Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jeffpw: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:57, 24 March 2007 view sourceBobTheTomato (talk | contribs)2,842 edits Thanks for your note← Previous edit Revision as of 22:22, 24 March 2007 view source MiszaBot (talk | contribs)81,480 editsm Automated placement of archivisation template.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(2d)
|archive = User talk:Jeffpw/Archive %(counter)d
|maxarchivesize = 75K
|counter = 5
|maxage = 2d
}}
{|- align="center" {|- align="center"
| ] | ]

Revision as of 22:22, 24 March 2007

Archive

Archives


1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8

I can't keep secrets!

After looking at your User page, I have a gift coming your way, but I'm horrible at keeping these things in - never tell me anything you don't want others to know! Let's hope it happens...read below:

       from		"Cynspr@aol.com" <Cynspr@aol.com> 		 
       to		davidshankbone@gmail.com	  
       date		Mar 21, 2007 5:39 PM	 
       subject		Re: Daniel Rodriguez	 
       Misplaced Pages Shoot
       It would be New York/Staten Island -
       Daniel is performing at the Nicks Game March 28 and Rangers April 1
       I will ask  him to pick a date and a place to see if what works for you
       Cynthia

--David Shankbone 03:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh my, David! That would be so cool!!!!!!!!!! If it does happen, please tell him you know somebody who worked hard on his Misplaced Pages biography!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You get to meet the most fabulous people! Jeffpw 07:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

so...

I'd better put on my serious face then. — coelacan09:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you want to request the checkuser, or should I? — coelacan08:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I do so hate admin chores, Coelacan, and you're so much better at that sort of thing:-)....which reminds me: why haven't you made a grab for the mop and vaporizer yet? (and I miss the pretty líl kittycat on my page). Jeffpw 08:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Eh, mop, I will when I feel like I need it. I'll go do the checkuser request. It was the "I used to edit wikipedia articles, but left because of user abuse. I myself have been subjected to attack by the LGBT community because of differences of opinion on religious issues" that suggested it to you, yes?coelacan09:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Where the hell are all these cat pictures coming from?! And how cat expressions are there?! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Yup, that was it. Couldn't be more obvious to me. I suppose it might be rjb, but that would surprise me more. But it is an obvious sockpuppet in either case. I note he has put that offensive userpage back up. By the way, nice kitty. :-) Jeffpw 09:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Rbj is not banned or blocked and so would have no reason to sock. Those statements are really not Rbj's style either; he's not weird like that. Dev: I get them from Commons:Cats and its categories. =) — coelacan09:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For the back-up on the Tara Subkoff page. It's such a typically American fight. Clearly this person hasn't left the country and gone on a public beach, or he wouldn't find breasts so objectionable. Out of 500 photographs I've put on here, four have exposed boobs. But it's a nice little fantasy I have that my $160.00 6 megapixel could actually get me started in a photography career when I "fail out of law school" - LOL! He articulated my deepest, darkest desires and fears so, so well. haha. It's interesting how often people ascribe motivations to other people to justify their own behavior/response. --David Shankbone 13:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Apologies

I'm sorry that my deletion of a vote seems to have created an issue on the Buchanan article. I've asked to be left well enough out of it on that article. Hope all is well with you. NickBurns 18:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your note

I appreciate your note on my talk page. What's past is past, and I'm certain that we can both improve the project moving forward. Ironically enough, I think you'll find that I'm closer politically to you than you might think, based on our disagreements in the past. I am very hopeful that we can move forward and work in harmony for the betterment of the project. Thanks again for the nice note.K. Scott Bailey 16:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)