| Revision as of 17:51, 22 September 2023 editVQuakr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers39,484 edits →About the temporary removal.: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:54, 22 September 2023 edit undoGhostOfDanGurney (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,820 edits →About the temporary removal.: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :::So how come mine gets redirected and yours gets on the main page???? Sorry, this is bullshit. ―<span style="background:#368ec9;border:solid 2px;border-radius:5px"> ''''']''''' </span> 17:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | :::So how come mine gets redirected and yours gets on the main page???? Sorry, this is bullshit. ―<span style="background:#368ec9;border:solid 2px;border-radius:5px"> ''''']''''' </span> 17:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :::{{re|Lukt64}} We can wait to redirect until this is no longer linked from the main page per the spirit of ] #6, but there is clear consensus that a separate article on the diplomatic row is not warranted at this time. {{re|GhostOfDanGurney}} neither article is "yours" per the terms of use and who created what ''does not matter''. Quit whinging. ] (]) 17:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | :::{{re|Lukt64}} We can wait to redirect until this is no longer linked from the main page per the spirit of ] #6, but there is clear consensus that a separate article on the diplomatic row is not warranted at this time. {{re|GhostOfDanGurney}} neither article is "yours" per the terms of use and who created what ''does not matter''. Quit whinging. ] (]) 17:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Quit following me. ―<span style="background:#368ec9;border:solid 2px;border-radius:5px"> ''''']''''' </span> 17:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:54, 22 September 2023
Creation of the page
I made the page due to the fact that it states that it is a diplomatic crisis in the Main Page. Lukt64 (talk) 23:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Page title: not a crisis
Its misleading to call this a diplomatic crisis when most of the news outlets are classifying to this as a diplomatic 'row". It has not evolved to a full-fledge crisis yet.
Initially, I wasn't even sure if we needed the page given WP:BREAKING, and because the page on Hardeep Singh Nijjar seems to adequately cover the Canadian allegations and immediate fall out. But given the subsequent events this week, I can get on board with a dedicated page.
Any concerns before I move this page to 2023 Canada-India Diplomatic Row? Schwinnspeed (talk) 12:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
About the temporary removal.
Hardeep Singh Nijjar was not the crisis. A "See Also : Hardeep Singh Nijjar would be better. Lukt64 (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Lukt64: I previously attempted to create this article at Death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar. I was told no via consensus on the talk page at Talk:Hardeep Singh Nijjar. There is consensus against this article at this time. Please don't restore the redirect again. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- A link on the Main Page Shouldn't be a redirect in my opinion. Lukt64 (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- So how come mine gets redirected and yours gets on the main page???? Sorry, this is bullshit. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 17:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Lukt64: We can wait to redirect until this is no longer linked from the main page per the spirit of WP:CSK #6, but there is clear consensus that a separate article on the diplomatic row is not warranted at this time. @GhostOfDanGurney: neither article is "yours" per the terms of use and who created what does not matter. Quit whinging. VQuakr (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Quit following me. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- A link on the Main Page Shouldn't be a redirect in my opinion. Lukt64 (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2023 (UTC)