Revision as of 16:38, 22 March 2007 editPiperdown (talk | contribs)1,821 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 22 March 2007 edit undoSamiharris (talk | contribs)1,443 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Sam, I'm being civil, your "praise" was sarcastic in tone, patronizing, and out of line.] 16:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | Sam, I'm being civil, your "praise" was sarcastic in tone, patronizing, and out of line.] 16:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I do not understand how you could possibly read "sacrcasm" into remarks intended to be conciliatory. You appear to be trying to gain an advantage by putting other editors on the defensive. Please assume faith in other users as required by WP:AGF.--] 17:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:16, 22 March 2007
Welcome
Twiggy articleHi piperdown, I'm actually not sure what happened with the Twiggy article. I was actually just trying to change the categories to clean up the categorizations for the America's next top model category. Maybe I accidentally edited an older version and it reverted to that? Sorry for the problem, it won't happen again. Calliopejen 17:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Your comments in "Talk:naked short selling"Concerning your comments in naked short-selling: I was trying to be courteous and polite, and offered praise sincerely for what I considered to be an editing job well done. There was no intent to be "patronizing" and I must ask you to tone down the heat level and avoid making comments attacking other editors. Please keep in mind the requirements of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Thank you.--Samiharris 21:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|