Misplaced Pages

User:Zilch-nada: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:55, 23 May 2023 editZilch-nada (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,493 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:55, 23 May 2023 edit undoZilch-nada (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,493 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
{{User deletionist}} {{User deletionist}}
{{User Anti-IAR}} {{User Anti-IAR}}
{{Userboxbottom}}.............................................................................................. {{Userboxbottom}}...................................................................................................
.

==Beliefs== ==Beliefs==


Revision as of 16:55, 23 May 2023

=================================================ZilchNada=================================================
A book read by a thousand different people is a thousand different books. - Andrei Tarkovsky

About

  • I focus on no areas in particular, and my edits come mostly from surfing the site.
Userboxes
UARThis editor believes that account creation keeps people accountable here on Misplaced Pages.
This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues.
delThis editor is a deletionist.
IARThis user disagrees with Ignore All Rules.
...................................................................................................

.

Beliefs

  • Deletionism - focus on fewer articles and make them better; less-edited articles are likely more inaccurate: it's better to be uninformed than misinformed.
  • Ambiguity, in the most general sense, is the last thing needed on Misplaced Pages. When presented with facts, there should be as few interpretations - "readings" - as possible for the reader.
  • Opposition to political Wikiprojects, as I believe they incite canvassing of ideology; a hindrance on a free encyclopaedia.
  • All statements labelled "citation needed" should be removed immediately.
  • Encyclopaediae should act like almanacs; they should be factual, plain and dispassionate, but informative.
  • Avoid nationalist assumptions; In ledes articles should not display "City, state / county", but "City, state / county, country."
Category: