| Revision as of 06:15, 15 July 2023 editCX Zoom (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers19,312 edits →Shall we make a list?: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:49, 15 July 2023 edit undoBusterD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators44,651 edits →Shall we make a list?: jeezNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| == Shall we make a list? == | == Shall we make a list? == | ||
| Given ] about recent ] procedures I thought it valid to raise this question: A) Shouldn't we just make a list of unacceptable things a user might disclose about themselves? It's clear from recent procedures here there are concerns about the intent of various wikipedians who use infoboxes to describe themselves on their userpage. B) Would we intervene if the user merely wrote the same thing in plain text on their userpage? (ex. "I am a young adult") C) Why or why not? | Given ] about recent ] procedures I thought it valid to raise this question: A) Shouldn't we just make a list of unacceptable things a user might disclose about themselves? It's clear from recent procedures here there are concerns about the intent of various wikipedians who use infoboxes to describe themselves on their userpage. B) Would we intervene if the user merely wrote the same thing in plain text on their userpage? (ex. "I am a young adult") C) Why or why not? | ||
| #Nazis | #Nazis | ||
| #Neo-Confederates | #Neo-Confederates | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| :Why is atheism controversial? <span class="nowrap">—''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 06:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | :Why is atheism controversial? <span class="nowrap">—''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 06:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :Also, I suspect you meant "userbox", not "infobox". <span class="nowrap">—''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 06:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | :Also, I suspect you meant "userbox", not "infobox". <span class="nowrap">—''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 06:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ::D'oh! ] (]) 12:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:49, 15 July 2023
 | On February 2011, it was proposed that this page be moved from Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion to Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for discussion. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
| On May 2016, it was proposed that this page be moved from Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion to Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for discussion. The result of the discussion was no consensus (not moved). |
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
More BFDI crap
User:ImJustThere/sandbox (WP:FAKEARTICLE)
WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:G5 118.149.73.92 (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Seeking guidance
There are a number of drafts with the same issue that I believe are subject to deletion outside the usual guidelines of draft deletion. In each instance it's a case of WP:PUFFERY, and there has been no attempt to make the articles even remotely acceptable. They all either rely on one source (the generally unreliable Cage Match) or have no sources at all. The drafts are Future Wrestling Australia, New Horizons Pro Wrestling, Newcastle Pro Wrestling, Southern Hemeisphere Wrestling Alliance, Southern Territory Wrestling and Wrestle Rampage. I believe they are being maintained to provide the users of a record of the title reigns and they have no intention of submitting the drafts for review. I think only one was actually submitted and it was declined. This should be done as a job lot but I don't know how to do that, and I don't have the time to nominate them one by one. Addicted4517 (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- a response here would be much appreciated, please. Addicted4517 (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Foster (2023 film)
Please create a deletion discussion page for this draft. 216.154.16.163 (talk) 18:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Horrible use of time travel
Draft talk:Under the Boardwalk (2024 film)
WP:CRUFT 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:C8:679C:9AB8:ACDD (talk) 15:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
User:Bruno Rene Vargas/Cocaine Bear (film)
Live Misplaced Pages article about this film already exists: Cocaine Bear; there is no need to keep this user page around. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:C8:679C:9AB8:ACDD (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- This IP ha tagged two pages for MfD: User:Bruno Rene Vargas/Cocaine Bear (film) and Draft talk:Under the Boardwalk (2024 film) but did not create a nomination page for them. —CX Zoom 22:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Please create the discussion pages. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:E465:EB69:BF83:5041 (talk) 16:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Shall we make a list?
Given my strong feelings about recent infobox userbox deletion procedures I thought it valid to raise this question: A) Shouldn't we just make a list of unacceptable things a user might disclose about themselves? It's clear from recent procedures here there are concerns about the intent of various wikipedians who use infoboxes to describe themselves on their userpage. B) Would we intervene if the user merely wrote the same thing in plain text on their userpage? (ex. "I am a young adult") C) Why or why not?
- Nazis
- Neo-Confederates
- Homophobia
- Transphobia
- Anti-atheism
- Atheism
- I am a young adult
I'm sure there are many other potentially offensive things we might list so users recognize exactly where the boundaries exist on personal disclosure. BusterD (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Exactly.
- On the first four, free text on a userpage probably will tend more to a reasonable statement in the user’s academic interest in that topic, and less to a mob slogan like Userboxes often resemble.
- 5&6 is probably still too taboo for Misplaced Pages to make internal rules on.
- Number 7 is a newish new worry. A moral panic, just Think of the children and silence them, lock them away, Misplaced Pages must not be a welcoming place for children? We have a very sensible looking policy at Misplaced Pages:Child protection, and excellent advice at Misplaced Pages:Guidance for younger editors and Misplaced Pages:Advice for parents, I don’t know why a couple of oversighters are getting ahead of policy, and trying to push policy in practice with vague reference to their special experiences (False authority).
- - SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Why is atheism controversial? —CX Zoom 06:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also, I suspect you meant "userbox", not "infobox". —CX Zoom 06:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- D'oh! BusterD (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)