follower of sikhism & vedanta, i know better than u bastard. Sikhism is not defined by khalsa tradition alone. Any person can be sikh if he follows the teachings of gurubani and follow these simple terms " naam japo, kirt karo, wand chhako" & " mangeyo sarbat da bhalaa". There is no religious barrier in sikhism defined by GURU NANAK JI but barrier was created by some vandals like SGPC, Akalis, & singh sabha. There are more in triple amounts of hindus that follow sikhism than khalsa followers. Khalsa is a sect of sikhism. Sikhism is not equal to khalsa. Revert by original edits that i published in sikhism & sikh related sections of Misplaced Pages. I have researched about the whole topics and reality is there are about 15 crore sikhs. akalis just marginalized & limited sikh identity for their own selfish purposes. Chaitanya kalra (talk) 04:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)