Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:35, 25 June 2023

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Deleting link templates

Hi there! I'm nominating a few or many templates you have created that produce many internal links. You can find it's entry here. I invite you to discuss the nomination there. SWinxy (talk) 05:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of PetaPixel for deletion

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/PetaPixel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 12:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hi Locke Cole! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Talk:2023 Nashville school shooting several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2023 Nashville school shooting, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. I meant to say "unilateral hatting" in my revert edit summary but the intent stands. You made a bold hatting, it got reverted. If you consider it gravedancing, please take it to the correct forum instead of edit warring without discussion.. Soni (talk) 06:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

When dealing with this amount of opposition, Locke Cole, you’ve got to be whiter than white. You can’t be assuming bad faith, you can’t be edit warring on the talk page. You have to try not to be hostile. You’ve got to be careful. Good luck. starship.paint (exalt) 03:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. —Locke Cole • t • c 20:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Buy Buy Baby (logo).svg

A tag has been placed on File:Buy Buy Baby (logo).svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. General Ization 16:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

The SVG is corrupt when rendered at widths < 1000 px (typically how logos are displayed in the encyclopedia). If you can repair it, please contest the deletion and do so. Thanks. General Ization 16:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

@General Ization In the future, please don't jump to CSD. I saw the issue in the tiny thumbnail (the image in the article looked fine on both the Misplaced Pages app, and on the full desktop site) and believe I've corrected it. I also took the time to add the colors from the prior logo image. Let me know if there's anything else you see wrong. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bacardi Limited (logo).svg

Thanks for uploading File:Bacardi Limited (logo).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

"AoC" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect AoC has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 13 § AoC until a consensus is reached. Randi Moth _Contribs 19:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quick note on Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Technical requests

Your request has been done. Please make the necessary changes that you described. Cheers Megan B.... till the end of time 13:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Admin backlog

Template:Admin backlog has been nominated for merging with Template:Backlog. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 23:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

File:XBOX SERIES X logo.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:XBOX SERIES X logo.svg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

WP:PA

Come on Locke, these personal attacks are unacceptable, and I would urge you to strike them. Remember what I said above? Furthermore, I don't think the extended arguments are much of a positive. starship.paint (exalt) 03:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

I don't think the entire RFC and the one that preceded it have been positive for the project. I also don't take kindly to being told I'm dumb, so that might have had something to do with it. —Locke Cole • t • c 04:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

You're free to think that the RFC is stupid, you're free to think editors are stupid, you just have to keep it to yourself. If you can't keep your cool, you're liable for sanctions, simple as that. Better to walk away than be sanctioned. starship.paint (exalt) 06:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)