Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:50, 15 July 2023

Michael Tritter is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones Date Process Result October 21, 2008 Good article nominee Listed December 23, 2008 Peer review Reviewed January 31, 2009 Featured article candidate Promoted April 12, 2009 Articles for deletion Kept A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 10, 2008.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the House character Detective Michael Tritter has been compared to Inspector Javert in Les Misérables? Current status: Featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Television: House Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the House task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Reference ideas for Michael TritterThe following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Bianco, Robert (2006-11-07). "What to watch, what to save". USA Today. ISSN 0734-7456. Archived from the original on 2006-11-07. Retrieved 2023-07-15. Bianco, Robert (2006-10-30). "What to watch Tuesday". USA Today. ISSN 0734-7456. Archived from the original on 2022-08-15. Retrieved 2023-07-15. Stasi, Linda (2006-10-31). "Big as a 'House'". New York Post. ISSN 2641-4139. OCLC 12032860. Archived from the original on 2006-11-30. Retrieved 2023-07-15.

The Holmes Connection

Referencing the version of 07:29, 7 December 2006: Hardly "all" of the characters on House have a connection with Holmes stories; only House and Wilson are convincingly documented as far as I've seen. Tritter's connection with Moriarty, apart from being a "nemesis", is a stretch. For one thing, there is a clear good vs. evil in Holmes vs. Moriarty, whereas both House and Tritter are deeply flawed, and a good argument could be made that Tritter has a better claim on the right than House does. A lot of interesting things could be written about Tritter, his actions, his methods, etc., but I'm removing this section as irrelevent. Please discuss any objections. --BlueMoonlet 20:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I'd have to agree. House's nemesis goes more to the root of Moriarty's name--la mort. Death itself. Tritter? Not so much. Also, House isn't chasing him; it's vice-versa, so the dynamic doesn't work.192.80.65.234

Proposed trim of Storyline section

I think the storyline section goes into a great deal of unnecessary detail. Here is my first stab at trimming it.

Tritter first appears in the episode "Fools for Love". His character is a police detective who becomes a patient of the walk-in clinic who suffers from a severe irritation in the area of his groin, which he believes to be caused by a sexually transmitted disease. Although House diagnoses Tritter with dry skin, a common side effect of the nicotine gum that Tritter is chewing, Tritter requests that a sample be tested. House declines on the grounds that he has already met this month's quota for indulging "stubborn idiots". After Tritter causes House to trip, the doctor feigns acquiescence, but insists he has to take Tritter's temperature rectally. After inserting the thermometer, House leaves the room with no intention of returning. Tritter later complains about his treatment to House's boss, Lisa Cuddy (Lisa Edelstein), but House refuses to apologize even after Tritter says that he would rather "beat the crap out of" House than sue him. Later that night, Tritter pulls House over for a traffic violation and arrests House after finding unprescribed Vicodin pills in his pocket.

In the next episode, "Que Sera Sera", Tritter searches House's apartment and finds a large quantity of Vicodin pills and two apparently forged prescriptions that bore the name of House's friend, James Wilson (Robert Sean Leonard). During "Son of Coma Guy" and "Whac-A-Mole", Tritter pressures Wilson and members of House's diagnostic team to testify against him, but they all refuse. In "Finding Judas", Cuddy finds Tritter spending his day off looking through the hospital's log for evidence against House. She accuses him of not having a life and "personalizing every slight". Tritter responds that "nobody is innocent", as everyone allows House to treat patients despite knowing of his Vicodin addiction, and that it takes a police detective to uncover what the doctors are deliberately hiding. At the end of the episode, Wilson visits Tritter and indicates his willingness to testify.

In "Merry Little Christmas", Tritter and Wilson work out a deal to allow House to continue practicing medicine if he pleads guilty and spends two months in rehab. Meanwhile, House uses a dead patient's name to obtain Oxycodone pills as a Vicodin replacement drug, but when House visits Tritter early the next morning to agree to the deal, after going through the pharmacy's log and reading that House signed for a dead man's drugs, Tritter says the deal is off.

In the final days leading up to House's court case, House realizes the severity of the situation and finally apologizes to Tritter. When Tritter refuses to accept the apology, House goes into rehab, putting on a show for Tritter and the judge, but Tritter cites his past experiences with addicts as evidence House has not changed. The judge tells Tritter that she does not believe House to be the drug addict that Tritter tried to show him to be, and orders Tritter to move on. Just before the bailiff escorts House out of the courtroom, Tritter tells him, "Good luck. I hope I'm wrong about you."

Thoughts? Karanacs (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Good, but I don't fully understand the third paragraph, how about:

In "Merry Little Christmas", Tritter and Wilson work out a deal to allow House to continue practicing medicine if he pleads guilty and spends two months in rehab. Meanwhile, House uses a dead patient's name to obtain Oxycodone pills as a Vicodin replacement drug. When he visits Tritter early the next morning to agree to the deal, Tritter says the deal is off, after going through the pharmacy's log and reading that House signed for a dead man's drugs.

Reads better to me. Also, you mention in the first paragraph that Tritter says he would rather beat the crap out of House that sue him, before House refuses to apologize, but it is actually stated afterwards. No further comments; nice job.--Music26/11 16:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Excellent. I'll move the combined changes to the article. Karanacs (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

References

1. Shore, David; Blake, Peter (October 31, 2006). "Fools for Love". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 5. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap
2. Shore, David; Moran, Thomas L. (November 7, 2006). "Que Sera Sera". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 6. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap
3. Shore, David; Egan, Doris (November 14, 2006). "Son of Coma Guy". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 7. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap
4. Shore, David; Davis, Pam (November 21, 2006). "Whac-A-Mole". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 8. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap
5. Shore, David; Hass, Sara (November 28, 2006). "Finding Judas". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 9. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap
6. ^ Shore, David; Friedman, Liz (December 12, 2006). "Merry Little Christmas". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 10. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap
7. Shore, David; Dick, Leonard (January 1, 2007). "Words and Deeds". House, M.D.. Season 3. Episode 10. FOX. Television Without Pity Recap

FA?

This reads like a pastiche of an encyclopedia article, cruft dressed up in leaden prose; everything seems to pass FA these days if only there are enough inline citations, no matter what they cite. --Janneman (talk) 02:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, in my opinion this is pretty terrible. (76.189.146.206 (talk) 03:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC))

Not even the main character of the show's page is a Featured Article yet! How does this pass the editors?PokeHomsar (talk) 03:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Here's a link to the discussion where consensus was to promote to FA. Articles are not judged on their "importance" or "significance", but rather their quality. –Juliancolton |  04:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

But shouldn't importance be taken into account? I mean, come on, you'll seriously tell me an article about the inventor of creamed corn could become featured? Why feature something that doesn't matter, especially about a story arc that is considered one of the poorer ones in the series?PokeHomsar (talk) 04:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Why not? If people put the effort in, why shouldn't we acknowledge the quality? And yes, the inventor of "creamed corn" could become featured if the article was written well enough. Ironholds (talk) 06:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Is it ironic if a member of "The Legend of Zelda" Wikiproject is complaining about "unimportant" articles being promoted to FA? --Contributions/86.142.97.137 (talk) 09:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Personally I thought this was a horribly poorly written story arc but whatevs I guess somebody liked it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.150.152 (talk) 04:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

oooh, a thermometer stuck in his rectum? not only is this great writing for a television show, but great writing for Misplaced Pages. (sarcasm, of course) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.37.76 (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I liked the arc. Ended a bit too weakly, but it's great to see House articles of high quality. RichsLaw (talk) 09:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

This article is a very small article. It is just a few paragraphs long. If I were to have rated it I would have given it a B class at tops. Also {{reqphoto}} can be considered a maintenance template. Irunongames • play 10:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Importance is not an FA criteria. Length is not an FA criteria. quality and depth of coverage is an FA criteria. If the article covers the subject in detail, in depth and in a well-written way, it should be considered a featured article, i.e one of the best articles on en-wiki (see best, not longest). And since reqphoto isn't here, that isn't an issue. Ironholds (talk) 12:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

If significance isn't a factor in determining whether or not something should be featured, it should be from now on. I checked out the discussion leading up to the decision to feature this article, and the guy or girl who said that 'it would be embarrassing to the project if this ever showed up on the main page' is exactly right: I was embarrassed to find this on the front page of wikipedia. No judgment on the show or people's work on this piece, it's just not something you want to see up on the front page as representing the best of the wiki project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.177.195.238 (talk) 12:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Why? We can't tell people what to work on if they're not interested in other things. Any article on any subject, if it passes certain standards, can be considered Featured. "significance" for articles is whether or not they're notable, and if an article wasn't notable it wouldn't be here. Ironholds (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

What the anon said. They've done a lot of good work on it, but it's a character from a TV show. It's silly for it to be on top. Importance isn't (or shouldn't be) a black and white thing. --AW (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

But the problem with labeling one article as "silly" over another is that it's one editor's POV vs. another's. That's why we have objective quality-based criteria for articles' rating as opposed to just focusing on what some editors consider the "important" ones. — pd_THOR | 14:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Importance is entirely subjective, and I'm quite shocked to see long-term editors saying a subject "isn't important enough" to be considered a quality article. Ironholds (talk) 14:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

But doesn't the {{reqphoto}} template count as maintenance? That voids the whole article no matter what Irunongames • play 19:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know if {{reqphoto}} counts as a maintenance template or not, however the template is not applied to this article currently. The photo of Mr. Morse was a part of this article's FAC, and requesting a copyrighted one to replace a libre one is a quick failure of the non-free content policy. Lastly, simply having a maintenance template does not automatically strip an article of its featured status, one would need to instigate a featured article review to accomplish that goal. — pd_THOR | 20:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Why is this the featured article?

He's a character from House! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Klotz (talk • contribs) 12:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Benders Game 15:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

T'ain't what you do, it's the way that you do it. Postdlf (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

what another great FA from wikipedia! Mr Poechalkdust (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh yay, you again. FA is based on quality. Not importance, which is subjective, or length, which is irrelevant. By definition any FA is a "great" FA. Ironholds (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality is the archetypal subjective measure. The problem is that importance is hard to define, especially when community consensus is involved. |→ Spaully† 20:52, 15 June 2009 (GMT)

I came here to say the same thing. This is stupid. I like House and all, but why does an extremely minor character from that television series have an FA while David Morse, the real guy behind the character, has a crap article? Stupid.--Jeff (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Like wow. The fact that this article has FA status shows some people have NO LIFE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.75.106.183 (talk) 23:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I really like how we're all being civil </sarcasm>. It's just an article, I don't know why you care that much that it's featured. People like writing articles, so why do we need to discriminate on what articles we write? As long as they stay inside the policies and guidelines, it shouldn't really matter. Plus, Michael Jackson's health and appearance is a GA, so I see no need to whine. Renaissancee (talk) 03:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I have not seen that article before. –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, it is an important and very talked about subject. Pyrrhus16 19:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't really think your appearance is importance, whether your not so fabulous or a supermodel, and your health doesn't really mean anything notable unless you have a rare disease. Renaissancee (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

How could this have possibly become a featured article with all the duplication? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.221.174 (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

This is probably the most useless and poorly written article on wikipedia. 125.236.179.52 (talk) 01:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Michael Tritter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080913230704/http://www.austin360.com:80/tv/content/tv/stories/2006/11/9davidmorse.html to http://www.austin360.com/tv/content/tv/stories/2006/11/9davidmorse.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080516093135/http://blogcritics.org:80/archives/2008/04/10/1158232.php to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/04/10/1158232.php
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120306022652/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/house/fools_for_love.php?page=11 to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/house/fools_for_love.php?page=11
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080916231408/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com:80/show/house/que_ser_ser.php to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/house/que_ser_ser.php
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080515194730/http://emmys.org/awards/2007pt/59thnominations.php to http://www.emmys.org/awards/2007pt/59thnominations.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Tritter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914195449/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2006/10/the_tease_house.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2006/10/the_tease_house.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Tritter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012192841/http://weblogs.variety.com/on_the_air/2007/07/emmys-oddities-.html to http://weblogs.variety.com/on_the_air/2007/07/emmys-oddities-.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

date format?

Why are we using {{use dmy dates}}? It's an American character in an US television series. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

With no responses, I've instead applied {{use mdy dates}} (as is also used at this page's parent articles). — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Seriously doubting the need for this as a standalone page

This is a character that appears in six out of a total 177 episodes of House, and he already has a (in my opinion, adequate) section in the dedicated article for House characters. I see no reason for this article to exist. Leaflemon (talk) 03:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

I don't think you're precluded from taking this to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, but you may want to familiarize yourself with the previous deletion attempt, first. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages featured articles
• Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page
• Old requests for peer review
• Misplaced Pages Did you know articles that are featured articles
• All unassessed articles
• FA-Class television articles
• Low-importance television articles
• FA-Class House articles
• Mid-importance House articles
• House task force articles
• WikiProject Television articles
• FA-Class fictional character articles
• WikiProject Fictional characters articles