Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pandigital number: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:33, 11 February 2009 edit84.196.254.9 (talk) Added comment about 1234567890, digits are not in order← Previous edit Revision as of 20:57, 12 August 2023 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,060 editsm Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}}

== Too complicated == == Too complicated ==



Revision as of 20:57, 12 August 2023

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Too complicated

This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! Numerao 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

This is honestly retarded. This is like saying a straight in poker is mathamatically important. AtrusRand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.251.198 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321


The number 1234567890 does NOT have all digits in order (unless you mean modulo 10). 84.196.254.9 (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Category: