Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:49, 9 June 2023

I take requests for image and source reviews on historical topics at A-Class and Featured level. Please post all requests on this page.

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: the Arab–Israeli conflict post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people the Balkans or Eastern Europe the Troubles They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Joseph Smith article - upcoming nomination at FAC

Hi Buidhe! I am here to let you (as well as the other FAC coordinators on their talk pages) know that User:P-Makoto and I intend to nominate the Joseph Smith article for Featured Article status within the next few weeks. After spending some time lurking at WP:FA and WP:FAC though, I notice that this article is lengthier and more complex than most of the articles that are nominated. I think the length is justified: Smith was and remains a very complex and controversial figure. And of course, just being complex and controversial with a long article doesn't necessarily disqualify a topic from FA status (for example, see Jesus).

That said, I'm wondering if you have any specific thoughts, questions, or comments before we jump into things? I think the length and complexity of the material has turned off some reviewers from doing a deep dive into it in the past. For example, a 2013 PR request failed to attract a single reviewer or even a comment. Is there anything you recommend to offset this a little bit?

Thanks in advance! Trevdna (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Holocaust

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Holocaust you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit at The Holocaust

Hello, Buidhe. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!

• As hard as parts of it were to read, what an absolute masterpiece you have worked on, Buidhe. A topic like this has got to be one of the most technically difficult areas to bring up to a professional standard, but you did it. A privilege to read, truly. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 12:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland closed

An arbitration case, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland, has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• The Arbitration Committee formally requests that the Wikimedia Foundation develop and promulgate a white paper on the best practices for researchers and authors when writing about Wikipedians. The Committee requests that the white paper convey to researchers the principles of our movement and give specific recommendation for researchers on how to study and write about Wikipedians and their personal information in a way that respects our principles. Upon completion, we request that the white paper be distributed through the Foundation's research networks including email newsletters, social media accounts, and web publications such as the Diff blog.This request will be sent by the Arbitration Committee to Maggie Dennis, Vice President of Community Resilience & Sustainability with the understanding that the task may be delegated as appropriate.
• Remedy 5 of Antisemitism in Poland is superseded by the following restriction: All articles and edits in the topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction. When a source that is not an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution is removed from an article, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Administrators may enforce this restriction with page protections, topic bans, or blocks; enforcement decisions should consider not merely the severity of the violation but the general disciplinary record of the editor in violation.
• François Robere is topic banned from the areas of World War II in Poland and the History of Jews in Poland, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• My very best wishes
  • is topic banned from the areas of World War II in Poland and the History of Jews in Poland, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • Based on their disruptive attempts to defend Piotrus and Volunteer Marek, My very best wishes is subject to a 1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek, subject to the usual exceptions. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Volunteer Marek
  • is topic banned from the areas of World War II in Poland and the History of Jews in Poland, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • is limited to 1 revert per page and may not revert a second time with-out a consensus for the revert, except for edits in his userspace or obvious vandalism. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• François Robere and Volunteer Marek are prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, posts and comments made by each other, subject to the normal exceptions. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• The Arbitration Committee assumes and makes indefinite the temporary interaction ban between Levivich and Volunteer Marek. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Piotrus is reminded that while off-wiki communication is allowed in most circumstances, he has previously used off-wiki communication disruptively. He is reminded to be cautious about how and when to use off-wiki contact in the future, and to avoid future conflict, he should prioritize on-wiki communication.
• The Arbitration Committee affirms its January 2022 motion allowing editors to file for Arbitration enforcement at ARCA or Arbitration enforcement noticeboards. In recognition of the overlap of editor interest and activity between this topic area and Eastern Europe, the committee extends this provision to that topic area. It does so by adding the following text in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe: As an alternative to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, editors may make enforcement requests directly to the Arbitration Committee at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
• The Arbitration Committee separately rescinds the part of the January 2022 motion allowing transfer of a case from Arbitration Enforcement to ARCA, in recognition of the now-standard provision in Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics § Referrals from Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard to the full Committee. It does so by striking the following text in its entirety in item number 7: In addition to the usual processes, a consensus of administrators at AE may refer complex or intractable issues to the Arbitration Committee for resolution at ARCA, at which point the committee may resolve the request by motion or open a case to examine the issue.
• When considering sanctions against editors in the Eastern Europe topic area, uninvolved administrators should consider past sanctions and the findings of fact and remedies issued in this case.

Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked for up to 1 year. Administrators placing blocks should take into account an editor's overall conduct and Arbitration history and seriously consider increasing the duration of blocks. Any block 3 months or longer should be reported for automatic review either (1) at ARCA or (2) to an arbitrator or clerk who will open a review at ARCA. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary, up to and including a site ban.

For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland closed

Armenian genocide and the Holocaust

With respect to your revert there, what was it you were trying to do exactly? I can't tell from your edit summary and suspect a misclick Elinruby (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Elinruby not a misclick. See the "debating genocide" chapter. Why have you added a failed verification tag when on the cited page it literally says "There can be no doubt, from the evidence I have presented in the previous chapters, that the Nazis knew of and were (at least in part) inspired by the Armenian Genocide." (t · c) buidhe 14:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring this question. The source is on the same topic alright but the source does not support your text when read as a whole. There is a very big however that follows the quoted statement. It also says nothing about the 1920, the German press, or any decisions that undefined nationalists might have made. At least not on p. 333. In addition, he does not "conclude" this, as the sentence you quote is not his conclusion. It is X in an argument that seems to go "while X, and also Y, the parallels are unmistakable." Maybe he goes into the press and so on earlier in the book; that would be just fine if cited to that page. Also FYI I removed the 4-5 citations to Jewish Virual Library per thisRfC Elinruby (talk) 02:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Elinruby The content about the great genocide debate is covered elsewhere in Ihrig's book, a different page number should be cited for it. As for the conclusion about the Nazis being inspired by the Armenian genocide, if you don't believe it is supported by the cited source I suggest posting on WP:NORN to see if this view has any merit. What JVL cites? (t · c) buidhe 03:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

yes, the correct page number needs to be cited. Hadn't thought of NORN. Re JVL, if that's confusing. let me double-check that. I edited several aricles about the Holocaust in Armenia last night. My main point however about that was just to inform you -- I also missed the RfC at the time, and did not know this until it was pointed out to me. Elinruby (talk) 03:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Aha, that was at History of the Jews in Armenia. I see you have never edited it; perhaps you would like to, if you are interested in the topic, as there are also cites there to genealogy projects and Armenian weeklies that look questionable. I left those for the moment so as not to tag bomb it too harshly. In any event, please feel free to remove the failed verification tag on Armenian genocide and the Holocaust once it has been addressed. Thanks Elinruby (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

???? There was no Holocaust in Armenia. It was never occupied by any of the Axis powers. (t · c) buidhe 05:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Um? I am unsure what you are saying. I am looking at articles on the period and Armenia has come up in a couple of places. Let me try this again.

1. The JVL references were in another article, in which you may be interested. Or not, your call.
2. You should not have deleted the cn tag on the unsourced statement, so I have replaced it.
3. The citation for the next sentence, to which you referred me, does not substantiate the sentence it follows, or the one before it on which I placed the cn tag.
4. The tags can be removed when the problems are corrected.

Over and out. Elinruby (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

AFDs

When an article is up for an AfD you cannot remove the tag. You MUST PARTICIPATE in the discussion. It has not been created yet but it will be as it is posted where it will be. Reverting it again can be determined to be an edit war. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 20:15, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò for deletion

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC

Your revert of my attempt to discuss

I am taking it to mean that you do not stand by your revert of my tagging and will be replacing the citation needed tag. The sentence that follows the one in question is indeed cited, but that source fails verification. If you do not want to do as my tagging suggests, then fine, but the referencing in that article mostly fails RS and the attention of other editors needs to be drawn to the article. Please note that both the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide fall under the contentious topic guidelines. Thank you. Elinruby (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Based on your comments above I have little faith in your ability to edit articles to accurately reflect what the sources say. The sources cited in that article are fine, although I don't really care about it anymore. You don't seem to even be able to correctly leave a contentious topics notice. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

i can but why would I? You have marked yourself as aware. As for your claim that I am not competent to judge RS, may I ask what you base this on specifically? Please. If there is something I am not seeing here, please explain it to me. Elinruby (talk) 02:23, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is LilianaUwU (yes, really). LilianaUwU 02:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German atrocities committed against Soviet prisoners of war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Buidhe. Thank you.)

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

The Misplaced Pages Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

• New partner:
  • Perlego
• Library access tips and tricks
• Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Holocaust

The article The Holocaust you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Holocaust for comments about the article, and Talk:The Holocaust/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 03:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Million Award for The Holocaust

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring The Holocaust (estimated annual readership: 2,810,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Misplaced Pages's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

How is this not a vital article? Much thanks for your work on this! – Reidgreg (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh, nevermind, I see the vital article banner is in with the WikiProjects. Thanks again. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Please relist

Can you please revert your close and relist at Talk:Federal government of the United States#Requested move 19 May 2023? You closed a few hours after I made my plea. I’d like to see some discussion on the point I made. Thanks. В²C ☎ 07:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Japanese nationalist editor - Please help

I was RC patrolling and found a bunch of pretty explicit Japanese Nationalist and Yamato Supremacist content on Soh Ohba and tried to remove it but an IP just put it back up. Its not strict vandalism so I can't just take it back down without violating 3rr. I am still relatively new to wikipedia and am not very well versed in the nuances of WP:DUE, WP:NPOV, etc and honestly I don't have the emotional energy to deal with this properly, but just ignoring it would damage the integrity of the project. I am reaching out to you because of your presence on the Nazi Affiliation task force, and as its subject area is tangential to these issues I am hoping that you are more knowledgeable and better equipped (and willing) to deal with this. — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

FenrisAureus I know little about Japan but it looks like the additions can easily be reverted as unsourced BLP. You can warn the IP and then report them at WP:EWN or alternatively request page protection at WP:RPP which is a pretty reliable way to get admin attention. (t · c) buidhe 04:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

thanks! — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 04:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

The Holocaust in Poland

Are you going to fix the numerous reference errors you have introduced into The Holocaust in Poland? DuncanHill (talk) 22:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

There was a script I was trying to use to fix it but sadly it's not working at the moment. (t · c) buidhe 23:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Overcat?

At History of the Jews in Dęblin and Irena during World War II - Category: War crimes of the Wehrmacht. Should it be removed? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Khirurg

Hello! Thank you for your response on the ANI. I think you need to take a look in the article of Albania. Even thought you agreed with me about the disputed content, the user is again reverting and denying any decision made by you. I think a sanction would not be inappropriate. Of course, that is up to you. AlexBachmann (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Just for the record: Some days ago I've reported the user Khirurg on the ANI. (So you know what I'm talking about) AlexBachmann (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for The Holocaust

On 5 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Holocaust, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that around 1,500 anti-Jewish laws were enacted by Nazi Germany in the years leading up to the Holocaust (victims pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Holocaust. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Holocaust), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

June songs

my story today

Thank you for that excellent improvement of the article! It's also featured on Portal:Germany--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Image licensing on the Commons

Hi there, dropping by because another editor recently drew my attention to this discussion, specifically the portion about image licensing. I wanted to clarify that PD-US is not a requirement for all images on the Commons; rather it’s one of many legitimate licenses for the Commons. It means that an image has no US copyright restrictions whatsoever. But some restrictions are compatible with use on the Commons and thus other WMF sites, like several Creative Commons licenses. Many Flickr images can be imported for instance despite not being in the public domain, because the person who retains copyright has licensed them for CC reuse. In general problems only arise if the license cited is not accurate to the image; my understanding is that if the Commons offers a license to apply to an image, that’s because the Commons has deemed that license sufficient basis for hosting such images. Hope that’s helpful. CCing The History Wizard of Cambridge who may wish to know. Cheers, Innisfree987 (talk) 13:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Cheers @Innisfree987, that is very good to know. When @Buidhetold me that all images needed to be PD-US, I was terrified because I very often use the PD-UK-Unknown tag. Because my specialist area is the British Empire in the 20th century, I use this tag quite often. The History Wizard of Cambridge (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

The History Wizard of Cambridge I apologize for what I wrote, which was misleading. CC licensed images are OK (if there is compatible licensing) because they have been freely licensed by the copyright holder. Images that are PD-UK but not PD-US (or freely licensed by the copyright holder) are not okay, certainly not in enwiki, because our servers are located in the US and we have to comply with US copyright law. Admittedly there are some commons users who believe that if an image is PD in one country but not the US it should be allowed on commons unless there is a takedown request, but that does not mean such images are ok to use on enwiki. Similarly, there are a lot of outright copyvios on commons and you may not use those either. (t · c) buidhe 18:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

@Buidhe you're the first editor in my three years of editing wikipedia to tell me I can't use PD-UK-Unknown. Why does the tag even exist on wiki if I can't use it? You must be mistaken, unless you can show me otherwise. The History Wizard of Cambridge (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

The History Wizard of Cambridge PD-UK-unknown is an acceptable tag, but not by itself; because images must also be PD in the US to be acceptable to use on Misplaced Pages. Examples of relevant tags would be

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929. Public domain Public domain in the United States false false

,

This image is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days) and it was first published before 1978 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities or after 1978 without copyright notice and it was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for most countries). PD-US Public domain in the United States //en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Buidhe

This file is believed to be out of copyright in its home country, as well as the US. If this is confirmed when checked, it should be transferred to Wikimedia Commons, unless the file is tagged {{Keep Local}} ,

etc. This is not my opinion, it is stated clearly in WP:Copyrights ("The Wikimedia Foundation is based in the United States and accordingly governed by United States copyright law.") and other policy and guideline pages. (t · c) buidhe 18:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Holocaust in Poland

I wanted to raise one point, as I see that you are involved in the re-write of the Holocaust in Poland article. I think that in the Background section it should be mentioned that for a time Poland was a shelter to Jews who were being persecuted and expelled from other parts of Europe. I raise this issue not to sugar-coat the history of Jews in Poland, but this was a legitimate reason why so many Jews ended up in Poland by the end of the middle-ages, eventually leading to the later events of the 20th century. However, I don't want to jump in and start re-writing the section and instead allow others to clean up the text first, but I do think this fact explains why such an exodus from western Europe to Poland happened in the first place, and there are numerous sources which cover this topic. E-960 (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

E-960 While I'm not necessarily opposed to including such content, one must also consider balance; most of the sources specifically about the Holocaust in Poland that cover background information focus on the interwar period, so that should receive more wp:weight. Also, the cited YIVO source also suggests also that these migrations had multiple causes including economic reasons. (t · c) buidhe 18:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Moral example

Hello, Buidhe,

I don't think that this AFD discussion was a good candidate for a NAC closure. Opinion was divided and it could have been closed as "No consensus". I realize that you are an experienced editor but in the future, try to pick AFD discussions to close that don't seem like they might be contested, where it is obvious what the closure should be. This seems like a close call to me. Thank you. Liz 17:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)