Revision as of 07:36, 30 August 2023 editFaraz Sualeh (talk | contribs)337 edits →Explain the Revert!: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:39, 30 August 2023 edit undoThebiguglyalien (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers19,557 edits →CTOP notice: new sectionTags: Reverted contentious topics alert New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 367: | Line 367: | ||
:{{ping|Faraz Sualeh}} every deceased must have own Misplaced Pages article. ] does not have an article. ] (]) 06:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | :{{ping|Faraz Sualeh}} every deceased must have own Misplaced Pages article. ] does not have an article. ] (]) 06:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
::🤔 I saw several such names who don't have an article and 'Mohammad Al Adendani' is well known among Egyptians and Arabs... That's why I put his name! But anyways no problem ✌️ ] (]) 07:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | ::🤔 I saw several such names who don't have an article and 'Mohammad Al Adendani' is well known among Egyptians and Arabs... That's why I put his name! But anyways no problem ✌️ ] (]) 07:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
== CTOP notice == | |||
] You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see ]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> | |||
I was also going to leave you a notification regarding ], but it seems you received one recently. Conduct policies are more strictly enforced when discussing these topics. Comments like ] and ] are not constructive and should be avoided. ] <small>(])</small> 23:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:39, 30 August 2023
Archives |
Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12 |
My Awards
Extended content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI! THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK! JackGann (talk) 07:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Way to pounce! I went to do this exact edit a minute after you... stop reading my mind! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
My DYK
Extended content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On 14 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Schoharie limousine crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the stretch limousine involved in the recent crash near Schoharie, New York, killing 20, appeared at two vehicle inspections earlier this year with different license plates? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Schoharie limousine crash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. A beer for you!
Christchurch mosque shootingsThanks for keeping the international reactions under control. AIRcorn (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!For your work on Christchurch_mosque_shootings. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Fame at last...
How does Misplaced Pages deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. No mention of me though:). Nice diagrams, and a quick look at the page histories of shooting incidents will show a core of regular editors.--♦IanMacM♦ 17:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
HI WWGB, I'm a researcher at Sydney Uni and would like to contact you. I'm not sure how best to do this and hoping this message somehow reaches you....Doctor 17. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor 17 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- This initial contact led to this article. WWGB (talk) 02:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Were you aware?
I assume that you have been made aware of this. But, in the event that you were not, I wanted to point it out to you and bring this to your attention. Your name was mentioned in this article: How does Misplaced Pages deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
"Killing" of Nahel Merzouk
Are you aware that there has not been due process and no one has been sentenced in this particular case? I don't think Misplaced Pages should do original research and bypass the legal system in such cases.
I think it would be more objective to use more neutral language and instead present facts that can be cited in reputable sources. IndyCar1020 (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- @IndyCar1020: There is nothing accusatory about use of the term "killing", which is just another term for homicide. A killing (or homicide) may be legal or not, depending on the circumstances. A killing in self-defence, in war or by state-sanctioned execution is legal. It is beyond doubt that Merzouk is dead, and that he died at the hands of police. It remains to be seen whether that killing was justified. If appropriate, the title will be changed to "Murder of Nahel Merzouk" if that is the judicial finding. For now, "killing" is the most correct term to describe the circumstances of Merzouk's death. WWGB (talk) 05:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Could you please explain the revert?
You reverted my edit of "an unanimous" to "a unanimous". Why? I'm not a native speaker so I would be thankful if you could explain. As far as I know "a" changes to "an" if a vowel comes next. Thank you. --JonValkenberg (talk) 12:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- @JonValkenberg: It's not that simple. It depends on the sound of the vowel. Unanimous sounds like "you-nanimous" so it is preceded by "a". Just like one might say "a one-dollar bill" and not "an one-dollar bill"; one sounds like "won" and it too is preceded by "a". For further information, see . WWGB (talk) 13:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! JonValkenberg (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
Explain the Revert!
hey, you recently reverted my edit in 'Deaths in May 2023' Can you explain why? Faraz Sualeh (talk) 06:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Faraz Sualeh: every deceased must have own Misplaced Pages article. Mohammad Al Adendani does not have an article. WWGB (talk) 06:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- 🤔 I saw several such names who don't have an article and 'Mohammad Al Adendani' is well known among Egyptians and Arabs... That's why I put his name! But anyways no problem ✌️ Faraz Sualeh (talk) 07:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
CTOP notice
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics.
I was also going to leave you a notification regarding gun control as a contentious topic, but it seems you received one recently. Conduct policies are more strictly enforced when discussing these topics. Comments like this and this are not constructive and should be avoided. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)