Misplaced Pages

Talk:Lost (TV series): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:43, 15 June 2023 edit64.229.90.172 (talk) →Requested move 13 June 2023← Previous edit Revision as of 11:18, 15 June 2023 edit undoScarletViolet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,686 edits →Requested move 13 June 2023Next edit →
Line 96: Line 96:
== Requested move 13 June 2023 == == Requested move 13 June 2023 ==


{{requested move/dated|Lost (American TV series)}} {{requested move/dated|Lost (2004 TV series)}}


] → {{no redirect|Lost (American TV series)}} – Better to mention U.S. in the article title for enough disambiguation. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC) ''']''' <small>(])</small> 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC) ] → {{no redirect|Lost (2004 TV series)}} – Better to mention U.S. in the article title for enough disambiguation. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC) ''']''' <small>(])</small> 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' The article was moved to this ] title following a . ] (]) 15:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC) *'''Comment''' The article was moved to this ] title following a . ] (]) 15:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)


Line 108: Line 108:
*'''Move to ]''' to distinguish from the same-named 2001 U.S. TV series/reality competition. See ] for a move related to that article. -- ] ] 05:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC) *'''Move to ]''' to distinguish from the same-named 2001 U.S. TV series/reality competition. See ] for a move related to that article. -- ] ] 05:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
*'''Move to ]''' per Netoholic -- ] (]) 05:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC) *'''Move to ]''' per Netoholic -- ] (]) 05:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' due to requests to move to "Lost (2004 TV series)", I will retarget the page move. ''']''' <small>(])</small> 11:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:18, 15 June 2023

Template:Vital article

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lost (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Former featured articleLost (TV series) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 3, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 14, 2006Good article nomineeListed
April 1, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 23, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 13, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
September 24, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
August 30, 2010Featured article reviewDemoted
February 5, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
May 17, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 9, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconScience Fiction Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconTelevision: Lost Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Lost task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Television Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as High-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDisney Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHawaii
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Template:WP1.0
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Archiving icon
Archives
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Long ongoing discussions
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.


Proposed merge with Mythology of Lost

Mythology of Lost should be a section of the article Lost (TV series), as Mythology of Lost is just an expansion of the article Lost. Ethanlu121 (talk) 23:44, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Episode Lists

A list of each episode from a season should be attached to the season along with any significant plot development from that episode in order to provide more context with the season descriptions. Giggleshack603 (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

IMDB user ratings

IMDB user ratings are not normally allowed. WP:UGC and MOS:TVRECEPTION both make it clear that audiences scores such as those from IMDB are user voted web polls and not reliable. The seem to have been included for quite a while (definitely back at least as far as January 2019.)

It is not clear if there was a discussion about this or a WP:LOCALCONSENUS to allow it or not (nothing like a hidden comment in the wiki source to suggest there was). Someone might argue that since these scores came from a secondary source, The Hollywood Reporter, then it is acceptable to use them. If an exception is being made it should be more clearly indicated.

There is also the problem of WP:LEAD, these scores are included in the LEAD but the intro is supposed to summarize not supplant the contents of the article. The IMDB scores are not mentioned anywhere in the article body. If people want to bend the rules to include these IMDB scores then the Reception section should mention them, and the intro should only mention them if people believe it absolutely necessary to give them that much extra emphasis (which at the moment seems WP:UNDUE).

I would recommend against making any exceptions (if there wasn't an existing consensus) and suggested removing these IMDB scores entirely. Instead as the Project TV Guidelines recommend it would be better to use the TV ratings as the best way to show audience reaction to the series was positive. -- 109.78.194.120 (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Fan reactions are generally acceptable if they're cited from a secondary reliable source, such as in this case; and The Hollywood Reporter is a top tier source, different story if it were just sourced from a blog or something. Other examples off the top of my head that talk about fan reactions include, Watchmen (TV series) which talks about its review bombing on Rotten Tomatoes, and Ozymandias (Breaking Bad) that covers its 10/10 IMDb score. I do agree though, the content should be moved out of the lede and possibly into the "Fandom and popular culture" subsection. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:28, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
It stills the same issue: "these scores are included in the LEAD but the intro is supposed to summarize not supplant the contents of the article", what makes it so important to be mentioned in the lead section, but it is not mentioned later? (CC) Tbhotch 21:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
So we're agreed it doesn't belong in the lead. I think it would be better not to include it all, but we can at least agree it should not be in the lead. I understand making an exception when there is a good reason such as an apparent split between critics and audiences, but I don't see a good reason in this case. It seems to be redundantly stating that a very popular show was very popular on IMDB. -- 109.78.194.120 (talk) 22:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace

  • X "Users of IMDbPro gave Lost the highest average ranking for any television series during the first ten years (2002–2012) of the website's operation"
  • with Y ""
    • i.e. replace it with nothing, delete/remove the sentence (and the reference to the Hollywood Reporter) from the intro entirely.

If other editors have suitable place to add it in the article body later that is a separate matter. I'd like to see WP:UGC and WP:TVRECEPTION applied consistently and the IMDB scores removed unless there is a clear consensus to make an exception. -- 109.79.73.154 (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
I went ahead and removed it myself.
Don't know how I missed that the article was only partially protected and not locked, my mistake. Apologies and thanks for your time. -- 109.79.73.154 (talk) 14:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Changing the profile picture

Hi everyone. I suggest to change the profile picture into the one of the title of the latest episode, because it suits better and the word "Lost" shows up much clearer. Could someone please do this? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.1.220.13 (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

"Lost(TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lost(TV series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 24#Lost(TV series) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

"Lost (TV series" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lost (TV series and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Lost (TV series until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 13 June 2023

It has been proposed in this section that Lost (TV series) be renamed and moved to Lost (2004 TV series).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

Lost (TV series) → Lost (2004 TV series) – Better to mention U.S. in the article title for enough disambiguation. RMXY (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC) RMXY (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

  • Support. Even if the U.S. TV series is orders of magnitude more popular than the South Korean one, it still makes sense for them to have equal levels of disambiguation. –CWenger (^ • @) 20:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment I already retargeted the move to "Lost (American TV series)". "Lost (U.S. TV series)" will still be created as redirect. RMXY (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Categories: