Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:41, 3 August 2023 editAkshadev (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,894 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit Revision as of 12:41, 3 August 2023 edit undoErtoe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users991 edits Requesting protection for Seybold BuildingNext edit →
Line 49: Line 49:
* {{pagelinks|I-League 3}} * {{pagelinks|I-League 3}}
'''Semi protection:''' High level of IP vandalism. — ] ] 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC) '''Semi protection:''' High level of IP vandalism. — ] ] 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

=== ] ===
* {{pagelinks|Seybold Building}}
'''Reason:''' persistent promotion and advertising from IPs and sockpuppets which has been going on at least 2 years ] (]) 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:41, 3 August 2023

Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection

Michael Jai White

Reason: This is one of the actors that have contradicting birth years online. According to the Associated Press(which is considered reliable) he turned 58 last fall. Which would make his birth year 1964. However various editors keep changing it to 1967 while either ignoring the cited source or even outright removing it. Kcj5062 (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Note: There is a discussion on the article talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hash it out on the article talk-page. Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

2023 Manipur violence

Allow only extended confirmed users : Persistent removal of sourced contents and addition of highly biased one sided contents, by newly created accounts (which have become autoconfirmed users), resulting to persistent edit war, between multiple people. --Haoreima (talk) 09:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:19, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Paris Jackson

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More than two years of IP-hopping attempts to change eye colour from sourced "blue" to "green". Talk page thread, and IP warnings ineffective. Meters (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Qingdao Airlines

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer  10:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Arkhalig

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I requested protection yesterday on a WP:GS/AA article and explained the reason of IP disruption . The article wasn't protected and the disruption continued, to the point of edit-warring and IP likely making an account to do the same WP:JDLI revert , , . I'm asking for this article to be protected to avoid wasting community time, clearly the IP doesn't listen to any rationale and just adds their original research. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

RAS syndrome

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – constant, increasingly uncivil vandalism from an ip hopper who describes their claim as "factual" and sources saying the opposite as "erroneous". cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 12:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Endorse long term semi-protection, ideally extended-confirmed protection, owing to the fact that the IP has vowed to continue edit warring once their block is over. — Czello 12:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
diffs: 1 (accusation of edit warring when all prior edits were reverted by different people), 2 (taking the discussion to the talk page, with no intention of actual discussion)
was previously asked by czello to try to achieve consensus (here), but they do the same every time: say the claim is true with the equivalent of "source: trust me dude", place the burden of disproof on the previously sourced claim, and go back to edit warring
the article is currently whitelocked, but i don't think it's working to stop this fiasco cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 12:37, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Ed Asner filmography

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism/spamming Groupthink (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

I-League, I-League 3

Semi protection: High level of IP vandalism. — Akshadév™ 💬 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Seybold Building

Reason: persistent promotion and advertising from IPs and sockpuppets which has been going on at least 2 years Ertoe (talk) 12:41, 3 August 2023 (UTC)