| Revision as of 15:21, 19 March 2007 editBetacommand (talk | contribs)86,927 edits ←Created page with '===AaNet=== Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced ~~~~' | Revision as of 18:53, 19 March 2007 edit undoFiggyBee (talk | contribs)4,641 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced ] <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced ] <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' it seems a little ] to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least ''exists''). ] 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:53, 19 March 2007
AaNet
Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced Betacommand 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment it seems a little WP:POINT to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least exists). FiggyBee 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)