Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:33, 21 August 2023

• Aszx5000 (talk · contribs · logs · block log · page moves · count · edit summaries · non-automated edits · articles created · BLP edits · AfD votes · XfD votes · admin score (beta) · CSD log · no prior RfA)
  

Welcome!

Hi Aszx5000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Graham87 01:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

AFDs

Hello, Aszx5000,

I've noticed that you have been closing AFD discussions days early. There are a limited circumstances where an AFD discussion can be closed early (read Misplaced Pages:Speedy keep) but you can't close a discussion after three or four days just because there is general agreement among participants on a certain outcome. You say you don't want to "prolong" the discussion but there is a reason why AFDs last for four days and as a NAC closer you have no power to just close a discussion halfway through because you believe the discussion has ended. Please also review Misplaced Pages:Non-admin closure so you can better understand the limited instances where an NAC closure is appropriate. I'm posting this notice now because if this continues and someone takes issue with your closures, you could be prevented from acting on AFD discussions. I've seen it happen before with other editors. Better to be corrected now than to be topic banned in the future. I'd hate to see this happen because, in general, I find your efforts very helpful. Just realize that as a NAC closer, there are limits to what you should do. Thanks for all of your contributions. Liz 08:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Oh, sorry about that. Am hugely appreciative of the efforts of admins to clear the queues out so wanted to do my bit, but understand the points you are making and will amend my efforts accordingly. Thanks again. Aszx5000 (talk) 08:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Sod off

I am sorry Mr. Ivandjiiski, despite your desire for anonymity, you are a textbook case of Misplaced Pages notability (link)

Whatever your temper or disposition, you can keep these idiotic remarks to yourself, if only because our policies require you to. DFlhb (talk) 21:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Aszx5000, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Misplaced Pages's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Administrator noteI'm going alittle out-of-process here as we won't normally consider anyone with less than 20 articles created, but I feel the quality of the few you have created is enough for me to bend the rules a bit. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Wow, thank you for that Beeblebrox! Aszx5000 (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Stop your edit-warring

You seem to be too close to the subject. Don't worry, it is not like anyone is going to take away her world record. 2001:2020:329:A113:202B:CD52:5E28:C7F3 (talk) 14:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

When an editor engage in an edit-war, one can get blocked. Around two more instances of removing the same information, will quite likely get you blocked. 2001:2020:329:A113:202B:CD52:5E28:C7F3 (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

There seems a lot of sockpuppeting at the Kristin Harila blp to turn it into an attack page. Aszx5000 (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Kristin Harila

Hello! Please delete the Controversy section from the Kristin Harila page. Regards Szelma W (talk) 12:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I see that now and have reverted them per the Talk Page discussion. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 12:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

––FormalDude (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)