| Revision as of 20:20, 20 March 2007 view sourceDev920 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers11,497 edits Bailey← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:16, 21 March 2007 view source David Shankbone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,979 edits →SockpuppetryNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| Who to who? --] 14:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | Who to who? --] 14:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::It's understandable. You know, I have moments in my history where I got out of hand, or was too emotional in my editing, but I always recognized it. I certainly wasn't fooling myself. It's amazing when people can't see their own behavior. As if a Talk page of warnings, blocks and responses full of snide, defensive remarks isn't evidence enough... Hopefully Ivo will make some good edits. He seems pretty reasonable. But there are now 9 editors in support...this doesn't seem to be all the controversial except for one persistent editor who can't keep his finger off the "Refresh" button for his watchlist. Even other editors who initially seemed to voice lukewarm support for his position have backed away, likely due to his war cries. <sigh> --] 14:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | ::It's understandable. You know, I have moments in my history where I got out of hand, or was too emotional in my editing, but I always recognized it. I certainly wasn't fooling myself. It's amazing when people can't see their own behavior. As if a Talk page of warnings, blocks and responses full of snide, defensive remarks isn't evidence enough... Hopefully Ivo will make some good edits. He seems pretty reasonable. But there are now 9 editors in support...this doesn't seem to be all the controversial except for one persistent editor who can't keep his finger off the "Refresh" button for his watchlist. Even other editors who initially seemed to voice lukewarm support for his position have backed away, likely due to his war cries. <sigh> --] 14:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| I dare you to propose this sentence for the lead in the Buchanan article: '''James Buchanan''' (April 23, 1791 – June 1, 1868), also known as '''Aunt Fancy''', was the 15th president of the United States (1857–1861). | |||
| LOL - --] 03:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi == | == Hi == | ||
Revision as of 03:16, 21 March 2007
|
| 1 2 3 4 |
| 5 6 7 8 |
Toot own horn
My article Tompkins Square Park Police Riot just passed GA status! Woo-hoo! Now I'm waiting on Evan Wolfson... --David Shankbone 16:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm waiting for Wolfson to be reviewed. I'd like to submit the riot article for FA status. Hey, did you read about this poor fellow: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201640.html --David Shankbone 12:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Please contact me
Jeff: I could not find a link on your talk page to send you a private message. If you are so inclined, could you visit my talk page and send me an email? I have something I'd like to discuss with you. Thanks. Labyrinth13 17:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Email sent to you today via the Wiki-link on your talk page. Labyrinth13 17:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
Who to who? --David Shankbone 14:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's understandable. You know, I have moments in my history where I got out of hand, or was too emotional in my editing, but I always recognized it. I certainly wasn't fooling myself. It's amazing when people can't see their own behavior. As if a Talk page of warnings, blocks and responses full of snide, defensive remarks isn't evidence enough... Hopefully Ivo will make some good edits. He seems pretty reasonable. But there are now 9 editors in support...this doesn't seem to be all the controversial except for one persistent editor who can't keep his finger off the "Refresh" button for his watchlist. Even other editors who initially seemed to voice lukewarm support for his position have backed away, likely due to his war cries. <sigh> --David Shankbone 14:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I dare you to propose this sentence for the lead in the Buchanan article: James Buchanan (April 23, 1791 – June 1, 1868), also known as Aunt Fancy, was the 15th president of the United States (1857–1861).
LOL - --David Shankbone 03:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Hi Jeff.
I noticed that, on your userpage, you had the following message:
- 5) Making sure that Misplaced Pages stays safe for all.
Is there any particular reason you have included the text? I consider it fairly likely I will become an admin in the future and I'd prefer you pointed out what I've done wrong instead of posting a rant on your userpage. Yuser31415 20:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yuser, have you actually read any of the diffs provided in your RfA? You aren't going become an admin for a very, very long time, if at all. You apparently have too much of a 'tude, don't edit in the mainspace enough, and argue even when you're shown to be in the wrong. Seriously, go do something where you'll be appreciated, like write an FA or try your hand at mediation. Trying again at RfA before the summer will be an exercise in masochism. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Bailey
Quote policy the way others can quote catechism? Please, you have to do more than say "WP:REDFLAG!!" over and over to be a true wikicatechumen. :) But you're right, it is a bit odd. On the other hand, vandalism patrol is often something that seems to appeal to men when they first sign up, so he may well be legit. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)