Revision as of 19:19, 19 March 2007 edit198.83.126.254 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:21, 19 March 2007 edit undoFsecret (talk | contribs)921 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This page might benefit from being further ] and partitioned into sections. | This page might benefit from being further ] and partitioned into sections. | ||
] 19:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:21, 19 March 2007
LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class | |||||||
|
WHAT?!!!!!
Why would you have a picture like this on an article were anyone could visit? It seems to me that the picture in this article shows a little too much skin. Some child under the age of 16 could go on the article if he wanted to. 12.73.120.203 20:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know where you're writing from, but in London you can see more skin than that whenever the weather gets warm enough. --Taxwoman 09:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
wikipedia is not censored and children are not harmed by sexual images when provided within an academic context, and dont you remember being a kid, whats the first word you looked up in the dictionary "sex" "bitch" anf "fuck" i bet, in junior high whatd you look up in your biology book "breasts" "penis" "sex" kids can find sex anywhere they want especially the internet and if they want to get off there are much more exiting sites to choose from than an encyclopedia just type in "sex" "blowjob" or "fucking" on google im sure your children haveQrc2006 21:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Type the word "bikini" into the search engine and you'll find far more skin. Sounds to me like you're more opposed to the actual wearing of rubber than the amount of skin exposed. Novatom 18:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
This page might benefit from being further wikified and partitioned into sections. Fsecret 19:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: