| Revision as of 12:34, 16 August 2023 editNemov (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,181 edits removing disruptive IP editor nonsense.Tags: Manual revert 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:24, 20 August 2023 edit undoFormalDude (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,511 edits →Contentious topic alert: new sectionTags: Reverted contentious topics alert New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :@] Thanks for the help, but most of my edits there are just routine. Thanks again! ] (]) 23:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC) | :@] Thanks for the help, but most of my edits there are just routine. Thanks again! ] (]) 23:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == Contentious topic alert == | |||
| ] You have recently made edits related to articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see ]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> ––] ] 22:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:24, 20 August 2023
August 2023
Your recent editing history at Juan Branco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 23:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bbb23 Thanks for the help, but most of my edits there are just routine. Thanks again! Nemov (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Contentious topic alert
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics. ––FormalDude (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC)