| Revision as of 18:32, 14 January 2007 editBondego (talk | contribs)860 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:09, 24 March 2007 edit undoDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| '''''Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society''''' is a book by ] published in ]. | '''''Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society''''' is a book by ] published in ]. | ||
| The book is about the ] debate, but does also discuss Indian politics and communalism. | The book is about the ] debate, but does also discuss Indian politics and ]. | ||
| Elst |
Elst opines that reaching national integration "requires dropping the anti-Hindu separatist doctrines that have largely been created for the purposes of several imperialisms, and are now being kept afloat with a lot of distortive intellectual and propagandistic effort." | ||
| In the eight chapter, Elst writes about some examples of history distortion and history rewriting by ] historians. He also writes about ] and ], and alleges "that a clear majority of the riots are started by Muslims". In another chapter, the author discusses the banning of books like ]'s ]. In the 14th chapter he discusses the concept of "Hindu Fascism". | In the eight chapter, Elst writes about some examples of history distortion and history rewriting by ] historians. He also writes about ] and ], and alleges "that a clear majority of the riots are started by Muslims". In another chapter, the author discusses the banning of books like ]'s ]. In the 14th chapter he discusses the concept of "Hindu Fascism". | ||
Revision as of 14:09, 24 March 2007
| File:Bookcover ayodhya.jpg | |
| Author | Koenraad Elst |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Publication date | 1991 |
| Publication place | India |
Template:AyodhyaDebate Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society is a book by Koenraad Elst published in 1991.
The book is about the Ayodhya debate, but does also discuss Indian politics and communalism. Elst opines that reaching national integration "requires dropping the anti-Hindu separatist doctrines that have largely been created for the purposes of several imperialisms, and are now being kept afloat with a lot of distortive intellectual and propagandistic effort."
In the eight chapter, Elst writes about some examples of history distortion and history rewriting by Marxist historians. He also writes about Indian Secularism and Communalism, and alleges "that a clear majority of the riots are started by Muslims". In another chapter, the author discusses the banning of books like Ram Swarup's Understanding Islam through Hadis. In the 14th chapter he discusses the concept of "Hindu Fascism".
The Ayodhya debate
Elst believes that "in keeping with the internationally accepted standards of methodology and inference in scientific history-writing, we may conclude ... that the Babri Masjid was built in replacement of a Hindu temple where Ram worship used to take place. In fact, this conclusion is merely a restatement of what was a matter of consensus until a few years ago. This time it is supported by a bundle of evidence, but it had been known all along. It is only recently that politically motivated academics have manufactured doubts concerning this coherent and well-attested tradition." He says that the anti-Temple side gave no evidence, and ignored the pro-Temple evidence and concludes that "the way the anti-Mandir falsehoods have been given wide currency in 1989-91 will make an interesting case study for future scholars. A classic in propaganda."
But Elst does not believe in a forcible take-over of ancient temples. According to him, the Hindus should ask for a gesture of good will:
- The Hindu leaders should say to the Muslim leaders : Look, we want these places back. For many centuries they have been our sacred places, and we have suffered the mosques built there only under duress. We do not believe in the forcible take-over of places of worship, we are not Babars and Aurangzebs. But we want from you a gesture of goodwill, a sign that you turn this infamous persecution page of history. We will not take any kind of revenge if you do not feel ready for this gesture, but we will expressly wait until you are ready.
In one chapter, the book describes the press reporting on the debate. Elst alleges that the media was controlled by the anti-Temple side, and that "the foreign press has not added any extra facts or perspective to the reporting on Ayodhya. It has mostly copied the bias of the Indian press."
Categories: