Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ropucha-class landing ship: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:42, 13 September 2023 edit109.37.147.78 (talk) →Minsk: wrong shipTag: Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 20:44, 13 September 2023 edit undo109.37.147.78 (talk) Undid revision 1175264446 by 109.37.147.78 (talk)Tag: UndoNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


I left the ship as active because the cite provided links to this tweet , which states that is "likely beyond economic repair" which is different than "is beyond economic repair". The first is supposition and not backed by proof. The second would be fact. Therefore the cite cannot be used to back up that statement. ] (]) 18:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC) I left the ship as active because the cite provided links to this tweet , which states that is "likely beyond economic repair" which is different than "is beyond economic repair". The first is supposition and not backed by proof. The second would be fact. Therefore the cite cannot be used to back up that statement. ] (]) 18:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

:{{reply|Llammakey}} the ship is confused with ], so the content should be moved to the other vessel. ] (]) 20:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:44, 13 September 2023

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
WikiProject iconShips Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShipsWikiProject icon
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Assessment

This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. Haus 22:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Ropucha II Sucessor

(I am argentinian, my english it s bad) The Ivan Green class Landing Ship Tank it's the sucessor of the alligator class lst, but what it's the sucessor of the ropucha II lst. My opinion.....the ropucha II not have a sucessor or the ivan green it's a sucessor of the alligator class and the ropucha II class. Please respond/answer.

Juakoblabla (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ropuchas from Berdiansk

Copied from Talk:Russian ship Caesar Kunikov

In the video the number on the ship in the front resembles "58", a "1" is not visible however (scraped off? or completely different ship?), so if the decision is between only the two ships mentioned here, I'd say the Novocherkassk is the one in the back with the quite intense fire on the foredeck. However, one can also see a bit of smoke from the ship in the front (though that might only be smoldering debris blown over from the Saratov at the dock).--OBrian (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

  • It is quite possible, that for current operation all Ropuchas had changed their numbers (at least the nearest ship is painted off its name near stern). Moreover there are sources that Ropuchas from other fleets had also entered in Black Sea for exercises in the beginning of 2022. So, it is possible, that they are not even CK and N. Alex Spade (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Minsk

I left the ship as active because the cite provided links to this tweet , which states that is "likely beyond economic repair" which is different than "is beyond economic repair". The first is supposition and not backed by proof. The second would be fact. Therefore the cite cannot be used to back up that statement. Llammakey (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Categories: