Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Zionism, race and genetics: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:30, 11 July 2023 editIskandar323 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits Zionism, race and genetics: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 19:31, 11 July 2023 edit undoIskandar323 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits Zionism, race and geneticsTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 73: Line 73:
::::There has to be a tripartite project because ''that is the subject of the article''! Wow! What are you doing here? Misplaced Pages is ] for novel research projects like this. The quote you include indicates ''nothing'' about there being a coherent subject called "Zionism, race, and genetics". In fact, I see instead an analysis that may be relevant to any number of articles we have at Misplaced Pages that are about genetics, Judaism, Israel, Zionism, etc. But this particular ''combination'' of three subjects is absolutely an attempt to shoehorn a thesis that these three subjects are somehow able to combine to form a legitimate research program. The very sources y'all are trying to cite say ''nothing'' about that, and this one doesn't either. ] (]) 19:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC) ::::There has to be a tripartite project because ''that is the subject of the article''! Wow! What are you doing here? Misplaced Pages is ] for novel research projects like this. The quote you include indicates ''nothing'' about there being a coherent subject called "Zionism, race, and genetics". In fact, I see instead an analysis that may be relevant to any number of articles we have at Misplaced Pages that are about genetics, Judaism, Israel, Zionism, etc. But this particular ''combination'' of three subjects is absolutely an attempt to shoehorn a thesis that these three subjects are somehow able to combine to form a legitimate research program. The very sources y'all are trying to cite say ''nothing'' about that, and this one doesn't either. ] (]) 19:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::Your comment above dismissing the SIGCOV was made within 1 minute of being shown the sources. You are expected to try to read them before commenting on them. ] (]) 19:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC) :::::Your comment above dismissing the SIGCOV was made within 1 minute of being shown the sources. You are expected to try to read them before commenting on them. ] (]) 19:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::Form a research programme? Huh? What do you mean? The only aim here is to produce a page on a pre-existing subject covered in numerous sources. That the page title contains three words that you perceive as three separate subjects is incidental. There was already a discussion raised about whether the title was apt; one that you could have participated in. There are several ways on which the article could probably be phrased as just two things, if that is your peccadillo. It could just add equally have been named 'Zionism and race science' or 'Zionism and racial politics'. These would both have been dualistic titles for much the same material already presented. That the title as it stands uses three terms is by-the-by, and if that is your only complaint then it is a naming issue, not a notability one. ] (]) 19:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC) :::::Form a research programme? Huh? What do you mean? The only aim here is to produce a page on a pre-existing subject covered in numerous sources. That the page title contains three words that you perceive as three separate subjects is incidental. There was already a discussion raised about whether the title was apt; one that you could have participated in. There are several ways on which the article could probably be phrased as just two things, if that is your peccadillo. It could just as equally have been named 'Zionism and race science' or 'Zionism and racial politics'. These would both have been dualistic titles for much the same material already presented. That the title as it stands uses three terms is by-the-by, and if that is your only complaint then it is a naming issue, not a notability one. ] (]) 19:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 19:31, 11 July 2023

Zionism, race and genetics

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Zionism, race and genetics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Oh my, this article is ostensibly on a triply compound topic Zionism, race (human categorization) and genetics. Wow. To be clear, doubly compound topics in Misplaced Pages have had a history of being interrogated carefully. Only when there are significant and serious treatments which identify a compound topic as significantly addressed as a topic in reliable sources (Science and technology studies, for example) do we ever have a way for Misplaced Pages's intentionally conservative and non-innovative reference machinery to document the subject. In this case, the article reads a lot like a original research program that is not indicative of active tripartite treatments combining these three subjects. As such, the article is a textbook example of WP:SYNTH. It is not for Misplaced Pages. jps (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


List of sources
Onceinawhile (talk) 18:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
None of those sources discusses a tripartite project called "Zionism, race, and genetics". None of them. What possesses you to think otherwise? jps (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Why does there have to be a tripartite project? Whatever that is. Anyway
Abu El-Haj, Nadia (2012). The Genealogical Science: The Search for Jewish Origins and the Politics of Epistemology. Chicago Studies in Practices of Meaning. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-20142-9. Retrieved 2023-07-08.
Discusses all three elements.
Quote from the source
"As I argue through a reading of scientific studies of “the genetics of the Jews” published in the 1950s and 1960s, while Zionism presumed the existence of the Jewish people, the founding of the Jewish state put that ideological commitment to the test. What is evident in the work in Israeli population genetics is a desire to identify biological evidence for the presumption of a common Jewish peoplehood whose truth was hard to “see,” especially in the face of the arrival of oriental Jews whose presumably visible civilizational and phenotypic differences from the Ashkenazi elite strained the nationalist ideology upon which the state was founded. Testament to the legacy of racial thought in giving form to a Zionist vision of Jewish peoplehood by the mid-twentieth century, Israeli population researchers never doubted that biological facts of a shared origin did indeed exist, even as finding those facts remained forever elusive."
Selfstudier (talk) 19:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
There has to be a tripartite project because that is the subject of the article! Wow! What are you doing here? Misplaced Pages is WP:NOT for novel research projects like this. The quote you include indicates nothing about there being a coherent subject called "Zionism, race, and genetics". In fact, I see instead an analysis that may be relevant to any number of articles we have at Misplaced Pages that are about genetics, Judaism, Israel, Zionism, etc. But this particular combination of three subjects is absolutely an attempt to shoehorn a thesis that these three subjects are somehow able to combine to form a legitimate research program. The very sources y'all are trying to cite say nothing about that, and this one doesn't either. jps (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Your comment above dismissing the SIGCOV was made within 1 minute of being shown the sources. You are expected to try to read them before commenting on them. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Form a research programme? Huh? What do you mean? The only aim here is to produce a page on a pre-existing subject covered in numerous sources. That the page title contains three words that you perceive as three separate subjects is incidental. There was already a discussion raised about whether the title was apt; one that you could have participated in. There are several ways on which the article could probably be phrased as just two things, if that is your peccadillo. It could just as equally have been named 'Zionism and race science' or 'Zionism and racial politics'. These would both have been dualistic titles for much the same material already presented. That the title as it stands uses three terms is by-the-by, and if that is your only complaint then it is a naming issue, not a notability one. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Categories: