User talk:Denaar: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:08, 17 July 2023 editDenaar (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,526 edits talk page cleanup.← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:34, 19 July 2023 edit undoDarknipples (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,342 edits →GAG: new sectionTag: New topic Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	: Denaar, This appears to me to be an obsolete notice that no longer represents the current guidance of the ] on this topic. I believe that this notice was placed ], and an admin might interpret it as a good-enough proxy for the correct one, so it's probably wise to read the current advice about ] in general, and more particularly the one about ]. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. {{nacc}} ] (]) 03:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)		: Denaar, This appears to me to be an obsolete notice that no longer represents the current guidance of the ] on this topic. I believe that this notice was placed ], and an admin might interpret it as a good-enough proxy for the correct one, so it's probably wise to read the current advice about ] in general, and more particularly the one about ]. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. {{nacc}} ] (]) 03:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
	::The article I was working on wasn't tagged - and I didn't realize it was a minefield at the time! I appreciate the correct link. ] (]) 03:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)		::The article I was working on wasn't tagged - and I didn't realize it was a minefield at the time! I appreciate the correct link. ] (]) 03:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

			== GAG ==

			I think you make a lot of improvements that I do agree with, and I don't mean to come off as stonewalling or confrontational. I appreciate your conviction and resolve to adhere to 5p, I just don't see the way this topic is being treated as changing the lens through which policy is viewed. It seems like STATUS QUO to me. ] (]) 08:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:34, 19 July 2023

This is Denaar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

If you would like to discuss an edit I make, please do so on the talk page of that article. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative place, it's ok to disagree on article direction! The talk pages are there to help generate consensus about the article. If you bring article discussion here, I'll move it to the talk page of that article and respond there. Denaar (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Important alert

This appears to be an obsolete AC/DS notice from the pre-CTopics era.

This appears to be an obsolete AC/DS notice from the pre-CTopics era.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not* imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.* You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place `{{Ds/aware}}` on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Editorkamran (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Editorkamran (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Denaar, This appears to me to be an obsolete notice that no longer represents the current guidance of the Arbitration Committee on this topic. I believe that this notice was placed in good faith, and an admin might interpret it as a good-enough proxy for the correct one, so it's probably wise to read the current advice about contentious topics in general, and more particularly the one about India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. (Non-administrator comment) Mathglot (talk) 03:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

The article I was working on wasn't tagged - and I didn't realize it was a minefield at the time! I appreciate the correct link. Denaar (talk) 03:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

GAG

I think you make a lot of improvements that I do agree with, and I don't mean to come off as stonewalling or confrontational. I appreciate your conviction and resolve to adhere to 5p, I just don't see the way this topic is being treated as changing the lens through which policy is viewed. It seems like STATUS QUO to me. DN (talk) 08:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)