| Revision as of 03:13, 15 October 2016 editరవిచంద్ర (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users3,408 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:56, 30 July 2023 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,240 editsm Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell|class=}} | |||
| ], you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--] (]) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ], you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--] (]) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | :I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:56, 30 July 2023
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. |
User:Champion, you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--Ravichandra (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --Ravichandra (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)