Talk:Park Tower and Mall: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:47, 16 August 2023 editPascal666 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users17,486 edits →Recent revert: ReplyTag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:57, 16 August 2023 edit undoPascal666 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users17,486 edits →Recent revert: qNext edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Do you work for this building? You appear to keep removing anything that could be considered critical of it.		:Do you work for this building? You appear to keep removing anything that could be considered critical of it.
	:Misplaced Pages attempts to maintain a ]. The management company and unit owners trying to sell are happy to just list amenities unqualified. Misplaced Pages should also note which amenities are not free and when there are additional (potentially hidden/undisclosed) charges.		:Misplaced Pages attempts to maintain a ]. The management company and unit owners trying to sell are happy to just list amenities unqualified. Misplaced Pages should also note which amenities are not free and when there are additional (potentially hidden/undisclosed) charges.
	:] says nothing about buildings. If someone tried to list in this article the ownership percentage of each unit in the building, then ] would apply. A list of amenities noting potential downsides? Not even close.		:] says nothing about buildings. What specifically do you think applies here? If someone tried to list in this article the ownership percentage of each unit in the building, then ] would apply. A list of amenities noting potential downsides? Not even close.
	:Your comment "This is way too much specific detail for an encyclopedia article about a building" is laughable. Have you seen any other Misplaced Pages articles about buildings? ], for example, has entire sections labeled "Restaurants" and "Spa". Including this information as part of a longer sentence in this article is certainly not too much detail. Please apply your pruning to all of the articles linked to from ] before you remove any more information from this one.		:Your comment "This is way too much specific detail for an encyclopedia article about a building" is laughable. Have you seen any other Misplaced Pages articles about buildings? ], for example, has entire sections labeled "Restaurants" and "Spa". Including this information as part of a longer sentence in this article is certainly not too much detail. Please apply your pruning to all of the articles linked to from ] before you remove any more information from this one.
	:Thank you. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)		:Thank you. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:57, 16 August 2023

Chicago Stub‑class

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool based on the length of the article. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Is there a citation or reference to the original plan to include three towers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.44.153 (talk) 22:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Recent revert

I performed this revert as Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and not a collection of every single detail that currently applies to residents of a building. --ZimZalaBim 22:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

"Most" is a Weasel word. Why do you insist on including it? I'm trying to add facts as documented in the listed source(s).

Do you work for this building? You appear to keep removing anything that could be considered critical of it.

Misplaced Pages attempts to maintain a NPOV. The management company and unit owners trying to sell are happy to just list amenities unqualified. Misplaced Pages should also note which amenities are not free and when there are additional (potentially hidden/undisclosed) charges.

WP:NOT says nothing about buildings. What specifically do you think applies here? If someone tried to list in this article the ownership percentage of each unit in the building, then WP:NOT would apply. A list of amenities noting potential downsides? Not even close.

Your comment "This is way too much specific detail for an encyclopedia article about a building" is laughable. Have you seen any other Misplaced Pages articles about buildings? Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago), for example, has entire sections labeled "Restaurants" and "Spa". Including this information as part of a longer sentence in this article is certainly not too much detail. Please apply your pruning to all of the articles linked to from List of tallest buildings in Chicago before you remove any more information from this one.

Thank you. Pascal 23:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Categories: